Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Indian Health Board of Minneapolis, Inc. » IND1769569769

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (IND1769569769)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-64
Company Score Before Incident761 / 1000
Company Score After Incident697 / 1000
Company LinkView Indian Health Board of Minneapolis, Inc. Profile
INCIDENT NUMBERIND1769569769
Type of Cyber IncidentBreach
ATTACK VECTORNA
DATA EXPOSEDPersonally Identifiable Information (PII), Protected...
INCIDENT DATE14/12/2025
STATUSUnder investigation

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Indian Health Board of Minneapolis, Inc.'s Breach and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Indian Health Board of Minneapolis, Inc. Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Indian Health Board of Minneapolis, Inc. breach identified under incident ID IND1769569769.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Indian Health Board of Minneapolis, Inc.'s information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/indian-health-board-of-minneapolis-inc-, the number of followers: 945, the industry type: Hospitals and Health Care and the number of employees: 70 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 761 and after the incident was 697 with a difference of -64 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Indian Health Board of Minneapolis, Inc. and their customers.

On 15 December 2025, Indian Health Board of Minneapolis disclosed Data Breach issues under the banner "Indian Health Board of Minneapolis Data Breach".

The Indian Health Board of Minneapolis disclosed a data breach on December 15, 2025, which may have exposed sensitive personally identifiable information (PII) and protected health information (PHI) of current and former patients.

The disruption is felt across the environment, and exposing Personally Identifiable Information (PII), Protected Health Information (PHI).

Formal response steps have not been shared publicly yet.

The case underscores how Under investigation, with advisories going out to stakeholders covering Affected individuals may face risks such as identity theft, fraud, and privacy violations. They may qualify for compensation for damages, including time spent addressing the breach, emotional distress, and out-of-pocket expenses.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating sensitive PII and PHI of current and former patients exposed and Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating healthcare data security vulnerabilities mentioned. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Unsecured Credentials (T1552) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating pII and PHI exposed, implying possible credential compromise. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating sensitive PII and PHI of patients compromised. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating data breach impacting thousands of patients disclosed. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Stored Data Manipulation (T1565.001) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating identity theft and fraud risks for affected individuals and Data Destruction (T1485) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating potential privacy violations and legal liabilities. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Valid Accounts (60%)
Exploit Public-Facing Application (50%)
Credential Access
Unsecured Credentials (70%)
Collection
Data from Local System (80%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (70%)
Impact
Stored Data Manipulation (50%)
Data Destruction (40%)

Sources & References