Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Instituto Acende Brasil » AKZINSHYDPOWWES1775047452

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (AKZINSHYDPOWWES1775047452)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-110
Company Score Before Incident742 / 1000
Company Score After Incident632 / 1000
INCIDENT NUMBERAKZINSHYDPOWWES1775047452
Type of Cyber IncidentRansomware
ATTACK VECTORNA
DATA EXPOSED242 TB
INCIDENT DATE28/02/2026
STATUSOngoing

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Instituto Acende Brasil's Ransomware and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Instituto Acende Brasil Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Instituto Acende Brasil breach identified under incident ID AKZINSHYDPOWWES1775047452.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Instituto Acende Brasil's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/instituto-acende-brasil, the number of followers: 5410, the industry type: Oil and Gas and the number of employees: 15 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 742 and after the incident was 632 with a difference of -110 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Instituto Acende Brasil and their customers.

On 31 March 2026, City of Minot (Water Treatment Plant) disclosed Ransomware issues under the banner "March 2026 Ransomware Surge: Critical Infrastructure Under Fire".

March 2026 marked a sharp escalation in ransomware activity, with 780 attacks recorded (a 13% increase from February) and the second-highest monthly total since February 2025.

The disruption is felt across the environment, and exposing 242 TB.

Formal response steps have not been shared publicly yet.

The case underscores how Ongoing.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating targeted campaigns against critical sectors, External Remote Services (T1133) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating utility sector saw a staggering 630% spike, and Valid Accounts: Cloud Accounts (T1078.004) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating state-sponsored and financially motivated threat actors. Under the Execution tactic, the analysis identified User Execution: Malicious File (T1204.002) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware activity...second-highest monthly total and Command and Scripting Interpreter: Windows Command Shell (T1059.003) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating operational halts (manufacturing). Under the Persistence tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating state-sponsored threat actors prioritizing high-impact disruptions and Create Account: Local Account (T1136.001) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating disruptions to accounting and communications. Under the Privilege Escalation tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating state-sponsored threat actors and Exploitation for Privilege Escalation (T1068) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating operational halts and shipping delays. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Obfuscated Files or Information (T1027) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware gangs leveraging data theft, operational disruption and Impair Defenses: Disable or Modify Tools (T1562.001) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating disruptions to accounting and communications. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified OS Credential Dumping (T1003) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating 242 TB of data was stolen and Brute Force: Password Spraying (T1110.003) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating utility sector saw a 630% spike. Under the Discovery tactic, the analysis identified File and Directory Discovery (T1083) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating 242 TB of data stolen, including 16 TB from Monmouth University and Network Service Discovery (T1046) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating critical infrastructure targeted (water treatment, utilities). Under the Lateral Movement tactic, the analysis identified Remote Services: SMB/Windows Admin Shares (T1021.002) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating operational halts and shipping delays in manufacturing and Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating state-sponsored threat actors. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating 242 TB of data was stolen, including 16 TB from Monmouth University and Automated Collection (T1119) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating pEAR’s attack on Monmouth University alone exposed 16 TB. Under the Command and Control tactic, the analysis identified Application Layer Protocol: Web Protocols (T1071.001) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware gangs leveraging data theft, operational disruption and Proxy: External Proxy (T1090.002) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating state-sponsored threat actors. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating 242 TB of data was stolen, including 43 TB by AiLock and Transfer Data to Cloud Account (T1537) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating data theft as primary tactic. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Encrypted for Impact (T1486) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware activity...780 attacks recorded, Inhibit System Recovery (T1490) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating operational halts and four-day shutdown (UK school), and Service Stop (T1489) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating disruptions to accounting and communications. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Exploit Public-Facing Application (40%)
External Remote Services (50%)
Valid Accounts: Cloud Accounts (60%)
Execution
User Execution: Malicious File (70%)
Command and Scripting Interpreter: Windows Command Shell (50%)
Persistence
Valid Accounts (70%)
Create Account: Local Account (50%)
Privilege Escalation
Valid Accounts (70%)
Exploitation for Privilege Escalation (50%)
Defense Evasion
Obfuscated Files or Information (80%)
Impair Defenses: Disable or Modify Tools (60%)
Credential Access
OS Credential Dumping (70%)
Brute Force: Password Spraying (50%)
Discovery
File and Directory Discovery (70%)
Network Service Discovery (60%)
Lateral Movement
Remote Services: SMB/Windows Admin Shares (70%)
Valid Accounts (60%)
Collection
Data from Local System (90%)
Automated Collection (70%)
Command and Control
Application Layer Protocol: Web Protocols (80%)
Proxy: External Proxy (60%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (90%)
Transfer Data to Cloud Account (60%)
Impact
Data Encrypted for Impact (90%)
Inhibit System Recovery (70%)
Service Stop (60%)

Sources & References