Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

ING PolandING Poland
VS
WestpacWestpac
ING Poland

ING Poland

Sokolska 34, Katowice, PL, 40-086

Last Update: 28/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.ing.pl
788/1000Fair

The website belongs to ING Bank Śląski S.A. with its registered office in Katowice, postal code: 40-086, at ul. Sokolska 34. Information clause (pdf): https://www.ing.pl/klauzula. ING Bank Slaski from ING Group is one of the biggest banks in Poland. We provide integrat...

NAICS:52211
NAICS Definition:Commercial Banking
Employees:3,817
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Westpac

Westpac

Head Office: 200 Barangaroo Avenue, Sydney, 2000, AU

Last Update: 29/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.westpac.com.au
769/1000Fair

To turn doing into done, it takes a little Westpac. From rescue helicopters and signing the Equator Principles, to paying super during parental leave and initiatives like Westpac SaferPay and SafeCall that help protect customers from scams... we have a proud history of...

NAICS:52211
NAICS Definition:Commercial Banking
Employees:15,882
Subsidiaries:15
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
ING Poland

ING Poland

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Westpac

Westpac

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Banking Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ING Poland in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Banking Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Westpac in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - ING Poland (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ING Poland cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Westpac (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Westpac cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
ING Poland

ING Poland

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Westpac

Westpac

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Data Leak
WES224026323

FAQ

Between ING Poland company and Westpac company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between ING Poland company and Westpac company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between ING Poland company and Westpac company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between ING Poland company and Westpac company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between ING Poland company and Westpac company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between ING Poland company and Westpac company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between ING Poland company and Westpac company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between ING Poland company and Westpac company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between ING Poland company and Westpac company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between ING Poland company and Westpac company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between ING Poland company and Westpac company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between ING Poland and Westpac, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between ING Poland and Westpac, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - ING Poland or Westpac ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - ING Poland or Westpac ?
Between ING Poland and Westpac, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between ING Poland and Westpac, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1