Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Insee » INS1787955989

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (INS1787955989)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-26
Company Score Before Incident772 / 1000
Company Score After Incident746 / 1000
Company LinkView Insee Profile
INCIDENT NUMBERINS1787955989
Type of Cyber IncidentCyber Attack
ATTACK VECTORNA
DATA EXPOSEDLes données d’un grand nombre...
INCIDENT DATE14/08/2026
STATUSEn cours

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Insee's Cyber Attack and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Insee Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Insee breach identified under incident ID INS1787955989.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Insee's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/insee, the number of followers: 84378, the industry type: Government Administration and the number of employees: 2925 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 772 and after the incident was 746 with a difference of -26 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Insee and their customers.

Académie de Toulouse recently reported "Cyberattaque contre l’Éducation nationale : deux académies toujours paralysées à la veille de la rentrée", a noteworthy cybersecurity incident.

Le ministère de l’Éducation nationale a confirmé une cyberattaque ayant perturbé plusieurs académies françaises, avec des répercussions majeures à quelques jours de la rentrée scolaire.

The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting messageries professionnelles, environnements numériques de travail (ENT) and applications métiers, and exposing Les données d’un grand nombre d’agents et d’élèves pourraient avoir été exposées.

In response, teams activated the incident response plan, moved swiftly to contain the threat with measures like Réinitialisation complète des identifiants et mots de passe, coupure des accès non autorisés, and began remediation that includes Opérations de sécurisation en cours.

The case underscores how En cours, teams are taking away lessons such as Lacunes structurelles en cybersécurité au sein des administrations, notamment liées à des systèmes obsolètes et à l’absence d’authentification multifactorielle, with advisories going out to stakeholders covering Familles et enseignants informés des perturbations et des mesures alternatives (distribution papier des emplois du temps).

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating systèmes obsolètes et absence d’authentification multifactorielle and Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating réinitialisation complète des identifiants et mots de passe. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Brute Force (T1110) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating absence d’authentification multifactorielle and Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating accès non autorisé coupé via réinitialisation des identifiants. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Service Stop (T1489) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating messageries professionnelles et ENT inaccessibles, paralysie partielle and Defacement (T1491) with lower confidence (30%), supported by evidence indicating retour aux méthodes traditionnelles (distribution papier). Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating données d’agents et d’élèves pourraient avoir été exposées. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Impair Defenses: Disable or Modify Tools (T1562.001) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating réinitialisation complète des identifiants pour couper accès non autorisé. Under the Lateral Movement tactic, the analysis identified Remote Services: Remote Desktop Protocol (T1021.001) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating systèmes obsolètes exploités, accès partiel dépendant des configurations. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Exploit Public-Facing Application (60%)
Valid Accounts (80%)
Credential Access
Brute Force (50%)
Valid Accounts (70%)
Impact
Service Stop (90%)
Defacement (30%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (70%)
Defense Evasion
Impair Defenses: Disable or Modify Tools (60%)
Lateral Movement
Remote Services: Remote Desktop Protocol (50%)