Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Hospitalsenhed MidtHospitalsenhed Midt
VS
DaVita Kidney CareDaVita Kidney Care
Hospitalsenhed Midt

Hospitalsenhed Midt

Heibergs Alle 4, Viborg, Region Midtjylland, 8800, DK

Last Update: 21/04/2026

View Profile
765/1000Fair

Hospitalsenhed Midt is the second largest of five hospital units in Central Denmark Region. The four hospitals within Hospitalsenhed Midt employ approximately 4,300 employees, treat more than 372,000 outpatients and discharge more than 45,000 patients after hospitalizat...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:901
Subsidiaries:38
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
DaVita Kidney Care

DaVita Kidney Care

2000 16th Street, Denver, 80202, US

Last Update: 24/04/2026

View Profile
Between 0 and 549
https://www.davita.com
100/1000Critical

DaVita means “to give life,” reflecting our proud history as leaders in dialysis—an essential, life-sustaining treatment for those living with end stage kidney disease (ESKD). Today, our mission is to minimize the devastating impacts of kidney disease across the full sp...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:40,009
Subsidiaries:8
12-month incidents
2
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
3

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Hospitalsenhed Midt

Hospitalsenhed Midt

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
DaVita Kidney Care

DaVita Kidney Care

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Hospitalsenhed Midt in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

DaVita Kidney Care has 92.31% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Hospitalsenhed Midt (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Hospitalsenhed Midt cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - DaVita Kidney Care (X = Date, Y = Severity)

DaVita Kidney Care cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Hospitalsenhed Midt

Hospitalsenhed Midt

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
DaVita Kidney Care

DaVita Kidney Care

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
TEXDAV1773347117
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
CONDAVORASANASA1770645741
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
KET5232452102025

FAQ

Between Hospitalsenhed Midt company and DaVita Kidney Care company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Hospitalsenhed Midt company and DaVita Kidney Care company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Hospitalsenhed Midt company and DaVita Kidney Care company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Hospitalsenhed Midt company and DaVita Kidney Care company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Hospitalsenhed Midt company and DaVita Kidney Care company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Hospitalsenhed Midt company and DaVita Kidney Care company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Hospitalsenhed Midt company and DaVita Kidney Care company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Hospitalsenhed Midt company and DaVita Kidney Care company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Hospitalsenhed Midt company and DaVita Kidney Care company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Hospitalsenhed Midt company and DaVita Kidney Care company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Hospitalsenhed Midt company and DaVita Kidney Care company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Hospitalsenhed Midt and DaVita Kidney Care, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Hospitalsenhed Midt and DaVita Kidney Care, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Hospitalsenhed Midt or DaVita Kidney Care ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Hospitalsenhed Midt or DaVita Kidney Care ?
Between Hospitalsenhed Midt and DaVita Kidney Care, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Hospitalsenhed Midt and DaVita Kidney Care, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-63261
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption (CWE-400) in Kibana can lead to denial of service via Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130). A low-privileged authenticated user can send a specially crafted request to a Kibana machine learning feature, causing the server to exhaust available memory and become unavailable to all users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63260
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption (CWE-400) in Kibana can lead to denial of service via Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130). An authenticated attacker with low-privilege access can trigger a denial of service condition in Kibana by sending a specially crafted, oversized request payload. Processing this user-supplied input requires resource-intensive memory allocation that can exhaust the available heap memory in the Kibana process, causing it to crash and become unavailable to all users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63259
SUMMARY

Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key (CWE-639) in Kibana can lead to information disclosure via user-supplied identifiers that reference scheduled query result data from Kibana Spaces the requester is not authorized to access.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63145
SUMMARY

Incorrect Authorization (CWE-863) in Kibana can lead to integrity compromise of Machine Learning audit and notification records via Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs (CAPEC-1). A vulnerability exists in Kibana's Machine Learning functionality where a Machine Learning management endpoint performs an insufficient authorization check. The endpoint validates only a coarse privilege level but does not verify that the requesting user has access to the specific Machine Learning job or notification resources provided in the request. As a result, a low-privileged user with Machine Learning access in any Kibana space can manipulate Machine Learning audit and notification records for arbitrary jobs—including jobs in other spaces or belonging to other users—by leveraging Kibana's internally elevated credentials to write to restricted Machine Learning system indices that the user cannot access directly.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63144
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Recursion (CWE-674) in Elasticsearch can lead to denial of service via a specially crafted search request submitted by a low-privileged authenticated user. A user with read-level index access can submit a request that triggers unbounded recursive processing within the Elasticsearch query evaluation component, causing a fatal error that terminates the affected node. In single-node deployments, this results in complete service outage; in multi-node clusters, it causes repeated node restarts and sustained availability degradation.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8