What is the official website of Ing. Michal Ondracek ?

The official website of Ing. Michal Ondracek is http://www.michalondracek.com.

What is Ing. Michal Ondracek's cybersecurity risk score?

Ing. Michal Ondracek has an AI-generated cybersecurity risk score of 776 out of 1000, indicating a Fair security posture according to Rankiteo's assessment.

How many security incidents has Ing. Michal Ondracek experienced?

According to Rankiteo, Ing. Michal Ondracek currently holds 0 security badges, indicating that no recognized compliance certifications are currently verified for the organization.

Has Ing. Michal Ondracek been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents ?

According to Rankiteo, Ing. Michal Ondracek has not been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents, and no incident IDs are currently listed for the organization.

Does Ing. Michal Ondracek have SOC 2 Type 1 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, Ing. Michal Ondracek is not certified under SOC 2 Type 1.

Does Ing. Michal Ondracek have SOC 2 Type 2 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, Ing. Michal Ondracek does not hold a SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Does Ing. Michal Ondracek comply with GDPR ?

According to Rankiteo, Ing. Michal Ondracek is not listed as GDPR compliant.

Does Ing. Michal Ondracek have PCI DSS certification ?

According to Rankiteo, Ing. Michal Ondracek does not currently maintain PCI DSS compliance.

Does Ing. Michal Ondracek comply with HIPAA ?

According to Rankiteo, Ing. Michal Ondracek is not compliant with HIPAA regulations.

Does Ing. Michal Ondracek have ISO 27001 certification ?

According to Rankiteo,Ing. Michal Ondracek is not certified under ISO 27001, indicating the absence of a formally recognized information security management framework.

Which industry does Ing. Michal Ondracek operate in ?

Ing. Michal Ondracek operates primarily in the Professional Training and Coaching industry.

How many employees does Ing. Michal Ondracek have ?

Ing. Michal Ondracek employs approximately 1 people worldwide.

Does Ing. Michal Ondracek own any subsidiaries ?

Ing. Michal Ondracek presently has no subsidiaries across any sectors.

How many LinkedIn followers does Ing. Michal Ondracek have ?

Ing. Michal Ondracek's official LinkedIn profile has approximately 3 followers.

What is the NAICS classification code for Ing. Michal Ondracek ?

Ing. Michal Ondracek is classified under the NAICS code 6114, which corresponds to Business Schools and Computer and Management Training.

Does Ing. Michal Ondracek have a Crunchbase profile ?

No, Ing. Michal Ondracek does not have a profile on Crunchbase.

Does Ing. Michal Ondracek have a LinkedIn profile ?

Yes, Ing. Michal Ondracek maintains an official LinkedIn profile, which is actively utilized for branding and talent engagement, which can be accessed here: https://www.linkedin.com/company/ing-michal-ondracek.

How many cybersecurity incidents has Ing. Michal Ondracek experienced ?

As of September 9, 2026, Rankiteo reports that Ing. Michal Ondracek has experienced 1 cybersecurity incidents.

How many peer or competitor companies does Ing. Michal Ondracek have ?

Ing. Michal Ondracek has an estimated 7,342 peer or competitor companies worldwide.

What types of cybersecurity incidents has Ing. Michal Ondracek faced ?

Incident Types: The types of cybersecurity incidents that have occurred include Breach.

Badge your company to reduce your risk score and your cyber insurance costs!

Link verified badges to your company page to build trust with insurers and customers.

Apply now and get your badge!

Internal validation & live display

Insurers and partners see a safer profile

Faster underwriting decisions

Trusted by insurers. Chosen by leaders.

Proud contributor to the Society of Actuaries.

IMO

Boost Score +25 with badge (5 left)

776

/1000

Fair

801

/1000

Good

Ing. Michal Ondracek Vendor Cyber Rating & Cyber Score

michalondracek.com

Add Your Compliance Badge

More then 20 years of individual and team coaching experience. The Inner Game Coach and Facilitator. High Performance Teams developer. CQ-Collaboration Quotient founder.

IMO

Ing. Michal Ondracek CyberSecurity News & History

Past Incidents

Attack Types

Entity

Type

Severity

Impact

Seen

Blog Details

Supply Chain Source

Incident Details

View

Ing. Michal Ondrace...

Breach

100

11/2016

ING759090625

Loading…

A.I.

IMO Company Scoring based on AI Models

Cyber Incidents Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

Actual

Prediction

Incident Predictions locked

Access Monitoring Plan

A.I Risk Score Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

Actual

Prediction A

Prediction B

Prediction C

Prediction D

A.I. Risk Score Predictions locked

Access Monitoring Plan

Loading…

Underwriter Stats for IMO

Incidents vs Professional Training and Coaching Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ing. Michal Ondracek in 2026.

Incidents vs All-Companies Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ing. Michal Ondracek in 2026.

Incident Types IMO vs Professional Training and Coaching Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ing. Michal Ondracek in 2026.

Incident History - IMO (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Loading…

SUBSIDIARY

Ing. Michal Ondracek Subsidiaries

Parent Company

IMO

Professional Training and Coaching

Website: http://www.michalondracek.com

Company Size: 1

No subsidiary data available for this company.

Loading…

Ing. Michal Ondracek Similar Companies

My own company (I am self-employed)

anglais-pratique.fr

I created "My own company" in order to be able to invoice my clients, but I am now fully retired. I spend a fair share of my leisure time enhancing my "hobby" website (https://anglais-pratique.fr/), which is primarily intended for French speakers who wish to improve their English. I want to leave this group ("My own company..."), but can't find how, probably because I created it!!! So let it be :-)

AFPA

afpa.fr

L'AFPA, PREMIER ORGANISME DE FORMATION PROFESSIONNELLE DES ADULTES Avec plus de 140 000 personnes formées chaque année dans plus de 200 implantations partout en France, l’Afpa, devenue Agence nationale pour la formation professionnelle des adultes en janvier 2017, est depuis plus de 65 ans, le premier organisme de formation des actifs, salariés et demandeurs d’emploi. Sa dimension nationale en fait l'un des principaux acteurs de la politique de l'emploi et de la formation professionnelle. UNE FORMATION UTILE ET PERFORMANTE, AU SERVICE DES ENTREPRISES L’Afpa propose une large gamme de formations qualifiantes et certifiantes, immédiatement utiles sur le marché de l’emploi, dans une logique de formation tout au long de la vie : insertion, reconversion, professionnalisation. Elle forme prioritairement aux métiers qui recrutent, considérant que la formation doit être un investissement pour les entreprises, et une arme majeure de lutte contre le chômage. Six mois après une formation Afpa, 60% des stagiaires ont retrouvé un emploi. UNE OFFRE DE FORMATION RENOUVELEE, EN LIGNE AVEC LE CPF Parce qu’aujourd’hui la formation devient plus que jamais la responsabilité de tous, l’Afpa déploie une nouvelle offre plus souple, modulaire et compatible avec le Compte Personnel de Formation (CPF). 200 ingénieurs de formation assurent une veille permanente pour répondre au double impératif de l’efficience économique et de l’utilité sociale et être toujours plus proche des besoins des entreprises et de l'évolution des métiers.

Loading…

NEWS

Ing. Michal Ondracek CyberSecurity News

Latest updates, reports, and threat intel affecting the global network.

Loading…

CVE

Latest

Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

CVE-2026-86564

SUMMARY

A flaw was found in DPDK lib/vhost. Missing length validation before reading command_data in the virtio-net control-queue handler can cause an out-of-bounds read and a host process crash.

Published

Date2026-09-08

Updated

Date2026-09-08

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.3)

cvss3

Base Score: 3.3

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L

Impact Score

1.4

Exploitability

1.8

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-55250

SUMMARY

Maravel, a PHP framework oriented towards dependency injection, prior to version 10.74.0 has a high-severity Token Replay Vulnerability arising from a structural lifecycle mismatch between stateless token validation engines and high-performance relational caching layers. Any application with low cache memory that causes premature eviction to free up memory and applications running macropay-solutions/maravel-framework that utilize tymon/jwt-auth for API token authentication and blacklist management or any other package that does the same may be affected. This architectural risk might also impact native Laravel applications utilizing cache tags under specific volatile or eviction-capped environments. tymon/jwt-auth automatically probes for cache tag support. If found, it forcefully wraps 14-day token blacklist entries (jti) inside a relational tymon.jwt tag. In environments where the O(1) Atomic Lazy Eviction model is active — either natively inside Maravel-Framework v20.x or manually backported into v10.x via the explicit DI container singletons provided in PR #104 (App\Cache\TaggedCache and App\Cache\TagSet) — a strict global tracking ceiling (Container::TAGGED_CACHE_TTL_CAP_SECONDS) of 7,200 seconds (2 hours) is enforced to secure the system against memory index bloat. This ceiling forcefully truncates the 14-day blacklist lifespan down to a maximum of 2 hours, after which individual tracking keys naturally expire and disappear from the active cache window. Furthermore, because the optimized engine implements a generational version matrix to achieve O(1) flush speeds, any programmatic or manual invocation of a tag flush or reset (e.g., Cache::tags([...])->flush()) instantly bumps the internal atomic master version pointer. This shifts the computed cryptographic composite hash (sha1($this->tags->getNamespace())) for all overlapping components, rendering the entire existing index immediately unreachable. Consequently, through either natural 2-hour expiration or an intervening tag flush execution (like the cache naturally cleaning old values to free up memory), the invalidation state records are entirely wiped out. Because the tokens' physical cryptographic signatures remain structurally valid for up to 14 days, stolen, hijacked, or legitimately logged-out tokens are instantly and silently resurrected across the entire API gateway, leaving the application critically vulnerable to widespread Token Replay Attacks. Because this issue is caused by an upstream architectural assumption within the tymon/jwt-auth package rather than a core defect inside the framework, there is no direct framework version upgrade that can safely bypass this lifecycle collision without breaking business cache recycling bounds. Maravel version 10.74.0 introduced a way to backport the new fixed tagged cache from 20.x into 10.x by resolving TagSet and TaggedCache from DI, which is how this latent architectural lifecycle vulnerability was discovered. Users must apply the decoupled configuration workaround outlined below. As a workaround, make sure that cache memory size does not generate early natural evictions from cache to free up space, deleting blacklisted jwt ids before they expire. Applications must decouple flat authentication vectors from the relational tagging subsystem. This forces token identifiers to write directly to the primary cache keyspace as flat, un-tagged key-value pairs where they securely retain their unclipped 14-day lifecycle.

Published

Date2026-09-08

Updated

Date2026-09-08

RISK INFORMATION (Score: )

cvss4

Base Score: 8.7

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Impact Score

Exploitability

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-53639

SUMMARY

Sylius is an Open Source eCommerce Framework on Symfony. Starting in version 2.0.0 and prior to version 2.0.18, 2.1.15, and 2.2.6, the `GET /api/v2/shop/payment-requests/{hash}` and `PUT /api/v2/shop/payment-requests/{hash}` endpoints look up the payment request solely by the hash from the URL. No ownership check is performed against the authenticated customer or the underlying order. An attacker who obtains a payment request hash can read the payment request and, through the `payment` IRI in the response, recover the underlying order's `tokenValue` (which itself grants access to the full order, items, addresses, customer email, totals); and/or update the payment request payload (e.g. `target_path`, `after_path`). These fields are used by the front-end controller to redirect the user after the payment, so an attacker can flip them to an attacker-controlled URL and intercept the buyer. The hash is a UUID, so it has to be obtained out-of-band (logs, shared links, referrer headers, a co-located client), but once it is known no other credential is required, neither authentication nor knowledge of the order token. The creation endpoint `POST /api/v2/shop/orders/{tokenValue}/payment-requests` shares the same flaw: it resolves the target order solely from the `tokenValue` in the URL without verifying that the caller owns the order. The issue is fixed in versions 2.0.18, 2.1.15, and 2.2.6. As a workaround, add a query extension that filters the `GET` operation; decorate the `PUT` state provider, guard the `POST` creation endpoint with a command-bus middleware, and wire the services.

Published

Date2026-09-08

Updated

Date2026-09-08

RISK INFORMATION (Score: )

cvss4

Base Score: 6.3

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Impact Score

Exploitability

REFERENCES

https://github.com/Sylius/Sylius/security/advisories/GHSA-mr9r-h354-966r

CVE-2026-53638

SUMMARY

Sylius is an Open Source eCommerce Framework on Symfony. Starting in version 2.0.0 and prior to version 2.0.18, 2.1.15, and 2.2.6, an authorization bypass vulnerability exists in the shop account API. The `PATCH /api/v2/shop/account/orders/{tokenValue}/payments/{paymentId}` endpoint, used by an authenticated shop customer to change the payment method of an order that has been placed but not yet paid (state `STATE_NEW`), does not validate that the chosen payment method is enabled for the order's channel. The equivalent checkout endpoint (`PATCH /api/v2/shop/orders/{tokenValue}/payments/{paymentId}`) correctly rejects out-of-channel payment methods with `HTTP 422`; the account endpoint silently accepts them and returns `HTTP 200`. An authenticated customer can therefore assign any globally enabled payment method to their own placed order, including methods that the store operator has explicitly excluded from that channel. The issue is fixed in versions: 2.0.18, 2.1.15, 2.2.6 and above. As a workaround, decorate the `Sylius\Bundle\ApiBundle\Changer\PaymentMethodChangerInterface` service in the application.

Published

Date2026-09-08

Updated

Date2026-09-08

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)

cvss3

Base Score: 4.3

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N

Impact Score

1.4

Exploitability

2.8

REFERENCES

https://github.com/Sylius/Sylius/security/advisories/GHSA-6955-hrm5-c4qp

CVE-2026-53637

SUMMARY

Sylius is an Open Source eCommerce Framework on Symfony. Versions 2.0.0 through 2.0.17, 2.1.0 through 2.1.14, and 2.2.0 through 2.2.5 contain an improper workflow enforcement vulnerability in the cart `FormComponent`. When an order is completed while its cart page remains open, the stale LiveComponent does not detect the order’s changed state and continues to permit cart actions, allowing an authenticated customer to modify or permanently delete an already completed order. Versions 2.0.18, 2.1.15, and 2.2.6 contain a patch. As a workaround, deployments can copy the patched `FormComponent` into the application's `src/` directory and override the `sylius_shop.twig.component.cart.form` service definition to use that class.

Published

Date2026-09-08

Updated

Date2026-09-08

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)

cvss3

Base Score: 6.5

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N

Impact Score

3.6

Exploitability

2.8

REFERENCES

https://github.com/Sylius/Sylius/security/advisories/GHSA-5597-7rmh-97q5

Loading…

API

Access Data Using Our API

Get company history

curl -i -X GET 'https://api.rankiteo.com/underwriter-getcompany-history?
linkedin_id=axa' -H 'apikey: YOUR_API_KEY_HERE'

Try It API Documentation Rapid

MEASURE

What Do We Measure ?

Incident

Finding

Grade

Digital Assets

Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.

These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:

Network SecurityIdentify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.

SBOM (Software Bill of Materials)Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.

CMDB (Configuration Management Database)Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.

Threat IntelligenceLeverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.

Rankiteo

By Rankiteo

★ ★ ★ ★ ★

View on G2.com

Rankiteo is a unified scoring and risk platform that analyzes billions of signals weekly to help organizations gain faster, more actionable insights into emerging threats. Empowering teams to outpace adversaries and reduce exposure.

View latest plans →View all security reports →

MILESTONEG

Users
Love Us

Loading…

Badge your company to reduce your risk score and your cyber insurance costs!

Trusted by insurers. Chosen by leaders.

Ing. Michal Ondracek Vendor Cyber Rating & Cyber Score

IMO A.I CyberSecurity Scoring

Ing. Michal Ondracek CyberSecurity News & History

IMO Company Scoring based on AI Models

Cyber Incidents Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

Incident Predictions locked

A.I Risk Score Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

A.I. Risk Score Predictions locked

Underwriter Stats for IMO

Incidents vs Professional Training and Coaching Industry Avg (This Year)

Incidents vs All-Companies Average (This Year)

Incident Types IMO vs Professional Training and Coaching Industry Avg (This Year)

Incident History - IMO (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ing. Michal Ondracek Subsidiaries

Parent Company

IMO

Ing. Michal Ondracek Similar Companies

My own company (I am self-employed)

AFPA

Ing. Michal Ondracek CyberSecurity News

Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Access Data Using Our API

What Do We Measure ?

These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:

Rankiteo

Ing. Michal Ondracek CyberSecurity News & History

IMO Company Scoring based on AI Models

Cyber Incidents Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

Incident Predictions locked

A.I Risk Score Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

A.I. Risk Score Predictions locked

Underwriter Stats for IMO

Incidents vs Professional Training and Coaching Industry Avg (This Year)

Incidents vs All-Companies Average (This Year)

Incident Types IMO vs Professional Training and Coaching Industry Avg (This Year)

Incident History - IMO (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ing. Michal Ondracek Subsidiaries

Parent Company

IMO

Ing. Michal Ondracek Similar Companies

My own company (I am self-employed)

AFPA

Ing. Michal Ondracek CyberSecurity News

Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Access Data Using Our API

What Do We Measure ?

These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:

Rankiteo