Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Henry Schein » HENEAS1788972115

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (HENEAS1788972115)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-102
Company Score Before Incident717 / 1000
Company Score After Incident615 / 1000
INCIDENT NUMBERHENEAS1788972115
Type of Cyber IncidentRansomware
ATTACK VECTORNA
DATA EXPOSEDNA
INCIDENT DATE05/09/2026
STATUSUnverified

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Henry Schein's Ransomware and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Henry Schein Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Henry Schein breach identified under incident ID HENEAS1788972115.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Henry Schein's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/henry-schein, the number of followers: 252173, the industry type: Medical Equipment Manufacturing and the number of employees: 10734 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 717 and after the incident was 615 with a difference of -102 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Henry Schein and their customers.

On 06 September 2026, eAssist Dental Solutions disclosed Ransomware issues under the banner "eAssist Dental Solutions Alleged Ransomware Attack by DireWolf Group".

In September 2026, eAssist Dental Solutions, a Utah-based dental billing and revenue cycle management provider, was named as an alleged victim of a cyberattack by the ransomware group DireWolf.

Impact assessments are still underway, so the full scope is not yet clear.

Formal response steps have not been shared publicly yet.

The case underscores how Unverified.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating cloud-based billing, claims processing, and revenue cycle management and Trusted Relationship (T1199) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating parent company, Henry Schein (acquired 70% stake in 2021). Under the Execution tactic, the analysis identified User Execution: Malicious File (T1204.002) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating direWolf employs double-extortion tactics, encrypting files. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Unsecured Credentials: Credentials In Files (T1552.001) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating handles sensitive patient and practice data, including billing records. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating potential sensitive patient and practice data (billing and insurance records). Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating direWolf employs double-extortion tactics, threatening to leak stolen data. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Encrypted for Impact (T1486) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating direWolf employs double-extortion tactics, encrypting files. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Obfuscated Files or Information (T1027) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware group active since May 2025, employs double-extortion tactics. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Exploit Public-Facing Application (50%)
Trusted Relationship (60%)
Execution
User Execution: Malicious File (70%)
Credential Access
Unsecured Credentials: Credentials In Files (60%)
Collection
Data from Local System (80%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (90%)
Impact
Data Encrypted for Impact (90%)
Defense Evasion
Obfuscated Files or Information (60%)