Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Identity Theft Resource Center - Nonprofit » IDT1769504512

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (IDT1769504512)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-246
Company Score Before Incident647 / 1000
Company Score After Incident401 / 1000
Company LinkView Identity Theft Resource Center - Nonprofit Profile
INCIDENT NUMBERIDT1769504512
Type of Cyber IncidentBreach
ATTACK VECTORweak passwords, outdated software, human error
DATA EXPOSEDNA
INCIDENT DATE15/06/2025
STATUSpublished

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Identity Theft Resource Center - Nonprofit's Breach and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Identity Theft Resource Center - Nonprofit Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Identity Theft Resource Center - Nonprofit breach identified under incident ID IDT1769504512.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Identity Theft Resource Center - Nonprofit's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/idtheftcenter, the number of followers: 3258, the industry type: Consumer Services and the number of employees: 30 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 647 and after the incident was 401 with a difference of -246 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Identity Theft Resource Center - Nonprofit and their customers.

On 01 December 2024, a cybersecurity incident called "Rising Cybersecurity Threats for Small Businesses" came to light.

Small businesses are increasingly adopting cloud computing, AI, and digital tools, leading to heightened cybersecurity risks.

The disruption is felt across the environment, plus an estimated financial loss of $250,000 - $1,000,000.

Formal response steps have not been shared publicly yet.

The case underscores how teams are taking away lessons such as Preventive steps such as enforcing multi-factor authentication (MFA), regular employee training, and secure data backups are far less costly than recovery efforts, and recommending next steps like enforce multi-factor authentication (MFA), conduct regular employee training and implement secure data backups.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating weak passwords...can be mitigated with proactive measures, Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating outdated software...heightened cybersecurity risks, and User Execution: Malicious File (T1204.002) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating human error factors that can be mitigated. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Brute Force: Password Guessing (T1110.001) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating weak passwords...common attack vectors and Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating 81% of U.S. small businesses experienced a breach. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating data breach...financial losses between $250,000 and $1M. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Destruction (T1485) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating financial losses...operational disruptions and Defacement: Internal Defacement (T1491.001) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating reputational damage...long-term operational disruptions. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Valid Accounts (80%)
Exploit Public-Facing Application (60%)
User Execution: Malicious File (70%)
Credential Access
Brute Force: Password Guessing (80%)
Valid Accounts (70%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (70%)
Impact
Data Destruction (50%)
Defacement: Internal Defacement (40%)

Sources & References