Comparison Overview
IGT Global Lottery

IGT Global Lottery
66 Seymour Street, London, England, W1H 5BT, GB
Last Update: 29/01/2026
IGT is the leading retail and iLottery integrated platform supplier, delivering world class omnichannel products, services and solutions to lotteries wherever they are on the retail and digital journey. IGT delivers game innovation to lotteries worldwide, in retail an...

ServiceNow
2225 Lawson Lane, Santa Clara, 95054, US
Last Update: 11/10/2026
ServiceNow (NYSE: NOW) makes the world work better for everyone. Our cloud-based platform and solutions help digitize and unify organizations so that they can find smarter, faster, better ways to make work flow. So employees and customers can be more connected, more inn...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

IGT Global Lottery







ServiceNow






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for IGT Global Lottery in 2026.
Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)
ServiceNow has 586.27% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - IGT Global Lottery (X = Date, Y = Severity)
IGT Global Lottery cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - ServiceNow (X = Date, Y = Severity)
ServiceNow cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

IGT Global Lottery

ServiceNow
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
Heym from 0.0.55 before 0.0.121 contains a privilege escalation vulnerability that allows shared collaborators to overwrite a workflow's error_workflow_id because the field is missing from OWNER_ONLY_EXECUTION_FIELDS. Attackers can point the error workflow to their own workflow with an HTTP node, and when the parent workflow errors the owner's decrypted credentials are injected and exfiltrated.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.10 contains a quadratic complexity denial of service vulnerability in the SMTP client reply parser in SMTPConnection._onData and isPartialResponse. A malicious SMTP server or on-path attacker can stream continuation lines without a completion line before authentication, blocking the Node.js event loop and exhausting memory.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.10 contains a denial of service vulnerability in MessageParser.parseHeaders that allows users to exhaust CPU through quadratic header unfolding. Attackers can supply large recipient lists or long headers that fold into tens of thousands of continuation lines, blocking the Node.js event loop during DKIM signing.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.13 contains an improper input validation vulnerability in its address parser that fails to strip RFC 5322 comments inside angle-bracket addresses. Attackers can supply recipients like a display name with a parenthesized comment in the domain, so illegal characters reach envelope.to and RCPT TO, causing rejected delivery or parser interpretation conflicts that bypass domain allow-lists.
Nodemailer 3.0.0 before 10.0.13 has a regular expression denial of service in SMTPConnection._actionEHLO, whose four AUTH mechanism detection regexes contain overlapping whitespace sub-patterns that backtrack quadratically. A malicious or man-in-the-middle SMTP server can reply to EHLO with 250-AUTH, a long whitespace run and a non-matching token, blocking the Node.js event loop for tens of seconds to hours before authentication.