What is the official website of Human Error Prevention ?

The official website of Human Error Prevention is http://www.islss.com/.

What is Human Error Prevention's cybersecurity risk score?

Human Error Prevention has an AI-generated cybersecurity risk score of 755 out of 1000, indicating a Fair security posture according to Rankiteo's assessment.

How many security incidents has Human Error Prevention experienced?

According to Rankiteo, Human Error Prevention currently holds 0 security badges, indicating that no recognized compliance certifications are currently verified for the organization.

Has Human Error Prevention been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents ?

According to Rankiteo, Human Error Prevention has not been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents, and no incident IDs are currently listed for the organization.

Does Human Error Prevention have SOC 2 Type 1 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, Human Error Prevention is not certified under SOC 2 Type 1.

Does Human Error Prevention have SOC 2 Type 2 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, Human Error Prevention does not hold a SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Does Human Error Prevention comply with GDPR ?

According to Rankiteo, Human Error Prevention is not listed as GDPR compliant.

Does Human Error Prevention have PCI DSS certification ?

According to Rankiteo, Human Error Prevention does not currently maintain PCI DSS compliance.

Does Human Error Prevention comply with HIPAA ?

According to Rankiteo, Human Error Prevention is not compliant with HIPAA regulations.

Does Human Error Prevention have ISO 27001 certification ?

According to Rankiteo,Human Error Prevention is not certified under ISO 27001, indicating the absence of a formally recognized information security management framework.

Which industry does Human Error Prevention operate in ?

Human Error Prevention operates primarily in the Human Resources industry.

How many employees does Human Error Prevention have ?

Human Error Prevention employs approximately None employees people worldwide.

Does Human Error Prevention own any subsidiaries ?

Human Error Prevention presently has no subsidiaries across any sectors.

How many LinkedIn followers does Human Error Prevention have ?

Human Error Prevention's official LinkedIn profile has approximately 170 followers.

Does Human Error Prevention have a Crunchbase profile ?

No, Human Error Prevention does not have a profile on Crunchbase.

Does Human Error Prevention have a LinkedIn profile ?

Yes, Human Error Prevention maintains an official LinkedIn profile, which is actively utilized for branding and talent engagement, which can be accessed here: https://www.linkedin.com/company/human-error-prevention.

How many cybersecurity incidents has Human Error Prevention experienced ?

As of July 12, 2026, Rankiteo reports that Human Error Prevention has experienced 1 cybersecurity incidents.

How many peer or competitor companies does Human Error Prevention have ?

Human Error Prevention has an estimated 1,203 peer or competitor companies worldwide.

What types of cybersecurity incidents has Human Error Prevention faced ?

Incident Types: The types of cybersecurity incidents that have occurred include Ransomware.

NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop

WindowsmacOSLinux

Download

Badge your company to reduce your risk score and your cyber insurance costs!

Link verified badges to your company page to build trust with insurers and customers.

Apply now and get your badge!

Internal validation & live display

Insurers and partners see a safer profile

Faster underwriting decisions

Trusted by insurers. Chosen by leaders.

Proud contributor to the Society of Actuaries.

HEP

Boost Score +25 with badge (5 left)

755

/1000

Fair

780

/1000

Fair

Human Error Prevention Vendor Cyber Rating & Cyber Score

islss.com

Add Your Compliance Badge

Losses are attributable to human error, not only error in the implementation of processes but also error in the design of the processes, including the design of the hardware used in the processes

HEP A.I CyberSecurity Scoring

Scoring History

HEP

Human Error Prevention CyberSecurity News & History

Past Incidents

Attack Types

Entity

Type

Severity

Impact

Seen

Blog Details

Supply Chain Source

Incident Details

View

International Organ...

Ransomware

100

6/2026

INT1781972623

Loading…

A.I.

HEP Company Scoring based on AI Models

Cyber Incidents Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

Actual

Prediction

Incident Predictions locked

Access Monitoring Plan

A.I Risk Score Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

Actual

Prediction A

Prediction B

Prediction C

Prediction D

A.I. Risk Score Predictions locked

Access Monitoring Plan

Loading…

Underwriter Stats for HEP

Incidents vs Human Resources Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Human Error Prevention in 2026.

Incidents vs All-Companies Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Human Error Prevention in 2026.

Incident Types HEP vs Human Resources Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Human Error Prevention in 2026.

Incident History - HEP (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Loading…

SUBSIDIARY

Human Error Prevention Subsidiaries

HEP

Human Resources

Website: http://www.islss.com/

Company Size: 11-50 employees

AuditorsE-learning

SeminarsEvents Services

High Technology Seminars (HTS)Education Administration Programs

Process Improvement ConsultantsBusiness Consulting and Services

Lean Six Sigma CertificationExecutive Offices

Mistake-ProofingInformation Technology & Services

Kaizen Event TrainingHigher Education

Loading…

Human Error Prevention Similar Companies

Loading…

NEWS

Human Error Prevention CyberSecurity News

Latest updates, reports, and threat intel affecting the global network.

December 23, 2025 08:00 AM

Cybersecurity in the UK

This briefing provides an overview of cybersecurity in the UK. It explains the nature of the cyber threat, including how cyber attacks work.

Read Article

December 07, 2025 08:00 AM

Clear for takeoff: Building cyber resilience in commercial aviation

In commercial aviation, the goal is to enhance resilience by factoring in human error and malicious ingenuity to stop advanced attacks.

Read Article

December 01, 2025 08:00 AM

Airport Cyber Attacks ☑️ What You Must Know - Panda Security

Airport Cyber Attacks exposed vulnerabilities ⚠️ Learn how airports fight threats and secure operations today.

Read Article

November 23, 2025 08:00 AM

Rising cost of trust as insider behavior becomes a weak link in critical infrastructure cyber defense

Malicious and negligent insider activity continues to drive a significant portion of cyber risk within OT (operational technology)...

Read Article

November 14, 2025 08:00 AM

Human Error: The #1 Cause of Security Incidents

Human error remains the leading cause of security breaches, even in today's era of advanced technology and automated defences.

Read Article

November 04, 2025 08:00 AM

Data disasters and human error

Prevent human error with strategies that work.

Read Article

October 23, 2025 07:00 AM

Cybersecurity awareness quiz: Questions and answers

Take this security awareness training quiz to test your knowledge of common cybersecurity threats and best practices, from secure file...

Read Article

October 16, 2025 07:00 AM

Securing the digital future: Cyber resilience and trust in the AI age

Global challenges have become inseparable, making collaboration across disciplines more important than ever. In Dubai, Global Future...

Read Article

September 30, 2025 07:00 AM

The Role of AI in Modern Information Security Practices

Posted on September 30, 2025 on Graduate School, Seahawk Nation · Facebook Twitter Pinterest Email Share. Modern cybersecurity practices recognize that...

Read Article

Loading…

CVE

Latest

Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

CVE-2026-58281

SUMMARY

Deserialization of untrusted data in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.

Published

Date2026-07-11

Updated

Date2026-07-11

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.3)

cvss3

Base Score: 8.3

Complexity: HIGH

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

Impact Score

Exploitability

1.6

REFERENCES

https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58281

CVE-2026-10660

SUMMARY

The Bluetooth BAP Broadcast Assistant GATT client in subsys/bluetooth/audio/bap_broadcast_assistant.c reassembled remote Broadcast Receive State data into a single file-static net_buf_simple (att_buf, BT_ATT_MAX_ATTRIBUTE_LEN = 512 bytes) shared by all connection instances, while the BUSY flag, long-read handle, and reset/offset state were per-connection. When the device acts as a Broadcast Assistant connected to multiple Scan Delegator peripherals, notification and long-read callbacks from different connections interleave on the shared buffer: the append in notify_handler (net_buf_simple_add_mem at the not-busy branch) performs no tailroom check, so receive-state notifications from two or more delegators accumulate on the same 512-byte buffer and, with a sufficiently large configured ATT MTU (BT_L2CAP_TX_MTU up to 2000) and two-to-three concurrent connections, write past the buffer into adjacent .bss (net_buf_simple_add only asserts in debug builds). Even below the overflow threshold, one connection's net_buf_simple_reset zeroes the shared length while another connection's reassembly and GATT read offset are in flight, mixing one peer's data into another's parse. A malicious or compromised Scan Delegator (or two colluding peers) over BLE can trigger this, causing out-of-bounds writes (memory corruption / denial of service) and cross-connection data corruption. The fix moves the buffer into the per-connection instance struct so each connection reassembles into its own buffer. Affects Zephyr releases shipping the Broadcast Assistant with the shared buffer, including v4.4.0 and earlier.

Published

Date2026-07-11

Updated

Date2026-07-11

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.4)

cvss3

Base Score: 6.4

Complexity: HIGH

CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:H

Impact Score

4.7

Exploitability

1.6

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-61870

SUMMARY

ImageMagick before 7.1.2-26 contains a memory leak vulnerability in the VIFF encoder when memory allocation fails. Attackers can trigger allocation failures by processing specially crafted VIFF images to exhaust available memory and cause denial of service.

Published

Date2026-07-11

Updated

Date2026-07-11

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 2.9)

cvss3

Base Score: 2.9

Complexity: HIGH

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L

cvss4

Base Score: 2.1

Complexity: HIGH

CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Impact Score

1.4

Exploitability

1.4

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-61861

SUMMARY

ImageMagick before 7.1.2-26 contains a use-after-free vulnerability in the FormatMagickCaption method when memory allocation fails. Attackers can trigger memory allocation failures to cause a dangling pointer to reference freed memory, potentially enabling denial of service or code execution.

Published

Date2026-07-11

Updated

Date2026-07-11

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.7)

cvss3

Base Score: 3.7

Complexity: HIGH

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L

cvss4

Base Score: 6.3

Complexity: HIGH

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Impact Score

1.4

Exploitability

2.2

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-61858

SUMMARY

ImageMagick before 7.1.2-26 contains a policy bypass vulnerability in the APNG encoder and external delegates due to missing validation checks. Attackers can write files to disallowed paths by bypassing configured policy restrictions through the APNG encoding process.

Published

Date2026-07-11

Updated

Date2026-07-11

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.3)

cvss3

Base Score: 3.3

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N

cvss4

Base Score: 4.8

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Impact Score

1.4

Exploitability

1.8

REFERENCES

Loading…

API

Access Data Using Our API

Get company history

curl -i -X GET 'https://api.rankiteo.com/underwriter-getcompany-history?
linkedin_id=axa' -H 'apikey: YOUR_API_KEY_HERE'

Try It API Documentation Rapid

MEASURE

What Do We Measure ?

Incident

Finding

Grade

Digital Assets

Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.

These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:

Network SecurityIdentify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.

SBOM (Software Bill of Materials)Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.

CMDB (Configuration Management Database)Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.

Threat IntelligenceLeverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.

Rankiteo

By Rankiteo

★ ★ ★ ★ ★

View on G2.com

Rankiteo is a unified scoring and risk platform that analyzes billions of signals weekly to help organizations gain faster, more actionable insights into emerging threats. Empowering teams to outpace adversaries and reduce exposure.

View latest plans →View all security reports →

MILESTONEG

Users
Love Us

Loading…