Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Hospital Sisters Health SystemHospital Sisters Health System
VS
DaVita Kidney CareDaVita Kidney Care
Hospital Sisters Health System

Hospital Sisters Health System

4936 LaVerna Road, Springfield, 62707, US

Last Update: 03/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.hshs.org/
753/1000Fair

Since 1875, the Hospital Sisters of St. Francis have been caring for patients in Illinois, Wisconsin and other locations in the United States and across the world. Today, Hospital Sisters Health System (HSHS) is a multi-institutional health care system that cares for pa...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:11,604
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
DaVita Kidney Care

DaVita Kidney Care

2000 16th Street, Denver, 80202, US

Last Update: 24/04/2026

View Profile
Between 0 and 549
https://www.davita.com
100/1000Critical

DaVita means “to give life,” reflecting our proud history as leaders in dialysis—an essential, life-sustaining treatment for those living with end stage kidney disease (ESKD). Today, our mission is to minimize the devastating impacts of kidney disease across the full sp...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:40,009
Subsidiaries:8
12-month incidents
2
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
3

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Hospital Sisters Health System

Hospital Sisters Health System

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
DaVita Kidney Care

DaVita Kidney Care

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Hospital Sisters Health System in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

DaVita Kidney Care has 92.31% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Hospital Sisters Health System (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Hospital Sisters Health System cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - DaVita Kidney Care (X = Date, Y = Severity)

DaVita Kidney Care cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Hospital Sisters Health System

Hospital Sisters Health System

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
HOS3502435100325
DaVita Kidney Care

DaVita Kidney Care

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
TEXDAV1773347117
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
CONDAVORASANASA1770645741
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
KET5232452102025

FAQ

Between Hospital Sisters Health System company and DaVita Kidney Care company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Hospital Sisters Health System company and DaVita Kidney Care company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Hospital Sisters Health System company and DaVita Kidney Care company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Hospital Sisters Health System company and DaVita Kidney Care company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Hospital Sisters Health System company and DaVita Kidney Care company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Hospital Sisters Health System company and DaVita Kidney Care company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Hospital Sisters Health System company and DaVita Kidney Care company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Hospital Sisters Health System company and DaVita Kidney Care company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Hospital Sisters Health System company and DaVita Kidney Care company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Hospital Sisters Health System company and DaVita Kidney Care company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Hospital Sisters Health System company and DaVita Kidney Care company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Hospital Sisters Health System and DaVita Kidney Care, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Hospital Sisters Health System and DaVita Kidney Care, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Hospital Sisters Health System or DaVita Kidney Care ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Hospital Sisters Health System or DaVita Kidney Care ?
Between Hospital Sisters Health System and DaVita Kidney Care, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Hospital Sisters Health System and DaVita Kidney Care, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1