What is the official website of Instructional Staffing ?

The official website of Instructional Staffing is https://http://www.browardschools.com/teacher.

What is Instructional Staffing's cybersecurity risk score?

Instructional Staffing has an AI-generated cybersecurity risk score of 772 out of 1000, indicating a Fair security posture according to Rankiteo's assessment.

How many security incidents has Instructional Staffing experienced?

According to Rankiteo, Instructional Staffing currently holds 0 security badges, indicating that no recognized compliance certifications are currently verified for the organization.

Has Instructional Staffing been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents ?

According to Rankiteo, Instructional Staffing has not been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents, and no incident IDs are currently listed for the organization.

Does Instructional Staffing have SOC 2 Type 1 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, Instructional Staffing is not certified under SOC 2 Type 1.

Does Instructional Staffing have SOC 2 Type 2 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, Instructional Staffing does not hold a SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Does Instructional Staffing comply with GDPR ?

According to Rankiteo, Instructional Staffing is not listed as GDPR compliant.

Does Instructional Staffing have PCI DSS certification ?

According to Rankiteo, Instructional Staffing does not currently maintain PCI DSS compliance.

Does Instructional Staffing comply with HIPAA ?

According to Rankiteo, Instructional Staffing is not compliant with HIPAA regulations.

Does Instructional Staffing have ISO 27001 certification ?

According to Rankiteo,Instructional Staffing is not certified under ISO 27001, indicating the absence of a formally recognized information security management framework.

Which industry does Instructional Staffing operate in ?

Instructional Staffing operates primarily in the Human Resources industry.

How many employees does Instructional Staffing have ?

Instructional Staffing employs approximately None employees people worldwide.

Does Instructional Staffing own any subsidiaries ?

Instructional Staffing presently has no subsidiaries across any sectors.

How many LinkedIn followers does Instructional Staffing have ?

Instructional Staffing's official LinkedIn profile has approximately followers.

Does Instructional Staffing have a Crunchbase profile ?

No, Instructional Staffing does not have a profile on Crunchbase.

Does Instructional Staffing have a LinkedIn profile ?

Yes, Instructional Staffing maintains an official LinkedIn profile, which is actively utilized for branding and talent engagement, which can be accessed here: https://www.linkedin.com/company/instructional-staffing.

How many cybersecurity incidents has Instructional Staffing experienced ?

As of June 16, 2026, Rankiteo reports that Instructional Staffing has experienced 2 cybersecurity incidents.

How many peer or competitor companies does Instructional Staffing have ?

Instructional Staffing has an estimated 1,202 peer or competitor companies worldwide.

What types of cybersecurity incidents has Instructional Staffing faced ?

Incident Types: The types of cybersecurity incidents that have occurred include Ransomware and Breach.

NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop

WindowsmacOSLinux

Download

Badge your company to reduce your risk score and your cyber insurance costs!

Link verified badges to your company page to build trust with insurers and customers.

Apply now and get your badge!

Internal validation & live display

Insurers and partners see a safer profile

Faster underwriting decisions

Trusted by insurers. Chosen by leaders.

Proud contributor to the Society of Actuaries.

Instructional Staffing

Boost Score +25 with badge (5 left)

772

/1000

Fair

797

/1000

Fair

Instructional Staffing Vendor Cyber Rating & Cyber Score

browardschools.com

Add Your Compliance Badge

We may be coming to a city near you. Review the 2014 Recruitment Calendar for More Information. http://www.browardschools.com/teacher

Instructional Staffing A.I CyberSecurity Scoring

Scoring History

Instructional Staffing

Instructional Staffing CyberSecurity News & History

Past Incidents

Attack Types

Entity

Type

Severity

Impact

Seen

Blog Details

Supply Chain Source

Incident Details

View

Broward County Publ...

Breach

10/2024

TOWTUCGREBRO177...

Instructional Staff...

Ransomware

100

03/2021

BRO22376322

Loading…

A.I.

Instructional Staffing Company Scoring based on AI Models

Cyber Incidents Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

Actual

Prediction

Incident Predictions locked

Access Monitoring Plan

A.I Risk Score Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

Actual

Prediction A

Prediction B

Prediction C

Prediction D

A.I. Risk Score Predictions locked

Access Monitoring Plan

Loading…

Underwriter Stats for Instructional Staffing

Incidents vs Human Resources Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Instructional Staffing in 2026.

Incidents vs All-Companies Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Instructional Staffing in 2026.

Incident Types Instructional Staffing vs Human Resources Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Instructional Staffing in 2026.

Incident History - Instructional Staffing (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Loading…

SUBSIDIARY

Instructional Staffing Subsidiaries

Instructional Staffing

Human Resources

Website: https://http://www.browardschools.com/teacher

Company Size: None employees

Broward County Public SchoolsEducation Administration Programs

Loading…

Instructional Staffing Similar Companies

Loading…

NEWS

Instructional Staffing CyberSecurity News

Latest updates, reports, and threat intel affecting the global network.

January 16, 2026 07:37 PM

Senate committee moves Hawley rural hospital cybersecurity bill forward

Sen. Josh Hawley advances bill to boost cybersecurity staffing at rural hospitals, directing HHS to create workforce strategies and training...

Read Article

November 20, 2025 08:00 AM

HIPAA Training Requirements - Updated for 2026

The HIPAA training requirements are that “a covered entity must train all members of its workforce on policies and procedures […]

Read Article

April 09, 2025 07:00 AM

4 Things to Know About School Cybersecurity and Trump Funding Cuts

Staff reductions, funding cuts, and policy changes by the Trump administration will severely hamper information-sharing networks that schools rely on.

Read Article

March 20, 2025 07:00 AM

Substitute Teacher Service Sends Out Data Breach Letters Following Recent Cybersecurity Incident

On March 14, 2025, Substitute Teacher Service, Inc. (“STS”) filed a notice of data breach with the Attorney General of Massachusetts after...

Read Article

February 28, 2025 08:00 AM

Exclusive: Hegseth orders Cyber Command to stand down on Russia planning

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth last week ordered US Cyber Command to stand down from all planning against Russia, including offensive digital actions.

Read Article

September 16, 2024 07:00 AM

NIST SP 800-50r1 focuses on building federal cybersecurity and privacy learning programs

The U.S. Department of Commerce's National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) provides updated guidance to Special Publication...

Read Article

July 01, 2023 07:32 AM

Careers

The University of Texas at San Antonio is a nationally recognized, top-tier public research university that unites the power of higher education,...

Read Article

June 30, 2021 07:00 AM

Legislative Update: Training and Staff Development

Training and staff development requirements were impacted by bills passed in the 87th Regular Session of the Texas Legislature.

Read Article

Loading…

CVE

Latest

Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

CVE-2026-53430

SUMMARY

Improper Handling of Highly Compressed Data (Data Amplification) vulnerability in elixir-grpc grpc (GRPC.Compressor.Gzip, GRPC.Message modules) allows a denial of service via a gzip decompression bomb. This vulnerability is associated with program files lib/grpc/compressor/gzip.ex, lib/grpc/message.ex and program routines 'Elixir.GRPC.Compressor.Gzip':decompress/1, 'Elixir.GRPC.Message':from_data/2. 'Elixir.GRPC.Compressor.Gzip':decompress/1 calls :zlib.gunzip/1 directly on attacker-controlled bytes with no decompressed-size limit, ratio check, or incremental decoding. Because this module is the registered gzip GRPC.Compressor implementation, it is invoked automatically whenever an incoming gRPC frame carries the grpc-encoding: gzip header. :zlib.gunzip/1 allocates the entire decompressed result as a single binary, so a small highly compressible payload (for example a few kilobytes of zeros, which gzip compresses at roughly 1000:1) expands to multiple gigabytes inside a single call. The max_receive_message_length limit is enforced only against the already-decompressed message, so it provides no protection. An unauthenticated remote peer can send a single crafted frame to exhaust the BEAM node's heap and trigger an out-of-memory kill. This issue affects grpc: from 0.4.0 before 1.0.0.

Published

Date2026-06-15

Updated

Date2026-06-15

RISK INFORMATION (Score: )

cvss4

Base Score: 8.7

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Impact Score

Exploitability

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-48854

SUMMARY

Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling vulnerability in elixir-grpc grpc allows unauthenticated attackers to exhaust the BEAM's memory and crash the server by streaming a large or slow-trickle unary request body. 'Elixir.GRPC.Server.Adapters.Cowboy.Handler':read_full_body/3 (lib/grpc/server/adapters/cowboy/handler.ex) accumulates every received chunk into a single growing binary with no size cap. Additionally, when the client omits the grpc-timeout header, the per-chunk read timeout resolves to :infinity, allowing a slow-trickle client to keep the connection alive indefinitely while memory grows. A single connection is sufficient to exhaust server memory and crash the node. This issue affects grpc from 0.3.1 before 1.0.0.

Published

Date2026-06-15

Updated

Date2026-06-15

RISK INFORMATION (Score: )

cvss4

Base Score: 8.7

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Impact Score

Exploitability

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-48853

SUMMARY

Deserialization of Untrusted Data and Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling vulnerabilities in elixir-grpc grpc allow unauthenticated attackers to crash the BEAM node via atom table exhaustion and, when a decoded term flows into a call site that invokes it, achieve remote code execution on the server. 'Elixir.GRPC.Codec.Erlpack':decode/2 (lib/grpc/codec/erlpack.ex) calls :erlang.binary_to_term/1 on the raw gRPC message body without the :safe option, no size bound, and no type guard. Any unauthenticated peer that sends a request with Content-Type: application/grpc+erlpack can send a crafted payload that mints arbitrary new atoms (which are never garbage-collected, exhausting the bounded atom table and crashing the VM) or that encodes a fun term which, if applied anywhere downstream, executes attacker-controlled code inside the server process. This issue affects grpc from 0.4.0 before 1.0.0.

Published

Date2026-06-15

Updated

Date2026-06-15

RISK INFORMATION (Score: )

cvss4

Base Score: 9.2

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Impact Score

Exploitability

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-48723

SUMMARY

The browserstack-cypress-cli is BrowserStack's CLI which allows users to run Cypress tests on BrowserStack. Versions prior to 1.36.4 are vulnerable to OS command injection via the cypress_config_file configuration parameter. In readCypressConfigUtil.js, the loadJsFile() function constructs a shell command by interpolating the user-controlled cypress_config_filepath value into a template literal, then executes it via child_process.execSync(). Shell metacharacters in the config path (specifically " and ;) allow breaking out of the quoted argument and injecting arbitrary commands. This issue has been fixed in version 1.36.6.

Published

Date2026-06-15

Updated

Date2026-06-15

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.8)

cvss3

Base Score: 7.8

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Impact Score

5.9

Exploitability

1.8

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-48599

SUMMARY

Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key vulnerability in elixir-grpc grpc allows authenticated attackers to access or modify resources belonging to other users by smuggling a conflicting value for any path-bound field via the query string or request body. In 'Elixir.GRPC.Server.Transcode':map_request/5 (lib/grpc/server/transcode.ex), all three clauses use Map.merge/2 with path bindings as the first argument, giving them the lowest merge precedence. A request such as GET /users/me/profile?user_id=victim (or a POST with {"user_id": "victim"} when body: "*") yields a decoded protobuf struct where the path-bound field carries the attacker-supplied value rather than the router-extracted value. Any handler that uses the path-bound field for authorization, multi-tenancy scoping, or ownership checks is silently bypassed. This issue affects grpc from 0.8.0 before 1.0.0.

Published

Date2026-06-15

Updated

Date2026-06-15

RISK INFORMATION (Score: )

cvss4

Base Score: 7.6

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Impact Score

Exploitability

REFERENCES

Loading…

API

Access Data Using Our API

Get company history

curl -i -X GET 'https://api.rankiteo.com/underwriter-getcompany-history?
linkedin_id=axa' -H 'apikey: YOUR_API_KEY_HERE'

Try It API Documentation Rapid

MEASURE

What Do We Measure ?

Incident

Finding

Grade

Digital Assets

Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.

These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:

Network SecurityIdentify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.

SBOM (Software Bill of Materials)Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.

CMDB (Configuration Management Database)Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.

Threat IntelligenceLeverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.

Rankiteo

By Rankiteo

★ ★ ★ ★ ★

View on G2.com

Rankiteo is a unified scoring and risk platform that analyzes billions of signals weekly to help organizations gain faster, more actionable insights into emerging threats. Empowering teams to outpace adversaries and reduce exposure.

View latest plans →View all security reports →

MILESTONEG

Users
Love Us

Loading…