Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Hutt City Council » HUT1777501436

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (HUT1777501436)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-72
Company Score Before Incident754 / 1000
Company Score After Incident682 / 1000
INCIDENT NUMBERHUT1777501436
Type of Cyber IncidentBreach
ATTACK VECTORPhishing
DATA EXPOSEDPersonal and financial data
INCIDENT DATE28/02/2026
STATUSpublished

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Hutt City Council's Breach and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Hutt City Council Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Hutt City Council breach identified under incident ID HUT1777501436.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Hutt City Council's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/hutt-city-council, the number of followers: 2000, the industry type: Government Relations Services and the number of employees: 499 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 754 and after the incident was 682 with a difference of -72 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Hutt City Council and their customers.

Hutt City Council recently reported "Hutt City Council Phishing Attack Exposes Personal and Financial Data", a noteworthy cybersecurity incident.

In March, the Hutt City Council in New Zealand’s North Island fell victim to a phishing attack that compromised sensitive data.

The disruption is felt across the environment, and exposing Personal and financial data, with nearly 737 records at risk.

In response, and began remediation that includes Enhanced monitoring, updated security protocols, additional staff training, and stakeholders are being briefed through Public apology and notifications to affected individuals.

The case underscores how teams are taking away lessons such as Growing threat of AI-driven cyberattacks enabling automation of scams, evasion of detection, and adaptation to defenses, and recommending next steps like Strengthen cybersecurity measures, including robust security practices to prevent future breaches, with advisories going out to stakeholders covering Advised on necessary steps to mitigate risks.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Phishing (T1566) with high confidence (95%), supported by evidence indicating fell victim to a phishing attack that compromised sensitive data, Phishing: Spearphishing Attachment (T1566.001) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating phishing attack exposed personal and financial data, and Phishing: Spearphishing Link (T1566.002) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating attack vector identified as Phishing. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Brute Force (T1110) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating phishing attack likely led to credential compromise and Unsecured Credentials (T1552) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating identity details and financial information exposed. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating identity details of five individuals and financial information of 732 people exposed and Data from Information Repositories (T1213) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating personal and financial data compromised via phishing. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating data breach exposed identity and financial details of 737 individuals and Exfiltration Over Alternative Protocol (T1048) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating no group claimed responsibility, suggesting covert exfiltration. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Destruction (T1485) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating distress caused to affected individuals and Data Manipulation (T1565) with lower confidence (30%), supported by evidence indicating identity theft and payment information risk identified. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Masquerading (T1036) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating aI-driven cyberattacks enable criminals to evade detection and Impair Defenses: Disable or Modify Tools (T1562.001) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating council strengthened cybersecurity measures post-incident. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Phishing (95%)
Phishing: Spearphishing Attachment (70%)
Phishing: Spearphishing Link (70%)
Credential Access
Brute Force (50%)
Unsecured Credentials (60%)
Collection
Data from Local System (80%)
Data from Information Repositories (70%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (70%)
Exfiltration Over Alternative Protocol (60%)
Impact
Data Destruction (40%)
Data Manipulation (30%)
Defense Evasion
Masquerading (60%)
Impair Defenses: Disable or Modify Tools (50%)

Sources & References