Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Health New Zealand | Te Whatu OraHealth New Zealand | Te Whatu Ora
VS
OptumOptum
Health New Zealand | Te Whatu Ora

Health New Zealand | Te Whatu Ora

Wellington, NZ

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
779/1000Fair

We oversee New Zealand’s health services, from hospitals and specialists to community care like GPs. Our team is a group of highly skilled, dedicated professionals committed to delivering exceptional care. We’re driven by a mission to enhance health outcomes for everyon...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:9,164
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
Optum

Optum

11000 Optum Circle, Eden Prairie , MN, US, 55344

Last Update: 05/04/2026

View Profile
Between 650 and 699
https://www.optum.com/en/
672/1000Weak

At Optum, we take a bold approach to solving the challenges of healthcare. We call it Healthy Optumism — the realistic yet hopeful belief that when you’re grounded in real world needs, human connection and data-driven expertise, better is always possible. We use advance...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:103,600
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
3

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Health New Zealand | Te Whatu Ora

Health New Zealand | Te Whatu Ora

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Optum

Optum

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

Health New Zealand | Te Whatu Ora has 29.08% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Optum in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Health New Zealand | Te Whatu Ora (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Health New Zealand | Te Whatu Ora cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Optum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Optum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Health New Zealand | Te Whatu Ora

Health New Zealand | Te Whatu Ora

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
ALM1779575065
Optum

Optum

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
OPT001102824
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
UNI1012070724
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
UNICHA1768835481

FAQ

Between Health New Zealand | Te Whatu Ora company and Optum company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Health New Zealand | Te Whatu Ora company and Optum company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Health New Zealand | Te Whatu Ora company and Optum company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Health New Zealand | Te Whatu Ora company and Optum company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Health New Zealand | Te Whatu Ora company and Optum company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Health New Zealand | Te Whatu Ora company and Optum company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Health New Zealand | Te Whatu Ora company and Optum company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Health New Zealand | Te Whatu Ora company and Optum company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Health New Zealand | Te Whatu Ora company and Optum company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Health New Zealand | Te Whatu Ora company and Optum company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Health New Zealand | Te Whatu Ora company and Optum company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Health New Zealand | Te Whatu Ora and Optum, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Health New Zealand | Te Whatu Ora and Optum, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Health New Zealand | Te Whatu Ora or Optum ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Health New Zealand | Te Whatu Ora or Optum ?
Between Health New Zealand | Te Whatu Ora and Optum, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Health New Zealand | Te Whatu Ora and Optum, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-57980
SUMMARY

Authentication bypass using an alternate path or channel in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform tampering over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-56741
SUMMARY

JLine is a Java library for handling console input. Prior to 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1, the JLine3 Telnet server remote-telnet module does not apply an upper bound to terminal dimensions received via the Telnet NAWS option, and TelnetIO.handleNAWS() in TelnetIO.java:856-879 reads client-supplied width and height as 16-bit unsigned integers and passes values such as 65535x65535 to setTerminalGeometry(), allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to repeatedly alternate values and trigger continuous expensive rendering work that causes CPU exhaustion and denial of service. This issue is fixed in versions 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-56740
SUMMARY

JLine is a Java library for handling console input. Prior to 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1, the JLine3 Telnet server remote-telnet module does not limit the number of environment variables a client may inject via the Telnet NEW-ENVIRON option, and TelnetIO.readNEVariables() in TelnetIO.java:1127-1180 stores each variable pair in a HashMap held by ConnectionData, allowing an unauthenticated attacker to flood unique variable pairs before the terminating IAC SE byte and exhaust JVM heap memory with an OutOfMemoryError. This issue is fixed in versions 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-56171
SUMMARY

Exposure of private personal information to an unauthorized actor in Windows RDP allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-54335
SUMMARY

Feathersjs is a framework for creating web APIs and real-time applications with TypeScript or JavaScript. In 5.0.44 and earlier, the _.merge(target, source) utility exported by @feathersjs/commons recursively merges source into target by iterating Object.keys(source). When source was produced by JSON.parse and contains a __proto__, constructor, or prototype key, that key is returned as an own-enumerable property; the recursive merge then resolves target['__proto__'] to Object.prototype and writes attacker-supplied properties onto it, polluting the prototype for all plain objects in the process for the lifetime of the Node process. This issue is fixed in version 5.0.45.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.7
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2