Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Inter-Con Security » INT1783988678

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (INT1783988678)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-84
Company Score Before Incident667 / 1000
Company Score After Incident583 / 1000
INCIDENT NUMBERINT1783988678
Type of Cyber IncidentBreach
ATTACK VECTORNA
DATA EXPOSED2.7 million records
INCIDENT DATE18/06/2026
STATUSUnder investigation

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Inter-Con Security's Breach and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Inter-Con Security Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Inter-Con Security breach identified under incident ID INT1783988678.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Inter-Con Security's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/interconsecurity, the number of followers: 45034, the industry type: Security and Investigations and the number of employees: 5150 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 667 and after the incident was 583 with a difference of -84 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Inter-Con Security and their customers.

On 19 June 2026, Inter-Con Security Systems, Inc. disclosed Data Breach issues under the banner "Inter-Con Security Systems Hit by Alleged Data Breach Affecting 2.7 Million Individuals".

On June 19, 2026, the cybercriminal group ShinyHunters claimed responsibility for a data breach targeting Inter-Con Security Systems, Inc., a Pasadena, California-based multinational security firm.

The disruption is felt across the environment, and exposing 2.7 million records, with nearly 2.7 million records at risk.

Formal response steps have not been shared publicly yet.

The case underscores how Under investigation.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating data breach targeting Inter-Con Security Systems, Inc. and Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating sensitive information tied to current and former employees. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Unsecured Credentials (T1552) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating personally Identifiable Information (PII) compromised and OS Credential Dumping (T1003) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating 2.7 million records potentially exposing sensitive information. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating 2.7 million records...exposing sensitive information and Data from Information Repositories (T1213) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating internal corporate data compromised. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating alleged theft of approximately 2.7 million records by ShinyHunters and Exfiltration Over Web Service (T1567) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating cybercriminal group ShinyHunters claimed responsibility. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Destruction (T1485) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating potential violation of federal or state data breach notification laws and Data Manipulation: Stored Data Manipulation (T1565.001) with lower confidence (30%), supported by evidence indicating heightened risks of identity theft and privacy violations. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Exploit Public-Facing Application (50%)
Valid Accounts (60%)
Credential Access
Unsecured Credentials (70%)
OS Credential Dumping (50%)
Collection
Data from Local System (80%)
Data from Information Repositories (70%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (90%)
Exfiltration Over Web Service (60%)
Impact
Data Destruction (40%)
Data Manipulation: Stored Data Manipulation (30%)

Sources & References