Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Hawaiian Airlines » HAWWES1773167326

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (HAWWES1773167326)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-122
Company Score Before Incident765 / 1000
Company Score After Incident643 / 1000
INCIDENT NUMBERHAWWES1773167326
Type of Cyber IncidentRansomware
ATTACK VECTORphishing, social engineering
DATA EXPOSEDNA
INCIDENT DATE27/06/2025
STATUSOngoing

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Hawaiian Airlines's Ransomware and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Hawaiian Airlines Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Hawaiian Airlines breach identified under incident ID HAWWES1773167326.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Hawaiian Airlines's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/hawaiian-airlines, the number of followers: 107482, the industry type: Airlines and Aviation and the number of employees: 3688 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 765 and after the incident was 643 with a difference of -122 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Hawaiian Airlines and their customers.

On 17 June 2024, WestJet disclosed ransomware and data breach issues under the banner "Scattered Spider Cyberattacks on North American Airlines".

At least two major North American airlines, WestJet and Hawaiian Airlines, confirmed cyberattacks in June linked to the cybercriminal group Scattered Spider.

Impact assessments are still underway, so the full scope is not yet clear.

Formal response steps have not been shared publicly yet.

The case underscores how Ongoing.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Phishing (T1566) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating scattered Spider...specializes in phishing and social engineering and Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with lower confidence (30%), supported by evidence indicating no details on initial access vector beyond social engineering. Under the Execution tactic, the analysis identified User Execution: Malicious Link (T1204.001) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating phishing and social engineering to gain access to corporate systems. Under the Persistence tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating social engineering tactics...to gain access to corporate systems. Under the Privilege Escalation tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating once inside, they often hand off control to ransomware operators. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Masquerading (T1036) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating scattered Spider...known for its social engineering tactics. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Adversary-in-the-Middle (T1557) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating social engineering tactics to gain access to corporate systems. Under the Discovery tactic, the analysis identified Account Discovery (T1087) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating once inside...hand off control to ransomware operators. Under the Lateral Movement tactic, the analysis identified Remote Services (T1021) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware deployments...lock critical systems. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Encrypted for Impact (T1486) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating type such as ransomware...lock critical systems and demand payment. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating motivation such as data exfiltration...full scope of breaches under investigation. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Phishing (90%)
Exploit Public-Facing Application (30%)
Execution
User Execution: Malicious Link (80%)
Persistence
Valid Accounts (70%)
Privilege Escalation
Valid Accounts (60%)
Defense Evasion
Masquerading (50%)
Credential Access
Adversary-in-the-Middle (70%)
Discovery
Account Discovery (60%)
Lateral Movement
Remote Services (50%)
Impact
Data Encrypted for Impact (90%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (70%)

Sources & References