Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » IDrive Inc. » IDR1774520631

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (IDR1774520631)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-2
Company Score Before Incident752 / 1000
Company Score After Incident750 / 1000
INCIDENT NUMBERIDR1774520631
Type of Cyber IncidentVulnerability
ATTACK VECTORLocal
DATA EXPOSEDSensitive backup data
INCIDENT DATE25/03/2026
STATUSpublished

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of IDrive Inc.'s Vulnerability and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts IDrive Inc. Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the IDrive Inc. breach identified under incident ID IDR1774520631.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of IDrive Inc.'s information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/idrive, the number of followers: 4985, the industry type: Software Development and the number of employees: 125 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 752 and after the incident was 750 with a difference of -2 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on IDrive Inc. and their customers.

IDrive recently reported "Critical Privilege Escalation Flaw in IDrive Cloud Backup Client Exposes Windows Systems to Full Compromise", a noteworthy cybersecurity incident.

A newly disclosed vulnerability in the IDrive Cloud Backup Client for Windows, tracked as CVE-2026-1995, allows local attackers to escalate privileges to NT AUTHORITY\SYSTEM, granting full control over affected systems.

The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting Windows systems running IDrive Cloud Backup Client (desktop and server editions), and exposing Sensitive backup data.

In response, moved swiftly to contain the threat with measures like Restrict write permissions on the vulnerable directory (C:\ProgramData\IDrive), and began remediation that includes Deploy Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) solutions, enforce Group Policy controls to block unauthorized script execution.

The case underscores how teams are taking away lessons such as Critical need for timely patching and access control hardening in third-party backup solutions operating with elevated privileges, and recommending next steps like Restrict write permissions on the vulnerable directory, deploy EDR solutions, enforce Group Policy controls to block unauthorized script execution, and monitor suspicious activity.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Privilege Escalation tactic, the analysis identified Exploitation for Privilege Escalation (T1068) with high confidence (95%), supported by evidence indicating cVE-2026-1995 allows local attackers to escalate privileges to NT AUTHORITY\SYSTEM and Hijack Execution Flow: DLL Side-Loading (T1574.002) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating id_service.exe reads files from C such as \ProgramData\IDrive with weak access controls. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating exploitation requires authenticated local access, often achieved through phishing and Phishing: Spearphishing Attachment (T1566.001) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating exploitation condition often achieved through phishing. Under the Persistence tactic, the analysis identified Create or Modify System Process: Windows Service (T1543.003) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating id_service.exe background service runs with SYSTEM-level privileges. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Impair Defenses: Disable or Modify Tools (T1562.001) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating successful attacks could allow threat actors to disable security tools. Under the Lateral Movement tactic, the analysis identified Remote Services: Remote Desktop Protocol (T1021.001) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating move laterally within enterprise networks after privilege escalation. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating access sensitive backup data managed by IDrive Cloud Backup Client. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Encrypted for Impact (T1486) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating deploy malware or ransomware after privilege escalation. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Privilege Escalation
Exploitation for Privilege Escalation (95%)
Hijack Execution Flow: DLL Side-Loading (70%)
Initial Access
Valid Accounts (80%)
Phishing: Spearphishing Attachment (70%)
Persistence
Create or Modify System Process: Windows Service (80%)
Defense Evasion
Impair Defenses: Disable or Modify Tools (70%)
Lateral Movement
Remote Services: Remote Desktop Protocol (60%)
Collection
Data from Local System (80%)
Impact
Data Encrypted for Impact (60%)

Sources & References