Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » IDIS » IDI1769618820

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (IDI1769618820)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact+3
Company Score Before Incident748 / 1000
Company Score After Incident751 / 1000
Company LinkView IDIS Profile
INCIDENT NUMBERIDI1769618820
Type of Cyber IncidentVulnerability
ATTACK VECTORWebSocket communication exploitation via malicious webpage
DATA EXPOSEDNA
INCIDENT DATE31/12/2024
STATUSpublished

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of IDIS's Vulnerability and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts IDIS Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the IDIS breach identified under incident ID IDI1769618820.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of IDIS's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/idis-global, the number of followers: 6686, the industry type: Appliances, Electrical, and Electronics Manufacturing and the number of employees: 231 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 748 and after the incident was 751 with a difference of 3 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on IDIS and their customers.

IDIS Cloud Manager (ICM) Viewer users recently reported "Critical One-Click RCE Vulnerability in IDIS Cloud Manager Exposes Surveillance Systems", a noteworthy cybersecurity incident.

A severe vulnerability in IDIS Cloud Manager (ICM) Viewer (CVE-2025-12556, CVSS 8.7) allows attackers to achieve remote code execution (RCE) with a single click, compromising Windows systems used to monitor IDIS IP cameras.

The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting Windows systems running IDIS Cloud Manager (ICM) Viewer.

In response, moved swiftly to contain the threat with measures like Upgrade to ICM Viewer version 1.7.1 or uninstall the software if patching is not feasible, and began remediation that includes Patch management, review exposed surveillance management systems, harden local services.

The case underscores how teams are taking away lessons such as The flaw underscores the risks of cloud-connected security tools with inadequate input validation, particularly in critical infrastructure environments, and recommending next steps like Upgrade to ICM Viewer version 1.7.1 immediately, review exposed surveillance management systems, and harden local services.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Drive-by Compromise (T1189) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating tricking a user into visiting a malicious webpage containing JavaScript and User Execution: Malicious Link (T1204.001) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating no user interaction beyond clicking a link is required. Under the Execution tactic, the analysis identified Exploitation for Client Execution (T1203) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating remote code execution (RCE) with a single click via WebSocket exploitation and Command and Scripting Interpreter: Windows Command Shell (T1059.003) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating injecting malicious Chromium command-line flags to execute arbitrary code. Under the Privilege Escalation tactic, the analysis identified Exploitation for Privilege Escalation (T1068) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating full system compromise of Windows host managing IDIS surveillance. Under the Lateral Movement tactic, the analysis identified Exploitation of Remote Services (T1210) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating potential lateral movement within networks via compromised systems. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating local WebSocket service (CWGService.exe)listening on localhost such as 16140 and Deobfuscate/Decode Files or Information (T1140) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating hard-coded encryption key for WebSocket messages. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Resource Hijacking (T1496) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating compromised systems could provide access to other surveillance assets. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Drive-by Compromise (90%)
User Execution: Malicious Link (90%)
Execution
Exploitation for Client Execution (90%)
Command and Scripting Interpreter: Windows Command Shell (80%)
Privilege Escalation
Exploitation for Privilege Escalation (70%)
Lateral Movement
Exploitation of Remote Services (80%)
Defense Evasion
Valid Accounts (60%)
Deobfuscate/Decode Files or Information (50%)
Impact
Resource Hijacking (70%)

Sources & References