Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Identity Theft Resource Center - Nonprofit » IDT1772065558

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (IDT1772065558)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-60
Company Score Before Incident376 / 1000
Company Score After Incident316 / 1000
Company LinkView Identity Theft Resource Center - Nonprofit Profile
INCIDENT NUMBERIDT1772065558
Type of Cyber IncidentBreach
ATTACK VECTORAI-fueled attacks
DATA EXPOSEDTrue
INCIDENT DATE24/02/2026
STATUSpublished

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Identity Theft Resource Center - Nonprofit's Breach and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Identity Theft Resource Center - Nonprofit Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Identity Theft Resource Center - Nonprofit breach identified under incident ID IDT1772065558.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Identity Theft Resource Center - Nonprofit's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/idtheftcenter, the number of followers: 3258, the industry type: Consumer Services and the number of employees: 30 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 376 and after the incident was 316 with a difference of -60 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Identity Theft Resource Center - Nonprofit and their customers.

A newly reported cybersecurity incident, "Record-Breaking Data Breaches in 2025 Highlight Growing Cybersecurity Challenges", has drawn attention.

In 2025, data breaches and compromises surged to an all-time high, with 3,322 publicly reported incidents—a staggering increase from just over 100 in 2005 according to the Identity Theft Resource Center (ITRC) in its 20th annual report.

The disruption is felt across the environment, and exposing True.

Formal response steps have not been shared publicly yet.

The case underscores how teams are taking away lessons such as Lack of transparency in breach notifications is a major concern; companies often fail to provide critical details about breaches. Consumer behavior is shifting, with 100% of recipients reading breach notices and proactively seeking risk information.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating persistent vulnerabilities in corporate security practices and Trusted Relationship (T1199) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating 81% of small businesses experienced a cyberattack or data breach. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Compromise Accounts (T1586) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating aI-fueled attacks and identity theft risk highlighted and Brute Force (T1110) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating persistent vulnerabilities in corporate security practices. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating personally identifiable information compromised in breaches. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating 3,322 publicly reported data breach incidents in 2025 and Transfer Data to Cloud Account (T1537) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating lack of transparency in breach notifications. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Destruction (T1485) with lower confidence (30%), supported by evidence indicating operational impact and brand reputation impact noted and Defacement (T1491) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating lack of transparency in breach disclosures. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Exploit Public-Facing Application (50%)
Trusted Relationship (40%)
Credential Access
Compromise Accounts (60%)
Brute Force (50%)
Collection
Data from Local System (70%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (60%)
Transfer Data to Cloud Account (40%)
Impact
Data Destruction (30%)
Defacement (40%)

Sources & References