Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Hasbro » HAS1776378312

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (HAS1776378312)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-49
Company Score Before Incident649 / 1000
Company Score After Incident600 / 1000
Company LinkView Hasbro Profile
INCIDENT NUMBERHAS1776378312
Type of Cyber IncidentBreach
ATTACK VECTORNA
DATA EXPOSEDEmployee data
INCIDENT DATE31/03/2026
STATUSPending

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Hasbro's Breach and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Hasbro Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Hasbro breach identified under incident ID HAS1776378312.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Hasbro's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/hasbro, the number of followers: 439557, the industry type: Manufacturing and the number of employees: 8079 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 649 and after the incident was 600 with a difference of -49 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Hasbro and their customers.

Hasbro Inc. recently reported "Hasbro Faces Class-Action Lawsuit Over Data Breach Impacting Employees", a noteworthy cybersecurity incident.

A class-action lawsuit has been filed against Hasbro Inc.

The disruption is felt across the environment, and exposing Employee data.

Formal response steps have not been shared publicly yet.

The case underscores how Pending.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating employee data following a recent data breach and Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating negligence in safeguarding personal information. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Unsecured Credentials (T1552) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating failed to protect employee data. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating employee data compromised. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating what data was accessed or stolen and Exfiltration Over Web Service (T1567) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating data breach impacting employees. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Destruction (T1485) with lower confidence (30%), supported by evidence indicating not been transparent about what data was accessed and Defacement (T1491) with lower confidence (20%), supported by evidence indicating invasion of privacy. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Valid Accounts (60%)
Exploit Public-Facing Application (40%)
Credential Access
Unsecured Credentials (70%)
Collection
Data from Local System (80%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (60%)
Exfiltration Over Web Service (50%)
Impact
Data Destruction (30%)
Defacement (20%)

Sources & References