Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (UNINAMIONGOD1770273279)
The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.
Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis
Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis
- Timeline of IONOS Group's Cyber Attack and lateral movement inside company's environment.
- Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
- How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
- How this cyber incident impacts IONOS Group Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
- Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.
Full Incident Analysis Transcript
In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the IONOS Group breach identified under incident ID UNINAMIONGOD1770273279.
The analysis begins with a detailed overview of IONOS Group's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/ionos-group, the number of followers: 3287, the industry type: IT Services and IT Consulting and the number of employees: 79 employees
After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 768 and after the incident was 753 with a difference of -15 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.
In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on IONOS Group and their customers.
Network Solutions recently reported "SystemBC Botnet Resurfaces with 10,000+ Infected IPs, Targeting Hosting Providers and Government Infrastructure", a noteworthy cybersecurity incident.
Researchers at Silent Push have uncovered a resurgent SystemBC botnet, now controlling over 10,340 unique infected IP addresses worldwide.
The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting 10,340+ unique infected IPs.
Formal response steps have not been shared publicly yet.
The case underscores how Ongoing.
Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.
The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.
MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis
Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate to high confidence (80%), with evidence including scanned WordPress sites for vulnerabilities, and wordPress vulnerabilities exploited and External Remote Services (T1133) with moderate to high confidence (70%), with evidence including compromised systems into SOCKS5 proxies, and hosting providers targeted. Under the Execution tactic, the analysis identified Command and Scripting Interpreter (T1059) with high confidence (90%), with evidence including perl-based Linux variant evaded detection, and droppers like SafeObject unpack 264 payloads and Exploitation for Client Execution (T1203) with moderate to high confidence (70%), with evidence including wordPress vulnerabilities exploited, and broader exploitation campaigns. Under the Persistence tactic, the analysis identified Account Manipulation (T1098) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating some systems remained compromised for over 100 days and Server Software Component: Web Shell (T1505.003) with moderate to high confidence (70%), with evidence including scanned WordPress sites for vulnerabilities, and backconnect setup. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Obfuscated Files or Information (T1027) with high confidence (90%), with evidence including rC4-encrypted custom protocols, and perl variant evaded all 62 VirusTotal scanners, Hide Artifacts: Hidden Window (T1564.003) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating backconnect setup obscures malicious operations, and Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating hosting providers targeted for high-bandwidth access. Under the Command and Control tactic, the analysis identified Proxy (T1090) with high confidence (90%), with evidence including converts compromised systems into SOCKS5 proxies, and 10,340 unique infected IPs, Encrypted Channel (T1573) with moderate to high confidence (80%), with evidence including rC4-encrypted custom protocols, and backconnect setup, and Dynamic Resolution (T1568) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating bulletproof hosting providers like bthoster.com. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Network Denial of Service (T1498) with high confidence (90%), with evidence including dDoS attacks launched via botnet, and 10,340+ infected IPs for high-bandwidth access and Data Encrypted for Impact (T1486) with moderate to high confidence (70%), with evidence including malware functions as ransomware loader, and rC4-encrypted custom protocols. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.
Sources & References
- IONOS Group Rankiteo Cyber Incident Details: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/ionos-group/incident/UNINAMIONGOD1770273279
- IONOS Group CyberSecurity Rating page: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/ionos-group
- IONOS Group Rankiteo Cyber Incident Blog Article: https://blog.rankiteo.com/uninamiongod1770273279-namecheap-unifiedlayer-ionos-godaddy-cyber-attack-july-2018/
- IONOS Group CyberSecurity Score History: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/ionos-group/history
- IONOS Group CyberSecurity Incident Source: https://cyberpress.org/systembc-botnet-hijacks-10000-devices/
- Rankiteo A.I CyberSecurity Rating methodology: https://www.rankiteo.com/Images/rankiteo_algo.pdf
- Rankiteo TPRM Scoring methodology: https://static.rankiteo.com/model/rankiteo_tprm_methodology.pdf