Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Health Catalyst » HUMORAHEACEN1774290394

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (HUMORAHEACEN1774290394)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-150
Company Score Before Incident748 / 1000
Company Score After Incident598 / 1000
INCIDENT NUMBERHUMORAHEACEN1774290394
Type of Cyber IncidentRansomware
ATTACK VECTORVendor’s software vulnerability
DATA EXPOSEDSensitive personal and medical information
INCIDENT DATE31/07/2025
STATUSOngoing

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Health Catalyst's Ransomware and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Health Catalyst Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Health Catalyst breach identified under incident ID HUMORAHEACEN1774290394.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Health Catalyst's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/healthcatalyst, the number of followers: 150486, the industry type: IT Services and IT Consulting and the number of employees: 1462 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 748 and after the incident was 598 with a difference of -150 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Health Catalyst and their customers.

Humana recently reported "Humana and Centerwell Hit by Clop Ransomware Attack", a noteworthy cybersecurity incident.

Humana confirmed a data breach in August 2025, exposing sensitive personal and medical information of an undisclosed number of individuals.

The disruption is felt across the environment, and exposing Sensitive personal and medical information, with nearly Undisclosed (4,618 Texas residents confirmed) records at risk.

In response, and stakeholders are being briefed through Notifications to affected individuals.

The case underscores how Ongoing, with advisories going out to stakeholders covering 24 months of free credit monitoring and identity restoration services (enrollment deadline: March 31, 2027).

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Supply Chain Compromise (T1195) with high confidence (90%), with evidence including attack stemmed from a vendor’s software vulnerability, and oracle’s E-Business Suite flaw exploited and Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating oracle’s E-Business Suite flaw exploited by Clop. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Steal Application Access Token (T1528) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating vendor’s software vulnerability likely exposed credentials or tokens. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating names, SSNs, medical billing details, claims info compromised and Data from Information Repositories (T1213) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating health insurance data, Humana ID numbers, patient account numbers exposed. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating clop claimed responsibility; data exfiltration confirmed and Transfer Data to Cloud Account (T1537) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating clop specializes in data theft for ransom demands. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Defacement (T1491) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating clop publicly claimed responsibility for the breach and Financial Theft (T1657) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating motivation such as Financial gain (ransom demand). Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Indicator Removal (T1066) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating clop typically steals data without encryption to avoid detection and Hide Artifacts (T1564) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating no details on malware’s origin or extent of breach. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Supply Chain Compromise (90%)
Exploit Public-Facing Application (80%)
Credential Access
Steal Application Access Token (70%)
Collection
Data from Local System (90%)
Data from Information Repositories (80%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (90%)
Transfer Data to Cloud Account (60%)
Impact
Defacement (50%)
Financial Theft (70%)
Defense Evasion
Indicator Removal (60%)
Hide Artifacts (50%)

Sources & References