Comparison Overview
ING Poland

ING Poland
Sokolska 34, Katowice, PL, 40-086
Last Update: 28/03/2026
The website belongs to ING Bank Śląski S.A. with its registered office in Katowice, postal code: 40-086, at ul. Sokolska 34. Information clause (pdf): https://www.ing.pl/klauzula. ING Bank Slaski from ING Group is one of the biggest banks in Poland. We provide integrat...

PT Bank Mandiri (Persero) Tbk.
Jalan Jenderal Sudirman, Kav 54-55, Jakarta, Special capital Region of Jakarta, ID, 12190
Last Update: 21/09/2026
Bank Mandiri was established on 2 October 1998, as part of the bank restructuring program of the Government of Indonesia. In July 1999, four state-owned banks - Bank Bumi Daya, Bank Dagang Negara, Bank Exim and Bapindo - were amalgamated into Bank Mandiri. The history o...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

ING Poland







PT Bank Mandiri (Persero) Tbk.






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Banking Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for ING Poland in 2026.
Incidents vs Banking Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for PT Bank Mandiri (Persero) Tbk. in 2026.
Incident History - ING Poland (X = Date, Y = Severity)
ING Poland cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - PT Bank Mandiri (Persero) Tbk. (X = Date, Y = Severity)
PT Bank Mandiri (Persero) Tbk. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

ING Poland

PT Bank Mandiri (Persero) Tbk.
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
HTTP/2 servers could end up crashing due to inadvertently modifying its HPACK encoder concurrently. This happens because the server modifies the HPACK encoder from two goroutines without synchronization: one uses the encoder to encode a HEADERS frame as part of a response sent to a client and the other modifies the encoder's table size when handling a SETTINGS frame containing SETTINGS_HEADER_TABLE_SIZE that a client sends. A malicious client can repeatedly send a request while changing the header table size to crash the server.
Multiple ECH outer extension references are not permitted under RFC 9849; previously, a client could send a well-crafted packet that could trigger memory exhaustion in the server process by specifying multiple references. We now reject these as malformed and curb the memory amplification vector as a result.
A trusted template author may have previously written a valid template wherein the use of the 'yield' keyword would not be correctly escaped. We now ensure that valid keyword uses are escaped and non-keyword uses are not escaped.
Improper certificate validation in Microsoft Partner Center allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.
Authorization bypass through user-controlled key in Microsoft Bookings allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.