Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Integrative Emergency Services » INT1787603103

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (INT1787603103)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-64
Company Score Before Incident763 / 1000
Company Score After Incident699 / 1000
INCIDENT NUMBERINT1787603103
Type of Cyber IncidentBreach
ATTACK VECTOREmail Compromise
DATA EXPOSEDProtected health information, including names,...
INCIDENT DATE15/06/2026
STATUSUnder Investigation

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Integrative Emergency Services's Breach and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Integrative Emergency Services Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Integrative Emergency Services breach identified under incident ID INT1787603103.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Integrative Emergency Services's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/integrative-emergency-services, the number of followers: 6507, the industry type: Hospitals and Health Care and the number of employees: 374 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 763 and after the incident was 699 with a difference of -64 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Integrative Emergency Services and their customers.

On 09 July 2026, Integrative Emergency Services (IES) disclosed Data Breach issues under the banner "Integrative Emergency Services Data Breach Under Investigation After Email Compromise".

Integrative Emergency Services (IES), a Dallas-based healthcare services provider, is under investigation following a data breach that exposed sensitive patient information.

The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting Employee email account, and exposing Protected health information, including names, health information, and medical record identifiers.

In response, teams activated the incident response plan, moved swiftly to contain the threat with measures like Secured the compromised email account within 24 hours.

The case underscores how Under Investigation.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Phishing: Spearphishing Link (T1566.002) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized access to an employee’s email account for just over four hours and Valid Accounts: Cloud Accounts (T1078.004) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating employee’s email account...secured within 24 hours. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Brute Force: Password Guessing (T1110.001) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized access to an employee’s email account (implied) and Credentials from Password Stores (T1555) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating email compromise suggests possible credential theft. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Email Collection: Remote Email Collection (T1114.002) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating single email containing protected health information may have been viewed and Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating exposed data included names, health information, and medical record identifiers. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized access to email account with sensitive data and Exfiltration Over Alternative Protocol: Exfiltration Over Unencrypted/Obfuscated Non-C2 Protocol (T1048.003) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating email compromise suggests data exfiltration via email protocols. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Hide Artifacts: Email Hiding Rules (T1564.008) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized access to email account (possible hiding of activity). These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Phishing: Spearphishing Link (80%)
Valid Accounts: Cloud Accounts (70%)
Credential Access
Brute Force: Password Guessing (60%)
Credentials from Password Stores (50%)
Collection
Email Collection: Remote Email Collection (90%)
Data from Local System (70%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (70%)
Exfiltration Over Alternative Protocol: Exfiltration Over Unencrypted/Obfuscated Non-C2 Protocol (60%)
Defense Evasion
Hide Artifacts: Email Hiding Rules (50%)

Sources & References