Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Industrial Credit Union » IND1764878221

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (IND1764878221)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-90
Company Score Before Incident671 / 1000
Company Score After Incident581 / 1000
Company LinkView Industrial Credit Union Profile
INCIDENT NUMBERIND1764878221
Type of Cyber IncidentBreach
ATTACK VECTORThird-Party Vendor Compromise
DATA EXPOSEDSensitive personally identifiable information
INCIDENT DATE03/12/2025
STATUSOngoing (Investigated by Shamis & Gentile P.A.)

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Industrial Credit Union's Breach and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Industrial Credit Union Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Industrial Credit Union breach identified under incident ID IND1764878221.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Industrial Credit Union's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/industrial-credit-union, the number of followers: 567, the industry type: Banking and the number of employees: 77 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 671 and after the incident was 581 with a difference of -90 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Industrial Credit Union and their customers.

On 26 November 2025, Industrial Credit Union of Whatcom County disclosed Data Breach issues under the banner "Industrial Credit Union of Whatcom County (Go Marquis) Data Breach".

Industrial Credit Union of Whatcom County disclosed a significant data breach involving its third-party communication delivery partner, Go Marquis.

The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting Go Marquis (third-party vendor systems), and exposing Sensitive personally identifiable information, with nearly 24,526 records at risk.

In response, and stakeholders are being briefed through Notice submitted to Washington Attorney General’s office.

The case underscores how Ongoing (Investigated by Shamis & Gentile P.A.), with advisories going out to stakeholders covering Affected individuals may be eligible for compensation.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Trusted Relationship (T1199) with high confidence (90%), with evidence including third-party vendor compromise (Go Marquis), and unauthorized access to Go Marquiss systems. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Steal Application Access Token (T1528) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating compromise of sensitive member information via third-party systems. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate to high confidence (80%), with evidence including sensitive personally identifiable information exposed, and 24,526 individuals impacted and Transfer Data to Cloud Account (T1537) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating third-party vendor (Go Marquis) systems compromised. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Destruction (T1485) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating high identity theft risk for affected individuals and Data Encrypted for Impact (T1486) with lower confidence (30%), supported by evidence indicating no evidence of ransomware, but data compromise occurred. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Sources & References