Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Integrated Pain Associates » INT1777760724

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (INT1777760724)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-68
Company Score Before Incident755 / 1000
Company Score After Incident687 / 1000
Company LinkView Integrated Pain Associates Profile
INCIDENT NUMBERINT1777760724
Type of Cyber IncidentBreach
ATTACK VECTORNA
DATA EXPOSEDPersonal and medical data
INCIDENT DATE23/02/2026
STATUSOngoing

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Integrated Pain Associates's Breach and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Integrated Pain Associates Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Integrated Pain Associates breach identified under incident ID INT1777760724.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Integrated Pain Associates's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/integrated-pain-associates, the number of followers: 559, the industry type: Medical Practices and the number of employees: 66 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 755 and after the incident was 687 with a difference of -68 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Integrated Pain Associates and their customers.

On 24 February 2026, Integrated Pain Associates (IPA) disclosed Data Breach issues under the banner "Integrated Pain Associates Data Breach Exposes Sensitive Patient Information".

A cybersecurity incident involving Integrated Pain Associates (IPA), a Central and West Texas-based medical practice, may have compromised the personal and medical data of affected individuals.

The disruption is felt across the environment, and exposing Personal and medical data.

In response, teams activated the incident response plan, moved swiftly to contain the threat with measures like Network secured.

The case underscores how Ongoing.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate to high confidence (70%), with evidence including unauthorized access may have occurred, and detected suspicious activity within its systems and Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating cybersecurity incident involving Integrated Pain Associates. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Unsecured Credentials (T1552) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating potentially exposing sensitive patient information including SSNs and drivers licenses and OS Credential Dumping (T1003) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized access may have occurred. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating compromised data includes full names, addresses, medical details, and financial account details and Data from Information Repositories (T1213) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating medical practice focused on pain management and minimally invasive spine surgery. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating potentially exposing sensitive patient information and Transfer Data to Cloud Account (T1537) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating third-party investigation revealed unauthorized access. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Destruction (T1485) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating no further public details on the scope of the breach and Data Manipulation: Transmitted Data Manipulation (T1565.002) with lower confidence (30%), supported by evidence indicating sensitive patient information may have been compromised. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Valid Accounts (70%)
Exploit Public-Facing Application (50%)
Credential Access
Unsecured Credentials (60%)
OS Credential Dumping (50%)
Collection
Data from Local System (80%)
Data from Information Repositories (70%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (70%)
Transfer Data to Cloud Account (50%)
Impact
Data Destruction (40%)
Data Manipulation: Transmitted Data Manipulation (30%)

Sources & References