Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Intercommunity Action » INT0833408112425

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (INT0833408112425)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-75
Company Score Before Incident758 / 1000
Company Score After Incident683 / 1000
Company LinkView Intercommunity Action Profile
INCIDENT NUMBERINT0833408112425
Type of Cyber IncidentBreach
ATTACK VECTORNA
DATA EXPOSEDPersonal Information
INCIDENT DATE28/05/2025
STATUSOngoing (as of disclosure)

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Intercommunity Action's Breach and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Intercommunity Action Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Intercommunity Action breach identified under incident ID INT0833408112425.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Intercommunity Action's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/intercommunity-action-inc, the number of followers: 1477, the industry type: Individual and Family Services and the number of employees: 108 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 758 and after the incident was 683 with a difference of -75 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Intercommunity Action and their customers.

On 29 May 2025, Intercommunity Action disclosed Data Breach / Unauthorized Access issues under the banner "Intercommunity Action Data Breach Exposes Sensitive Personal Information".

Intercommunity Action, a Philadelphia-based provider of aging services, behavioral health support, and programs for individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities, experienced unauthorized access to its computer network.

The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting Computer Network, and exposing Personal Information, with nearly 2,680 records at risk.

In response, and stakeholders are being briefed through Notification sent to affected individuals (2,680 people).

The case underscores how Ongoing (as of disclosure), with advisories going out to stakeholders covering Notification letters sent to 2,680 affected individuals.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized actors gained access to the organization’s computer network and External Remote Services (T1133) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized access to its computer network (method unspecified, remote access implied). Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate to high confidence (85%), supported by evidence indicating exposure of personal information (names, contact info, medical records). Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over Alternative Protocol (T1048) with moderate to high confidence (75%), supported by evidence indicating compromised data likely included sensitive PII (exfiltration implied by exposure). Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data from Cloud Storage (T1598) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating computer network access (potential cloud/on-prem overlap in healthcare orgs) and Data Destruction (T1485) with lower confidence (10%), supported by evidence indicating no explicit destruction mentioned, but exposure suggests unauthorized data access. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Sources & References