What is the official website of Humanitarian Policy Group ?

The official website of Humanitarian Policy Group is https://odi.org/en/about/our-work/humanitarian-policy-group/.

What is Humanitarian Policy Group's cybersecurity risk score?

Humanitarian Policy Group has an AI-generated cybersecurity risk score of 756 out of 1000, indicating a Fair security posture according to Rankiteo's assessment.

How many security incidents has Humanitarian Policy Group experienced?

According to Rankiteo, Humanitarian Policy Group currently holds 0 security badges, indicating that no recognized compliance certifications are currently verified for the organization.

Has Humanitarian Policy Group been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents ?

According to Rankiteo, Humanitarian Policy Group has not been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents, and no incident IDs are currently listed for the organization.

Does Humanitarian Policy Group have SOC 2 Type 1 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, Humanitarian Policy Group is not certified under SOC 2 Type 1.

Does Humanitarian Policy Group have SOC 2 Type 2 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, Humanitarian Policy Group does not hold a SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Does Humanitarian Policy Group comply with GDPR ?

According to Rankiteo, Humanitarian Policy Group is not listed as GDPR compliant.

Does Humanitarian Policy Group have PCI DSS certification ?

According to Rankiteo, Humanitarian Policy Group does not currently maintain PCI DSS compliance.

Does Humanitarian Policy Group comply with HIPAA ?

According to Rankiteo, Humanitarian Policy Group is not compliant with HIPAA regulations.

Does Humanitarian Policy Group have ISO 27001 certification ?

According to Rankiteo,Humanitarian Policy Group is not certified under ISO 27001, indicating the absence of a formally recognized information security management framework.

Which industry does Humanitarian Policy Group operate in ?

Humanitarian Policy Group operates primarily in the Think Tanks industry.

How many employees does Humanitarian Policy Group have ?

Humanitarian Policy Group employs approximately None employees people worldwide.

Does Humanitarian Policy Group own any subsidiaries ?

Humanitarian Policy Group presently has no subsidiaries across any sectors.

How many LinkedIn followers does Humanitarian Policy Group have ?

Humanitarian Policy Group's official LinkedIn profile has approximately 17,399 followers.

What is the NAICS classification code for Humanitarian Policy Group ?

Humanitarian Policy Group is classified under the NAICS code 54172, which corresponds to Research and Development in the Social Sciences and Humanities.

Does Humanitarian Policy Group have a Crunchbase profile ?

No, Humanitarian Policy Group does not have a profile on Crunchbase.

Does Humanitarian Policy Group have a LinkedIn profile ?

Yes, Humanitarian Policy Group maintains an official LinkedIn profile, which is actively utilized for branding and talent engagement, which can be accessed here: https://www.linkedin.com/company/humanitarian-policy-group.

How many cybersecurity incidents has Humanitarian Policy Group experienced ?

As of September 9, 2026, Rankiteo reports that Humanitarian Policy Group has not experienced any cybersecurity incidents.

How many peer or competitor companies does Humanitarian Policy Group have ?

Humanitarian Policy Group has an estimated 1,010 peer or competitor companies worldwide.

Badge your company to reduce your risk score and your cyber insurance costs!

Link verified badges to your company page to build trust with insurers and customers.

Apply now and get your badge!

Internal validation & live display

Insurers and partners see a safer profile

Faster underwriting decisions

Trusted by insurers. Chosen by leaders.

Proud contributor to the Society of Actuaries.

HPG

Boost Score +25 with badge (5 left)

756

/1000

Fair

781

/1000

Fair

Humanitarian Policy Group Vendor Cyber Rating & Cyber Score

odi.org

Add Your Compliance Badge

The Humanitarian Policy Group (HPG) is one of the world's leading teams working on humanitarian issues. We are dedicated to improving humanitarian policy and practice through a combination of high-quality analysis, dialogue and debate. HPG is part of ODI Global, a leading global affairs think tank.

HPG

Humanitarian Policy Group CyberSecurity News & History

Past Incidents

Attack Types

Entity

Type

Severity

Impact

Seen

Blog Details

Supply Chain Source

Incident Details

View

No data available

Loading…

A.I.

HPG Company Scoring based on AI Models

Cyber Incidents Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

Actual

Prediction

Incident Predictions locked

Access Monitoring Plan

A.I Risk Score Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

Actual

Prediction A

Prediction B

Prediction C

Prediction D

A.I. Risk Score Predictions locked

Access Monitoring Plan

Loading…

Underwriter Stats for HPG

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Humanitarian Policy Group in 2026.

Incidents vs All-Companies Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Humanitarian Policy Group in 2026.

Incident Types HPG vs Think Tanks Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Humanitarian Policy Group in 2026.

Incident History - HPG (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Loading…

SUBSIDIARY

Humanitarian Policy Group Subsidiaries

HPG

Think Tanks

Website: https://odi.org/en/about/our-work/humanitarian-policy-group/

Company Size: 11-50 employees

ODI GlobalThink Tanks

ODI Trade and Economic DevelopmentThink Tanks

Tandem LeadershipNon-profit Organizations

ODI Global Risks and ResilienceThink Tanks

ODI EuropeThink Tanks

Loading…

Humanitarian Policy Group Similar Companies

Loading…

NEWS

Humanitarian Policy Group CyberSecurity News

Latest updates, reports, and threat intel affecting the global network.

January 20, 2026 08:00 AM

Security Legislation Amendment (Critical Infrastructure Protection) Act 2022

The reforms in the SLACIP Act seek to make risk management, preparedness, prevention and resilience, business as usual for the owners and operators of critical...

Read Article

January 15, 2026 08:00 AM

IHL’s lighthouse: navigating towards a digital emblem

January 15, 2026 , Cyber / Cybersecurity and data protection in humanitarian action / IHL / Law and Conflict / New Technologies / Special...

Read Article

December 11, 2025 08:00 AM

Securing the Final Frontier: Cybersecurity Risk, Regulation, and Compliance Trends in Space and Satellite Operations

Space and satellite systems underpin a wide range of critical functions, including global communications, navigation, scientific research,...

Read Article

November 11, 2025 08:00 AM

Enhancing the Quad’s cybersecurity cooperation to counter Chinese cyberattacks

Written by Kristina Lozinskaya. More can and should be done to deter, protect from, and respond to Chinese cyberattacks.

Read Article

October 30, 2025 07:00 AM

ICRC engagement with armed groups in 2025

ICRC Adviser Matthew Bamber-Zryd discusses key insights from the 2025 survey regarding the ICRC's engagement with armed groups.

Read Article

October 27, 2025 07:00 AM

ICRC and Luxembourg House of Cybersecurity strengthen cooperation on cybersecurity and digital resilience for humanitarian action

At the occasion of the Cybersecurity Month and the Autumn Edition of the Cybersecurity Week Luxembourg Campaign, the International Committee...

Read Article

October 14, 2025 07:00 AM

GCF 2025: Humanitarian Voice at the Heart of Cybersecurity

Riyadh, Saudi Arabia — As cyber threats increasingly endanger civilian lives, the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) joined...

Read Article

September 22, 2025 07:00 AM

44 Top Cybersecurity Companies to Know 2026

These companies block online threats, assess industry vulnerabilities and increase education and awareness about cybersecurity.

Read Article

August 14, 2025 07:00 AM

How AI learns, and what it misses: why data selection matters in humanitarian action

ICRC Associate Maria Haas explores how misaligned AI training data can embed blind spots and bias into the systems which humanitarian...

Read Article

Loading…

CVE

Latest

Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

CVE-2026-86564

SUMMARY

A flaw was found in DPDK lib/vhost. Missing length validation before reading command_data in the virtio-net control-queue handler can cause an out-of-bounds read and a host process crash.

Published

Date2026-09-08

Updated

Date2026-09-08

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.3)

cvss3

Base Score: 3.3

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L

Impact Score

1.4

Exploitability

1.8

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-55250

SUMMARY

Maravel, a PHP framework oriented towards dependency injection, prior to version 10.74.0 has a high-severity Token Replay Vulnerability arising from a structural lifecycle mismatch between stateless token validation engines and high-performance relational caching layers. Any application with low cache memory that causes premature eviction to free up memory and applications running macropay-solutions/maravel-framework that utilize tymon/jwt-auth for API token authentication and blacklist management or any other package that does the same may be affected. This architectural risk might also impact native Laravel applications utilizing cache tags under specific volatile or eviction-capped environments. tymon/jwt-auth automatically probes for cache tag support. If found, it forcefully wraps 14-day token blacklist entries (jti) inside a relational tymon.jwt tag. In environments where the O(1) Atomic Lazy Eviction model is active — either natively inside Maravel-Framework v20.x or manually backported into v10.x via the explicit DI container singletons provided in PR #104 (App\Cache\TaggedCache and App\Cache\TagSet) — a strict global tracking ceiling (Container::TAGGED_CACHE_TTL_CAP_SECONDS) of 7,200 seconds (2 hours) is enforced to secure the system against memory index bloat. This ceiling forcefully truncates the 14-day blacklist lifespan down to a maximum of 2 hours, after which individual tracking keys naturally expire and disappear from the active cache window. Furthermore, because the optimized engine implements a generational version matrix to achieve O(1) flush speeds, any programmatic or manual invocation of a tag flush or reset (e.g., Cache::tags([...])->flush()) instantly bumps the internal atomic master version pointer. This shifts the computed cryptographic composite hash (sha1($this->tags->getNamespace())) for all overlapping components, rendering the entire existing index immediately unreachable. Consequently, through either natural 2-hour expiration or an intervening tag flush execution (like the cache naturally cleaning old values to free up memory), the invalidation state records are entirely wiped out. Because the tokens' physical cryptographic signatures remain structurally valid for up to 14 days, stolen, hijacked, or legitimately logged-out tokens are instantly and silently resurrected across the entire API gateway, leaving the application critically vulnerable to widespread Token Replay Attacks. Because this issue is caused by an upstream architectural assumption within the tymon/jwt-auth package rather than a core defect inside the framework, there is no direct framework version upgrade that can safely bypass this lifecycle collision without breaking business cache recycling bounds. Maravel version 10.74.0 introduced a way to backport the new fixed tagged cache from 20.x into 10.x by resolving TagSet and TaggedCache from DI, which is how this latent architectural lifecycle vulnerability was discovered. Users must apply the decoupled configuration workaround outlined below. As a workaround, make sure that cache memory size does not generate early natural evictions from cache to free up space, deleting blacklisted jwt ids before they expire. Applications must decouple flat authentication vectors from the relational tagging subsystem. This forces token identifiers to write directly to the primary cache keyspace as flat, un-tagged key-value pairs where they securely retain their unclipped 14-day lifecycle.

Published

Date2026-09-08

Updated

Date2026-09-08

RISK INFORMATION (Score: )

cvss4

Base Score: 8.7

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Impact Score

Exploitability

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-53639

SUMMARY

Sylius is an Open Source eCommerce Framework on Symfony. Starting in version 2.0.0 and prior to version 2.0.18, 2.1.15, and 2.2.6, the `GET /api/v2/shop/payment-requests/{hash}` and `PUT /api/v2/shop/payment-requests/{hash}` endpoints look up the payment request solely by the hash from the URL. No ownership check is performed against the authenticated customer or the underlying order. An attacker who obtains a payment request hash can read the payment request and, through the `payment` IRI in the response, recover the underlying order's `tokenValue` (which itself grants access to the full order, items, addresses, customer email, totals); and/or update the payment request payload (e.g. `target_path`, `after_path`). These fields are used by the front-end controller to redirect the user after the payment, so an attacker can flip them to an attacker-controlled URL and intercept the buyer. The hash is a UUID, so it has to be obtained out-of-band (logs, shared links, referrer headers, a co-located client), but once it is known no other credential is required, neither authentication nor knowledge of the order token. The creation endpoint `POST /api/v2/shop/orders/{tokenValue}/payment-requests` shares the same flaw: it resolves the target order solely from the `tokenValue` in the URL without verifying that the caller owns the order. The issue is fixed in versions 2.0.18, 2.1.15, and 2.2.6. As a workaround, add a query extension that filters the `GET` operation; decorate the `PUT` state provider, guard the `POST` creation endpoint with a command-bus middleware, and wire the services.

Published

Date2026-09-08

Updated

Date2026-09-08

RISK INFORMATION (Score: )

cvss4

Base Score: 6.3

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Impact Score

Exploitability

REFERENCES

https://github.com/Sylius/Sylius/security/advisories/GHSA-mr9r-h354-966r

CVE-2026-53638

SUMMARY

Sylius is an Open Source eCommerce Framework on Symfony. Starting in version 2.0.0 and prior to version 2.0.18, 2.1.15, and 2.2.6, an authorization bypass vulnerability exists in the shop account API. The `PATCH /api/v2/shop/account/orders/{tokenValue}/payments/{paymentId}` endpoint, used by an authenticated shop customer to change the payment method of an order that has been placed but not yet paid (state `STATE_NEW`), does not validate that the chosen payment method is enabled for the order's channel. The equivalent checkout endpoint (`PATCH /api/v2/shop/orders/{tokenValue}/payments/{paymentId}`) correctly rejects out-of-channel payment methods with `HTTP 422`; the account endpoint silently accepts them and returns `HTTP 200`. An authenticated customer can therefore assign any globally enabled payment method to their own placed order, including methods that the store operator has explicitly excluded from that channel. The issue is fixed in versions: 2.0.18, 2.1.15, 2.2.6 and above. As a workaround, decorate the `Sylius\Bundle\ApiBundle\Changer\PaymentMethodChangerInterface` service in the application.

Published

Date2026-09-08

Updated

Date2026-09-08

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)

cvss3

Base Score: 4.3

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N

Impact Score

1.4

Exploitability

2.8

REFERENCES

https://github.com/Sylius/Sylius/security/advisories/GHSA-6955-hrm5-c4qp

CVE-2026-53637

SUMMARY

Sylius is an Open Source eCommerce Framework on Symfony. Versions 2.0.0 through 2.0.17, 2.1.0 through 2.1.14, and 2.2.0 through 2.2.5 contain an improper workflow enforcement vulnerability in the cart `FormComponent`. When an order is completed while its cart page remains open, the stale LiveComponent does not detect the order’s changed state and continues to permit cart actions, allowing an authenticated customer to modify or permanently delete an already completed order. Versions 2.0.18, 2.1.15, and 2.2.6 contain a patch. As a workaround, deployments can copy the patched `FormComponent` into the application's `src/` directory and override the `sylius_shop.twig.component.cart.form` service definition to use that class.

Published

Date2026-09-08

Updated

Date2026-09-08

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)

cvss3

Base Score: 6.5

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N

Impact Score

3.6

Exploitability

2.8

REFERENCES

https://github.com/Sylius/Sylius/security/advisories/GHSA-5597-7rmh-97q5

Loading…

API

Access Data Using Our API

Get company history

curl -i -X GET 'https://api.rankiteo.com/underwriter-getcompany-history?
linkedin_id=axa' -H 'apikey: YOUR_API_KEY_HERE'

Try It API Documentation Rapid

MEASURE

What Do We Measure ?

Incident

Finding

Grade

Digital Assets

Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.

These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:

Network SecurityIdentify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.

SBOM (Software Bill of Materials)Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.

CMDB (Configuration Management Database)Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.

Threat IntelligenceLeverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.

Rankiteo

By Rankiteo

★ ★ ★ ★ ★

View on G2.com

Rankiteo is a unified scoring and risk platform that analyzes billions of signals weekly to help organizations gain faster, more actionable insights into emerging threats. Empowering teams to outpace adversaries and reduce exposure.

View latest plans →View all security reports →

MILESTONEG

Users
Love Us

Loading…

Badge your company to reduce your risk score and your cyber insurance costs!

Trusted by insurers. Chosen by leaders.

Humanitarian Policy Group Vendor Cyber Rating & Cyber Score

HPG A.I CyberSecurity Scoring

Humanitarian Policy Group CyberSecurity News & History

HPG Company Scoring based on AI Models

Cyber Incidents Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

Incident Predictions locked

A.I Risk Score Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

A.I. Risk Score Predictions locked

Underwriter Stats for HPG

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Avg (This Year)

Incidents vs All-Companies Average (This Year)

Incident Types HPG vs Think Tanks Industry Avg (This Year)

Incident History - HPG (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Humanitarian Policy Group Subsidiaries

HPG

Humanitarian Policy Group Similar Companies

Humanitarian Policy Group CyberSecurity News

Security Legislation Amendment (Critical Infrastructure Protection) Act 2022

IHL’s lighthouse: navigating towards a digital emblem

Securing the Final Frontier: Cybersecurity Risk, Regulation, and Compliance Trends in Space and Satellite Operations

Enhancing the Quad’s cybersecurity cooperation to counter Chinese cyberattacks

ICRC engagement with armed groups in 2025

ICRC and Luxembourg House of Cybersecurity strengthen cooperation on cybersecurity and digital resilience for humanitarian action

GCF 2025: Humanitarian Voice at the Heart of Cybersecurity

44 Top Cybersecurity Companies to Know 2026

How AI learns, and what it misses: why data selection matters in humanitarian action

Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Access Data Using Our API

What Do We Measure ?

These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:

Rankiteo

Humanitarian Policy Group CyberSecurity News & History

HPG Company Scoring based on AI Models

Cyber Incidents Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

Incident Predictions locked

A.I Risk Score Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

A.I. Risk Score Predictions locked

Underwriter Stats for HPG

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Avg (This Year)

Incidents vs All-Companies Average (This Year)

Incident Types HPG vs Think Tanks Industry Avg (This Year)

Incident History - HPG (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Humanitarian Policy Group Subsidiaries

HPG

Humanitarian Policy Group Similar Companies

Humanitarian Policy Group CyberSecurity News

Security Legislation Amendment (Critical Infrastructure Protection) Act 2022

IHL’s lighthouse: navigating towards a digital emblem

Securing the Final Frontier: Cybersecurity Risk, Regulation, and Compliance Trends in Space and Satellite Operations

Enhancing the Quad’s cybersecurity cooperation to counter Chinese cyberattacks

ICRC engagement with armed groups in 2025

ICRC and Luxembourg House of Cybersecurity strengthen cooperation on cybersecurity and digital resilience for humanitarian action

GCF 2025: Humanitarian Voice at the Heart of Cybersecurity

44 Top Cybersecurity Companies to Know 2026

How AI learns, and what it misses: why data selection matters in humanitarian action

Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Access Data Using Our API

What Do We Measure ?

These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:

Rankiteo