Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (INT1785975818)
The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.
Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis
Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis
- Timeline of Inter-Con Security's Breach and lateral movement inside company's environment.
- Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
- How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
- How this cyber incident impacts Inter-Con Security Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
- Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.
Full Incident Analysis Transcript
In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Inter-Con Security breach identified under incident ID INT1785975818.
The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Inter-Con Security's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/interconsecurity, the number of followers: 45034, the industry type: Security and Investigations and the number of employees: 5150 employees
After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 771 and after the incident was 688 with a difference of -83 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.
In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Inter-Con Security and their customers.
Inter-Con Security recently reported "Inter-Con Security Hit by ShinyHunters Extortion Attack", a noteworthy cybersecurity incident.
In June, cybercriminal group ShinyHunters targeted Inter-Con Security in a 'pay or leak' extortion campaign, resulting in the exposure of 276,000 unique email addresses alongside names, physical addresses, and other sensitive data.
The disruption is felt across the environment, and exposing 276,000 unique email addresses, names, physical addresses, and other sensitive data, with nearly 276,000 records at risk.
Formal response steps have not been shared publicly yet.
The case underscores how teams are taking away lessons such as Highlights the growing threat of double-extortion tactics and vulnerabilities in third-party security practices.
Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.
The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.
MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis
Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating vulnerabilities in third-party security practices and Trusted Relationship (T1199) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating highlights vulnerabilities in third-party security practices. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Unsecured Credentials (T1552) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating vulnerabilities in third-party security practices. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating 276,000 unique email addresses, names, physical addresses compromised. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating data exfiltration such as Yes (published publicly) and Exfiltration Over Web Service (T1567) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating leaked information was subsequently published. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Encrypted for Impact (Extortion) (T1471) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating double-extortion tactics, pay or leak extortion campaign and Data Encrypted for Impact (T1486) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating threaten to release data publicly unless ransom is paid. Under the Reconnaissance tactic, the analysis identified Phishing for Information (T1598) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating 44% of affected emails linked to LinkedIn profiles. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.
Sources & References
- Inter-Con Security Rankiteo Cyber Incident Details: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/interconsecurity/incident/INT1785975818
- Inter-Con Security CyberSecurity Rating page: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/interconsecurity
- Inter-Con Security Rankiteo Cyber Incident Blog Article: https://blog.rankiteo.com/int1785975818-inter-con-security-breach-june-2026/
- Inter-Con Security CyberSecurity Score History: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/interconsecurity/history
- Inter-Con Security CyberSecurity Incident Source: https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:7490916105138597888
- Rankiteo A.I CyberSecurity Rating methodology: https://www.rankiteo.com/Images/rankiteo_algo.pdf
- Rankiteo TPRM Scoring methodology: https://static.rankiteo.com/model/rankiteo_tprm_methodology.pdf