Comparison Overview

Hewlett Packard Enterprise

VS

Tech Mahindra

Hewlett Packard Enterprise

1701 E Mossy Oaks Rd Spring, Houston, Texas, US, 77389
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 700 and 749

Official LinkedIn of Hewlett Packard Enterprise, the global edge-to-cloud company. Sharing our passion and purpose through technology and innovation.

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 83,542
Subsidiaries: 24
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
4
Attack type number
2

Tech Mahindra

Erandwane, Pune, Maharashtra, IN, 411004
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

Tech Mahindra offers technology consulting and digital solutions to global enterprises across industries, enabling transformative scale at unparalleled speed. With 150,000+ professionals across 90+ countries helping 1100+ clients, TechM provides a full spectrum of services including consulting, information technology, enterprise applications, business process services, engineering services, network services, customer experience & design services, AI & analytics, and cloud & infrastructure services. It is the first Indian company in the world to have been awarded the Sustainable Markets Initiative’s Terra Carta Seal, in recognition of actively leading the charge to create a climate and nature-positive future. Tech Mahindra (NSE: TECHM) is part of the Mahindra Group, founded in 1945, one of the largest and most admired multinational federations of companies. Visit www.techmahindra.com to #ScaleAtSpeed

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 149,256
Subsidiaries: 14
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hewlett-packard-enterprise.jpeg
Hewlett Packard Enterprise
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tech-mahindra.jpeg
Tech Mahindra
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Hewlett Packard Enterprise
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Tech Mahindra
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

Hewlett Packard Enterprise has 85.19% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Tech Mahindra in 2025.

Incident History — Hewlett Packard Enterprise (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Hewlett Packard Enterprise cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Tech Mahindra (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Tech Mahindra cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hewlett-packard-enterprise.jpeg
Hewlett Packard Enterprise
Incidents

Date Detected: 6/2025
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Hardcoded Credentials
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 6/2024
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Unauthenticated Directory Traversal Attack
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 6/2024
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Remote Code Execution
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tech-mahindra.jpeg
Tech Mahindra
Incidents

Date Detected: 04/2017
Type:Data Leak
Attack Vector: Unauthorized changes
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Tech Mahindra company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Hewlett Packard Enterprise company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Hewlett Packard Enterprise company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to Tech Mahindra company.

In the current year, Hewlett Packard Enterprise company has reported more cyber incidents than Tech Mahindra company.

Neither Tech Mahindra company nor Hewlett Packard Enterprise company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Hewlett Packard Enterprise company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Tech Mahindra company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Tech Mahindra company nor Hewlett Packard Enterprise company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Hewlett Packard Enterprise company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while Tech Mahindra company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Hewlett Packard Enterprise nor Tech Mahindra holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Hewlett Packard Enterprise company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Tech Mahindra company.

Tech Mahindra company employs more people globally than Hewlett Packard Enterprise company, reflecting its scale as a IT Services and IT Consulting.

Neither Hewlett Packard Enterprise nor Tech Mahindra holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Hewlett Packard Enterprise nor Tech Mahindra holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Hewlett Packard Enterprise nor Tech Mahindra holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Hewlett Packard Enterprise nor Tech Mahindra holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Hewlett Packard Enterprise nor Tech Mahindra holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Hewlett Packard Enterprise nor Tech Mahindra holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

MCP Server Kubernetes is an MCP Server that can connect to a Kubernetes cluster and manage it. Prior to 2.9.8, there is a security issue exists in the exec_in_pod tool of the mcp-server-kubernetes MCP Server. The tool accepts user-provided commands in both array and string formats. When a string format is provided, it is passed directly to shell interpretation (sh -c) without input validation, allowing shell metacharacters to be interpreted. This vulnerability can be exploited through direct command injection or indirect prompt injection attacks, where AI agents may execute commands without explicit user intent. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.9.8.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

XML external entity (XXE) injection in eyoucms v1.7.1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via crafted body of a POST request.

Description

An issue was discovered in Fanvil x210 V2 2.12.20 allowing unauthenticated attackers on the local network to access administrative functions of the device (e.g. file upload, firmware update, reboot...) via a crafted authentication bypass.

Description

Cal.com is open-source scheduling software. Prior to 5.9.8, A flaw in the login credentials provider allows an attacker to bypass password verification when a TOTP code is provided, potentially gaining unauthorized access to user accounts. This issue exists due to problematic conditional logic in the authentication flow. This vulnerability is fixed in 5.9.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Rhino is an open-source implementation of JavaScript written entirely in Java. Prior to 1.8.1, 1.7.15.1, and 1.7.14.1, when an application passed an attacker controlled float poing number into the toFixed() function, it might lead to high CPU consumption and a potential Denial of Service. Small numbers go through this call stack: NativeNumber.numTo > DToA.JS_dtostr > DToA.JS_dtoa > DToA.pow5mult where pow5mult attempts to raise 5 to a ridiculous power. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.8.1, 1.7.15.1, and 1.7.14.1.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X