Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Heart and Vascular Care » HEA1773426785

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (HEA1773426785)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-183
Company Score Before Incident756 / 1000
Company Score After Incident573 / 1000
Company LinkView Heart and Vascular Care Profile
INCIDENT NUMBERHEA1773426785
Type of Cyber IncidentBreach
ATTACK VECTORNA
DATA EXPOSEDPersonal and sensitive patient data,...
INCIDENT DATE28/02/2023
STATUSSettled

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Heart and Vascular Care's Breach and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Heart and Vascular Care Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Heart and Vascular Care breach identified under incident ID HEA1773426785.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Heart and Vascular Care's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/heart-and-vascular-care, the number of followers: 800, the industry type: Medical Practices and the number of employees: 107 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 756 and after the incident was 573 with a difference of -183 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Heart and Vascular Care and their customers.

Memorial Heart Institute LLC recently reported "Memorial Heart Institute Data Breach Settlement", a noteworthy cybersecurity incident.

A federal court preliminarily approved a $3.75 million settlement between Memorial Heart Institute LLC and plaintiffs affected by a March 2023 data breach that exposed the private information of approximately 460,000 individuals, including Social Security numbers of 287,000 pa...

The disruption is felt across the environment, and exposing Personal and sensitive patient data, including Social Security numbers, with nearly 460,000 records at risk, plus an estimated financial loss of $3.75 million (settlement).

Formal response steps have not been shared publicly yet.

The case underscores how Settled.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating cybercrime group that accessed sensitive patient data and Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating no details on breach’s origin, but healthcare systems often targeted. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Unsecured Credentials (T1552) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating sSNs and sensitive patient data compromised and OS Credential Dumping (T1003) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating cybercrime group accessed sensitive data (implied credentials). Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating personal and sensitive patient data compromised and Data from Information Repositories (T1213) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating 460,000 records exposed (likely from databases). Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating data breach impacting 460,000 individuals and Exfiltration Over Web Service (T1567) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating cybercrime group likely exfiltrated data. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Destruction (T1485) with lower confidence (30%), supported by evidence indicating no details on malware or data destruction and Defacement (T1491) with lower confidence (20%), supported by evidence indicating no evidence of defacement. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Valid Accounts (70%)
Exploit Public-Facing Application (50%)
Credential Access
Unsecured Credentials (60%)
OS Credential Dumping (50%)
Collection
Data from Local System (80%)
Data from Information Repositories (70%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (80%)
Exfiltration Over Web Service (60%)
Impact
Data Destruction (30%)
Defacement (20%)

Sources & References