Comparison Overview

Hertz

VS

Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd.

Hertz

8501 Williams Road, Estero, FL, US, 33928
Last Update: 2025-11-24
Between 750 and 799

Hertz is one of the world’s largest mobility companies, and through its indirect subsidiary, The Hertz Corporation, operates the Hertz, Dollar, and Thrifty vehicle rental brands throughout North America, Europe, the Caribbean, Latin America, Africa, the Middle East, Asia, Australia, and New Zealand. Hertz pioneered the car rental industry, and the Hertz brand is one of the most recognized brands globally. For more than a century, Hertz has offered innovative, differentiated products in an effort to make every rental experience seamless and special. Customers choose Hertz for its wide selection of top-rated vehicles, for its free Hertz Gold Plus Rewards® loyalty program, and because of Hertz’s thousands of convenient locations. Hertz also operates the Firefly car rental brand and Hertz 24/7 car sharing business in international markets and additionally rents vehicles to rideshare drivers through dedicated partnerships with Uber, Lyft, and others. Hertz also sells vehicles to consumers at Hertz Car Sales locations throughout the United States.

NAICS: 5615
NAICS Definition: Travel Arrangement and Reservation Services
Employees: 19,330
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd.

7665 Corporate Center Drive, Miami, FL, US, 33126
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. (NYSE: NCLH) is a leading global cruise company which operates Norwegian Cruise Line, Oceania Cruises and Regent Seven Seas Cruises. With a combined fleet of 32 ships and approximately 66,500 berths, NCLH offers itineraries to approximately 700 destinations worldwide. NCLH expects to add 13 additional ships across its three brands through 2036, which will add approximately 41,000 berths to its fleet.

NAICS: 5615
NAICS Definition: Travel Arrangement and Reservation Services
Employees: 16,771
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hertz.jpeg
Hertz
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/norwegian-cruise-line-holdings.jpeg
Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Hertz
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Travel Arrangements Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Hertz in 2025.

Incidents vs Travel Arrangements Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. in 2025.

Incident History — Hertz (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Hertz cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hertz.jpeg
Hertz
Incidents

Date Detected: 10/2024
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/norwegian-cruise-line-holdings.jpeg
Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Hertz company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Hertz company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. company has not reported any.

In the current year, Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. company and Hertz company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. company nor Hertz company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. company nor Hertz company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. company nor Hertz company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Hertz company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Hertz nor Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Hertz company nor Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Hertz company employs more people globally than Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. company, reflecting its scale as a Travel Arrangements.

Neither Hertz nor Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Hertz nor Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Hertz nor Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Hertz nor Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Hertz nor Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Hertz nor Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H