Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Intesa Sanpaolo » INT1774888625

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (INT1774888625)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-39
Company Score Before Incident828 / 1000
Company Score After Incident789 / 1000
INCIDENT NUMBERINT1774888625
Type of Cyber IncidentBreach
ATTACK VECTORInsider Threat
DATA EXPOSEDBanking information of 3,573 clients
INCIDENT DATE31/01/2022
STATUSCompleted

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Intesa Sanpaolo's Breach and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Intesa Sanpaolo Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Intesa Sanpaolo breach identified under incident ID INT1774888625.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Intesa Sanpaolo's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/intesa-sanpaolo, the number of followers: 608599, the industry type: Banking and the number of employees: 54522 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 828 and after the incident was 789 with a difference of -39 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Intesa Sanpaolo and their customers.

Intesa Sanpaolo recently reported "Intesa Sanpaolo Fined for Undetected Employee Data Breach Affecting 3,573 Customers", a noteworthy cybersecurity incident.

Italy’s data protection authority, the Garante, has imposed a fine on Intesa Sanpaolo after an internal investigation revealed a prolonged breach of customer data by one of its employees.

The disruption is felt across the environment, and exposing Banking information of 3,573 clients, with nearly 3,573 clients, 6,600 unauthorized consultations records at risk.

In response, and began remediation that includes Implemented corrective measures to bolster data security.

The case underscores how Completed, teams are taking away lessons such as Persistent vulnerabilities in financial institutions’ ability to prevent insider threats; need for stricter safeguards for high-profile individuals, and recommending next steps like Improve internal monitoring and access controls; enhance detection of unauthorized access.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating employee accessed the banking information of 3,573 clients. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Credentials from Password Stores (T1555) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating employee conducted over 6,600 unauthorized consultations. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating breach of customer data by one of its employees and Data from Information Repositories (T1213) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating accessed the banking information of 3,573 clients. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating prolonged breach of customer data by one of its employees. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Impair Defenses: Disable or Modify Tools (T1562.001) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating breach...without detection by the bank’s internal controls and Indicator Removal: Clear Windows Event Logs (T1070.001) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating inadequate internal monitoring and access controls. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Destruction (T1485) with lower confidence (30%), supported by evidence indicating critical flaws in monitoring systems and Data Manipulation: Stored Data Manipulation (T1565.001) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized consultations of banking information. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Valid Accounts (90%)
Credential Access
Credentials from Password Stores (70%)
Collection
Data from Local System (90%)
Data from Information Repositories (90%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (60%)
Defense Evasion
Impair Defenses: Disable or Modify Tools (50%)
Indicator Removal: Clear Windows Event Logs (40%)
Impact
Data Destruction (30%)
Data Manipulation: Stored Data Manipulation (40%)