Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Hiscox Ireland » HIS1774131831

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (HIS1774131831)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-23
Company Score Before Incident734 / 1000
Company Score After Incident711 / 1000
Company LinkView Hiscox Ireland Profile
INCIDENT NUMBERHIS1774131831
Type of Cyber IncidentCyber Attack
ATTACK VECTORNA
DATA EXPOSED29% of ransomware victims suffered...
INCIDENT DATE06/11/2025
STATUSpublished

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Hiscox Ireland's Cyber Attack and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Hiscox Ireland Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Hiscox Ireland breach identified under incident ID HIS1774131831.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Hiscox Ireland's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/hiscox-ireland, the number of followers: 1642, the industry type: Insurance and the number of employees: 23 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 734 and after the incident was 711 with a difference of -23 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Hiscox Ireland and their customers.

A newly reported cybersecurity incident, "Irish Businesses Face Rising Cyber Threats and Hidden Human Costs", has drawn attention.

The Hiscox Cyber Readiness Report 2025 reveals that 40% of Irish businesses suffered at least one cyber attack in the past year, with far-reaching consequences beyond financial and reputational damage.

The disruption is felt across the environment, and exposing 29% of ransomware victims suffered data leaks, plus an estimated financial loss of 31% of affected companies reported material financial losses.

In response, while recovery efforts such as 35% of ransomware victims had to rebuild systems continue.

The case underscores how teams are taking away lessons such as AI presents a dual challenge as both a vulnerability and an asset. Cyber resilience has improved for 56% of businesses, but significant investments are planned by 2026. The human cost of cyber attacks, including stress, burnout, and workplace toxicity, is a critical concern, and recommending next steps like Boost cybersecurity investments, leverage AI as an asset, and address employee well-being post-incident.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating third-party AI tools identified as a major vulnerability and Endpoint Denial of Service (T1499) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating 36% of firms experienced DDoS attacks disrupting operations. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Encrypted for Impact (T1486) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating 70% of ransomware victims paid ransoms, 35% rebuilt systems and Defacement (T1491) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating 28% struggled to attract new customers (reputational impact). Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating 29% of ransomware victims suffered data leaks. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Adversary-in-the-Middle (T1557) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating third-party AI tools viewed as a major vulnerability (62% of firms). Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Virtualization/Sandbox Evasion (T1497) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating aI-driven threats as a root cause of attacks. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Exploit Public-Facing Application (50%)
Endpoint Denial of Service (80%)
Impact
Data Encrypted for Impact (70%)
Defacement (40%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (70%)
Credential Access
Adversary-in-the-Middle (50%)
Defense Evasion
Virtualization/Sandbox Evasion (60%)

Sources & References