Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » City of Inman » INM1768123690

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (INM1768123690)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-22
Company Score Before Incident732 / 1000
Company Score After Incident710 / 1000
Company LinkView City of Inman Profile
INCIDENT NUMBERINM1768123690
Type of Cyber IncidentCyber Attack
ATTACK VECTORNA
DATA EXPOSEDNA
INCIDENT DATE05/01/2026
STATUSOngoing

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of City of Inman's Cyber Attack and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts City of Inman Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the City of Inman breach identified under incident ID INM1768123690.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of City of Inman's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/inman-city-of, the number of followers: 164, the industry type: Government Administration and the number of employees: 11 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 732 and after the incident was 710 with a difference of -22 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on City of Inman and their customers.

City of Inman recently reported "Cyber Attack on the City of Inman", a noteworthy cybersecurity incident.

The city of Inman confirmed it was the victim of a cyber attack.

Impact assessments are still underway, so the full scope is not yet clear.

Formal response steps have not been shared publicly yet.

The case underscores how Ongoing.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating cyberattack...though officials have declined to disclose...methods and External Remote Services (T1133) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating ongoing investigation by...FBI’s Cyber Crimes unit. Under the Execution tactic, the analysis identified User Execution: Malicious File (T1204.002) with lower confidence (30%), supported by evidence indicating no details on attack’s scope or methods. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating attack limited on finance or reputation (implied access). Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating ongoing investigation...FBI’s Cyber Crimes unit. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Destruction (T1485) with lower confidence (30%), supported by evidence indicating no details on...potential impact on city operations and Defacement: Internal Defacement (T1491.001) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating attack limited on...reputation. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Exploit Public-Facing Application (50%)
External Remote Services (40%)
Execution
User Execution: Malicious File (30%)
Credential Access
Valid Accounts (60%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (50%)
Impact
Data Destruction (30%)
Defacement: Internal Defacement (40%)

Sources & References