Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Hydromax USA » AKZINSHYDPOWWES1775047452

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (AKZINSHYDPOWWES1775047452)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-114
Company Score Before Incident726 / 1000
Company Score After Incident612 / 1000
INCIDENT NUMBERAKZINSHYDPOWWES1775047452
Type of Cyber IncidentRansomware
ATTACK VECTORNA
DATA EXPOSED242 TB
INCIDENT DATE28/02/2026
STATUSOngoing

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Hydromax USA's Ransomware and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Hydromax USA Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Hydromax USA breach identified under incident ID AKZINSHYDPOWWES1775047452.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Hydromax USA's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/hydromax-usa, the number of followers: 3318, the industry type: Environmental Services and the number of employees: 335 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 726 and after the incident was 612 with a difference of -114 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Hydromax USA and their customers.

On 31 March 2026, City of Minot (Water Treatment Plant) disclosed Ransomware issues under the banner "March 2026 Ransomware Surge: Critical Infrastructure Under Fire".

March 2026 marked a sharp escalation in ransomware activity, with 780 attacks recorded (a 13% increase from February) and the second-highest monthly total since February 2025.

The disruption is felt across the environment, and exposing 242 TB.

Formal response steps have not been shared publicly yet.

The case underscores how Ongoing.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating targeted campaigns against critical sectors, External Remote Services (T1133) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating utility sector saw a staggering 630% spike, and Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating state-sponsored and financially motivated threat actors. Under the Execution tactic, the analysis identified User Execution: Malicious File (T1204.002) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware activity...780 attacks recorded and Command and Scripting Interpreter (T1059) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating operational halts (manufacturing). Under the Persistence tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating high-value, high-disruption targets and Create or Modify System Process: Windows Service (T1543.003) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating disruptions to accounting and communications. Under the Privilege Escalation tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating state-sponsored threat actors prioritizing high-impact disruptions and Exploitation for Privilege Escalation (T1068) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating critical infrastructure under fire. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Obfuscated Files or Information (T1027) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware gangs leveraging data theft, operational disruption and Impair Defenses: Disable or Modify Tools (T1562.001) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating operational halts (manufacturing). Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified OS Credential Dumping (T1003) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating 242 TB of data was stolen and Credentials from Password Stores (T1555) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating high-value targets (utilities, government). Under the Discovery tactic, the analysis identified Account Discovery (T1087) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating state-sponsored threat actors prioritizing high-impact disruptions and File and Directory Discovery (T1083) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating 242 TB of data stolen. Under the Lateral Movement tactic, the analysis identified Remote Services: Remote Desktop Protocol (T1021.001) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating utility sector saw a 630% spike in attacks and Remote Services: SMB/Windows Admin Shares (T1021.002) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating operational halts (manufacturing). Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating 242 TB of data was stolen and Data from Network Shared Drive (T1039) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating pEAR’s attack on Monmouth University alone exposed 16 TB. Under the Command and Control tactic, the analysis identified Application Layer Protocol: Web Protocols (T1071.001) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware gangs leveraging data theft, operational disruption and Proxy (T1090) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating state-sponsored threat actors. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating 242 TB of data was stolen and Exfiltration Over Web Service: Exfiltration to Cloud Storage (T1567.002) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating aiLock claimed the largest single haul (43 TB). Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Encrypted for Impact (T1486) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware activity...780 attacks recorded, Data Destruction (T1485) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating operational halts (manufacturing), and Defacement: Internal Defacement (T1491.001) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating disruptions to accounting and communications. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Exploit Public-Facing Application (60%)
External Remote Services (70%)
Valid Accounts (80%)
Execution
User Execution: Malicious File (90%)
Command and Scripting Interpreter (70%)
Persistence
Valid Accounts (80%)
Create or Modify System Process: Windows Service (60%)
Privilege Escalation
Valid Accounts (80%)
Exploitation for Privilege Escalation (60%)
Defense Evasion
Obfuscated Files or Information (90%)
Impair Defenses: Disable or Modify Tools (70%)
Credential Access
OS Credential Dumping (80%)
Credentials from Password Stores (70%)
Discovery
Account Discovery (80%)
File and Directory Discovery (70%)
Lateral Movement
Remote Services: Remote Desktop Protocol (80%)
Remote Services: SMB/Windows Admin Shares (70%)
Collection
Data from Local System (90%)
Data from Network Shared Drive (80%)
Command and Control
Application Layer Protocol: Web Protocols (90%)
Proxy (70%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (90%)
Exfiltration Over Web Service: Exfiltration to Cloud Storage (70%)
Impact
Data Encrypted for Impact (90%)
Data Destruction (70%)
Defacement: Internal Defacement (60%)