Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (HAV1775746120)
The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.
Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis
Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis
- Timeline of Have I Been Pwned's Breach and lateral movement inside company's environment.
- Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
- How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
- How this cyber incident impacts Have I Been Pwned Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
- Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.
Full Incident Analysis Transcript
In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Have I Been Pwned breach identified under incident ID HAV1775746120.
The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Have I Been Pwned's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/haveibeenpwned, the number of followers: 5240, the industry type: IT Services and IT Consulting and the number of employees: 9 employees
After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 649 and after the incident was 554 with a difference of -95 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.
In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Have I Been Pwned and their customers.
MyLovely.AI recently reported "MyLovely.AI Data Breach Exposes Over 100,000 Users’ Sensitive Content", a noteworthy cybersecurity incident.
A significant data breach at MyLovely.AI, an AI-powered platform for NSFW companionship and personalized content, has compromised the personal data of over 100,000 users.
The disruption is felt across the environment, and exposing Email addresses, user-generated prompts, AI-generated images, social media profiles (Discord, X), user IDs, on-site content (prompts, images, metadata), moderation reports, profile details, gallery items, community content, subscription information, 113,000 explicit NSFW prompts, with nearly 100,000+ records at risk.
Formal response steps have not been shared publicly yet.
Overall, the incident is a reminder of why proactive monitoring and strong governance matter.
Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.
The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.
MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis
Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating significant data breach at MyLovely.AI, an AI-powered platform and External Remote Services (T1133) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating platform for NSFW companionship and personalized content. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Steal Application Access Token (T1528) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating user IDs, profile details, subscription information exposed and OS Credential Dumping (T1003) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating email addresses, social media profiles (Discord, X) compromised. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating 113,000 explicit NSFW prompts, 70,000 tied to user IDs and Data from Information Repositories (T1213) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating structured JSON files containing profile details, gallery items. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating leaked datasets shared on a cybercrime forum and Exfiltration Over Web Service (T1567) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating data breach impacting over 100,000 users. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Destruction (T1485) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating highly personal interactions exposed and Disk Wipe (T1561) with lower confidence (30%), supported by evidence indicating no details on vulnerability exploited. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.
Sources & References
- Have I Been Pwned Rankiteo Cyber Incident Details: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/haveibeenpwned/incident/HAV1775746120
- Have I Been Pwned CyberSecurity Rating page: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/haveibeenpwned
- Have I Been Pwned Rankiteo Cyber Incident Blog Article: https://blog.rankiteo.com/hav1775746120-have-i-been-pwned-breach-april-2026/
- Have I Been Pwned CyberSecurity Score History: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/haveibeenpwned/history
- Have I Been Pwned CyberSecurity Incident Source: https://www.helpnetsecurity.com/2026/04/09/mylovely-ai-data-breach-user-conversations/
- Rankiteo A.I CyberSecurity Rating methodology: https://www.rankiteo.com/Images/rankiteo_algo.pdf
- Rankiteo TPRM Scoring methodology: https://static.rankiteo.com/model/rankiteo_tprm_methodology.pdf