Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » IDERA Software » FLAIDE1772239249

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (FLAIDE1772239249)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-77
Company Score Before Incident754 / 1000
Company Score After Incident677 / 1000
Company LinkView IDERA Software Profile
INCIDENT NUMBERFLAIDE1772239249
Type of Cyber IncidentBreach
ATTACK VECTORUnauthorized access to third-party file-hosting system
DATA EXPOSEDSensitive personal and financial information
INCIDENT DATE22/08/2025
STATUSOngoing

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of IDERA Software's Breach and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts IDERA Software Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the IDERA Software breach identified under incident ID FLAIDE1772239249.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of IDERA Software's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/idera-software, the number of followers: 20298, the industry type: Software Development and the number of employees: 277 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 754 and after the incident was 677 with a difference of -77 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on IDERA Software and their customers.

On 26 February 2026, Idera (Flash Charm Inc.) disclosed Data Breach issues under the banner "Idera Data Breach Exposes Sensitive Personal Information of Over 2,000 Individuals".

Shamis & Gentile P.A.

The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting Third-party file-hosting system, and exposing Sensitive personal and financial information, with nearly 2015 records at risk.

In response, moved swiftly to contain the threat with measures like Breach contained, and stakeholders are being briefed through Notification via U.S. mail to affected individuals.

The case underscores how Ongoing, teams are taking away lessons such as Highlights risks associated with third-party file-hosting systems, particularly for organizations handling sensitive personal and financial data, with advisories going out to stakeholders covering Notification via U.S. mail to affected individuals on February 26, 2026.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Trusted Relationship (T1199) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized access to a third-party file-hosting system. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Steal Application Access Token (T1528) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating third-party file-hosting system access implies possible token abuse and Unsecured Credentials: Credentials In Files (T1552.001) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating exposed sensitive data includes financial account numbers. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating names, SSNs, driver’s license numbers, financial data compromised and Data from Information Repositories (T1213) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating third-party file-hosting system contained sensitive data. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating 2,015 individuals data exposed; exfiltration likely and Transfer Data to Cloud Account (T1537) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating third-party file-hosting system may have facilitated exfiltration. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Destruction (T1485) with lower confidence (30%), supported by evidence indicating no evidence of data destruction, but breach implies risk and Data Manipulation: Transmitted Data Manipulation (T1565.002) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized access may have altered or stolen data. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Trusted Relationship (90%)
Credential Access
Steal Application Access Token (70%)
Unsecured Credentials: Credentials In Files (60%)
Collection
Data from Local System (80%)
Data from Information Repositories (90%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (70%)
Transfer Data to Cloud Account (50%)
Impact
Data Destruction (30%)
Data Manipulation: Transmitted Data Manipulation (40%)

Sources & References