Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » NPG Security Services » INT1772490694

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (INT1772490694)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-111
Company Score Before Incident761 / 1000
Company Score After Incident650 / 1000
INCIDENT NUMBERINT1772490694
Type of Cyber IncidentRansomware
ATTACK VECTORNA
DATA EXPOSED17 GB
INCIDENT DATE18/11/2025
STATUSpublished

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of NPG Security Services's Ransomware and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts NPG Security Services Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the NPG Security Services breach identified under incident ID INT1772490694.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of NPG Security Services's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/intertech-group-inc., the number of followers: 83, the industry type: Security and Investigations and the number of employees: 23 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 761 and after the incident was 650 with a difference of -111 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on NPG Security Services and their customers.

On 28 February 2026, InterTech Group, Inc. disclosed Ransomware issues under the banner "InterTech Group Hit by Akira Ransomware Attack".

The InterTech Group, Inc.

The disruption is felt across the environment, and exposing 17 GB.

In response, and stakeholders are being briefed through Notified impacted individuals, offered credit monitoring and identity protection services.

The case underscores how with advisories going out to stakeholders covering Advised affected parties to monitor credit reports and financial accounts for suspicious activity.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating suffered a data breach after the Akira ransomware group claimed responsibility and Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating akira ransomware group known for data exfiltration and ransom demands. Under the Execution tactic, the analysis identified User Execution: Malicious File (T1204.002) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating akira ransomware group claimed responsibility for the attack. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified OS Credential Dumping (T1003) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating social Security numbers, passports, driver’s licenses compromised and Unsecured Credentials: Credentials In Files (T1552.001) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating financial records, contracts, nondisclosure agreements exposed. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating 17 GB of data exfiltrated, including employee records and client data and Data from Information Repositories (T1213) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating confidential company documents, financial records exposed. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating akira ransomware group posted details on Tor network, 17 GB exfiltrated. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Encrypted for Impact (T1486) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating akira ransomware group known for ransom demands and Defacement: Internal Defacement (T1491.001) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating attack threatening the organizations existence. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Obfuscated Files or Information (T1027) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating akira ransomware group known for data exfiltration and ransom demands and Hide Artifacts: Hidden Files and Directories (T1564.001) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating no details on malware’s origin or extent of breach. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Exploit Public-Facing Application (50%)
Valid Accounts (60%)
Execution
User Execution: Malicious File (70%)
Credential Access
OS Credential Dumping (70%)
Unsecured Credentials: Credentials In Files (60%)
Collection
Data from Local System (80%)
Data from Information Repositories (70%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (90%)
Impact
Data Encrypted for Impact (50%)
Defacement: Internal Defacement (40%)
Defense Evasion
Obfuscated Files or Information (60%)
Hide Artifacts: Hidden Files and Directories (50%)

Sources & References