Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (IFO1780597495)
The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.
Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis
Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis
- Timeline of iFood's Breach and lateral movement inside company's environment.
- Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
- How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
- How this cyber incident impacts iFood Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
- Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.
Full Incident Analysis Transcript
In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the iFood breach identified under incident ID IFO1780597495.
The analysis begins with a detailed overview of iFood's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/ifood-, the number of followers: 1926945, the industry type: Software Development and the number of employees: 13517 employees
After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 802 and after the incident was 742 with a difference of -60 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.
In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on iFood and their customers.
On 03 June 2026, iFood disclosed Data Breach issues under the banner "iFood Data Breach Exposes 1.2 Million Brazilian Users’ Personal Information".
Brazilian food delivery giant iFood confirmed a data breach in December 2025, affecting 1.2 million users (approximately 2% of its customer base).
The disruption is felt across the environment, and exposing Names, phone numbers, addresses, CPF numbers, with nearly 1.2 million (officially); 43.8 million (claimed by hacker) records at risk.
In response, teams activated the incident response plan, moved swiftly to contain the threat with measures like Security systems contained the breach swiftly, and stakeholders are being briefed through Advised users to rely only on official app communications.
The case underscores how Ongoing, with advisories going out to stakeholders covering Advised users to rely only on official app communications.
Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.
The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.
MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis
Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating food delivery giant iFood confirmed a data breach...accessed names, phone numbers and Trusted Relationship (T1199) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating no details on attack vector; potential trusted partner compromise. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Unsecured Credentials: Credentials In Files (T1552.001) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating cPF numbers (taxpayer IDs) accessed; may have been stored insecurely. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating hackers accessed names, phone numbers, addresses, and CPF numbers and Data from Information Repositories (T1213) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating 1.2 million users personal information compromised. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating hacker bacen claimed to have stolen 43.8 million records and Exfiltration Over Web Service (T1567) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating data breach affecting 1.2 million users; exfiltration implied. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Defacement: Internal Defacement (T1491.001) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating company disclosed the incident publicly; reputational impact and Search Victim-Owned Websites (T1594) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating hacker bacen threatened to leak data unless ransom paid. Under the Command and Control tactic, the analysis identified Application Layer Protocol: Web Protocols (T1071.001) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating hacker bacen communicated ransom demand; likely C2 over web. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.
Sources & References
- iFood Rankiteo Cyber Incident Details: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/ifood-/incident/IFO1780597495
- iFood CyberSecurity Rating page: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/ifood-
- iFood Rankiteo Cyber Incident Blog Article: https://blog.rankiteo.com/ifo1780597495-ifood-breach-december-2025/
- iFood CyberSecurity Score History: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/ifood-/history
- iFood CyberSecurity Incident Source: https://hackread.com/ifood-confirms-data-breach-brazil-users/
- Rankiteo A.I CyberSecurity Rating methodology: https://www.rankiteo.com/Images/rankiteo_algo.pdf
- Rankiteo TPRM Scoring methodology: https://static.rankiteo.com/model/rankiteo_tprm_methodology.pdf