Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (HAW1773679302)
The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.
Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis
Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis
- Timeline of Hawks Consulting's Breach and lateral movement inside company's environment.
- Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
- How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
- How this cyber incident impacts Hawks Consulting Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
- Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.
Full Incident Analysis Transcript
In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Hawks Consulting breach identified under incident ID HAW1773679302.
The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Hawks Consulting's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/hawks-consulting, the number of followers: 222, the industry type: Legal Services and the number of employees: 4 employees
After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 749 and after the incident was 686 with a difference of -63 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.
In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Hawks Consulting and their customers.
On 16 February 2026, Smith Hawks disclosed Data Breach issues under the banner "Smith Hawks Data Breach Affecting Sensitive Personal Information".
Smith Hawks, a Massachusetts-based organization, disclosed a potential data breach where sensitive personal identifiable information (PII) may have been compromised.
The disruption is felt across the environment, and exposing Sensitive personal identifiable information (PII).
In response, and began remediation that includes Complimentary credit monitoring services offered to affected individuals, and stakeholders are being briefed through Notification letters mailed to affected individuals.
The case underscores how Ongoing, with advisories going out to stakeholders covering Notification letters sent to affected individuals with details of compromised data.
Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.
The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.
MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis
Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating sensitive personal identifiable information (PII) may have been compromised and Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating breach notice filed without details on the incident’s cause or scope. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Modify Authentication Process (T1556) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating social Security numbers, financial account details compromised and OS Credential Dumping (T1003) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating driver’s license information exposed. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating names, Social Security numbers, financial account details compromised. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating sensitive PII may have been compromised, exact impact varies by individual and Exfiltration Over Web Service (T1567) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating breach disclosed to Massachusetts Attorney General. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Destruction (T1485) with lower confidence (30%), supported by evidence indicating full extent of the breach and its origins remain undisclosed and Stored Data Manipulation (T1565.001) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating high identity theft and payment information risk noted. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.
Sources & References
- Hawks Consulting Rankiteo Cyber Incident Details: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/hawks-consulting/incident/HAW1773679302
- Hawks Consulting CyberSecurity Rating page: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/hawks-consulting
- Hawks Consulting Rankiteo Cyber Incident Blog Article: https://blog.rankiteo.com/haw1773679302-smith-hawks-breach-march-2026/
- Hawks Consulting CyberSecurity Score History: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/hawks-consulting/history
- Hawks Consulting CyberSecurity Incident Source: https://straussborrelli.com/2026/03/13/smith-hawks-data-breach-investigation/
- Rankiteo A.I CyberSecurity Rating methodology: https://www.rankiteo.com/Images/rankiteo_algo.pdf
- Rankiteo TPRM Scoring methodology: https://static.rankiteo.com/model/rankiteo_tprm_methodology.pdf