Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Harrods

Harrods Vendor Cyber Rating & Cyber Score

harrodscareers.com

As many lives, generations, cultures and stories pass through our doors, our mission remains unchanged: to serve the needs and aspirations of our customers, to create new stories and bring moments of delight. Whomever they are and wherever they come from, our customers can always expect to be treated with grace, courtesy, and care. #TogetherHarrods Open since 1834 by Charles Henry Harrod and now owned by Qatar Holding Authority, we are truly unique - a house of maisons, a modern atelier, a workshop of wonders, a convener, patron and celebrator of the world’s finest. Known around the world as one of the great luxury emporiums, we offer a transformative experience to customers who know that true value of exceptional goods and services


Harrods A.I CyberSecurity Scoring

Harrods
Company Information
Website:https://www.harrodscareers.com
Employees number:6,873
Number of followers:314,936
NAICS:43
Industry Type:Retail
Homepage:harrodscareers.com
Harrods Risk Score (AI oriented)
Between 0 and 549
logo
HarrodsRetail
Updated:
04/04/2026
251/1000
Critical
C
AaaAaABaaBaBCaaCaC
Powered by our proprietary A.I cyber incident model
Insurance prefers TPRM score to calculate premium
Harrods Global Score (TPRM)
xxxx
logo
HarrodsRetail
•••
Score locked
Instant access to detailed risk factors
Vulnerabilities
Benchmark vs. industry & size peers
Findings

Harrods
HarrodsCritical
Current Score
251C (CRITICAL)
01000
11 incidents
-44.5 avg impact
Incident timeline with MITRE ATT&CK tactics, techniques, and mitigations.
JUNE 2026
278Before Incident
MAY 2026
262Before Incident
APRIL 2026
261Before Incident
MARCH 2026
242Before Incident
FEBRUARY 2026
232Before Incident
JANUARY 2026
214Before Incident
DECEMBER 2025
247Before Incident
Cyber Attack
29 Dec 2025Harrods
Adidas, Heathrow Airport, Harrods, Marks and Spencer, Co-op Group and Jaguar Land Rover: How 2025 Became The Year Of The Cyberattack For British Businesses

354After Incident
CRITICAL-107
ADIHEAHARMARTHEJAG1767017696
2025: A Year of Rising Costs—and Escalating Cyber Threats for UK Businesses As 2025 draws to a close, UK businesses and charities have faced a surge in financial pressures—from soaring employment costs and supply chain disruptions to oil and tariff shocks. Yet, one of the most damaging expenses has been the fallout from cyberattacks, which have hit nearly half of British companies and 30% of charities over the past year. High-profile victims include retail giants Marks & Spencer, Adidas, and the Co-op Group, as well as Heathrow Airport, Harrods, and Jaguar Land Rover (JLR). The public sector hasn’t been spared either: Germany’s parliament and the UK Foreign Office (breached in October) were among those targeted. Attacks ranged from phishing scams to full-scale digital shutdowns, with some incidents costing hundreds of millions. The scale of cybercrime has reached staggering proportions. Cybersecurity Ventures estimates the global cost of cyberattacks in 2025 at $10.5 trillion (£7.8 trillion)—a figure that would rank cybercrime as the world’s third-largest economy, trailing only the US and China. The financial and operational toll underscores the growing threat to organizations across sectors.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
phishingdata breachdigital shutdownransomware
IMPACT
Financial Loss: hundreds of millions of poundsOperational Impact: digital shutdown
NOVEMBER 2025
237Before Incident
OCTOBER 2025
225Before Incident
SEPTEMBER 2025
268Before Incident
Breach
01 Sep 2025Harrods
Harrods

Harrods Data Breach via Third-Party Supplier (2025)

201After Incident
CRITICAL-67
HAR1732117092925
Luxury London-based retailer Harrods confirmed a cybersecurity breach in September 2025, where criminals stole 430,000 customers' data from a compromised third-party supplier. The exposed information includes basic personal details (names, contact details), marketing-related data (membership tier levels, Harrods co-branded card affiliations), but no passwords or financial data. While Harrods stated the stolen marketing data was unlikely to be accurately interpreted by attackers, the breach still poses reputational and operational risks. The company refused to name the affected supplier but assured customers that its own systems remained uncompromised. Harrods also confirmed direct communication from the threat actor, though it declined to engage. This incident is separate from an earlier 2025 attack linked to the Scattered Spider hacking group, which targeted multiple UK retailers. Authorities were notified, and Harrods emphasized its focus on customer support and cooperation with investigations. The breach highlights vulnerabilities in third-party supply chains, raising concerns over data protection compliance and customer trust.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
data breachthird-party compromise
IMPACT
basic personal details (names, contact information)marketing-related data (membership tier levels, Harrods co-branded card affiliation)third-party supplier systemsBrand Reputation Impact: potential reputational harm (second incident in 2025)Identity Theft Risk: low (no financial/password data exposed)Payment Information Risk: none (no financial data compromised)
DATA BREACH
personal identifiable information (PII)marketing dataNumber Of Records Exposed: 430,000Sensitivity Of Data: moderate (no financial/password data)namescontact detailsmembership tier levelsco-branded card affiliation
AUGUST 2025
268Before Incident
JULY 2025
256Before Incident
JUNE 2025
307Before Incident
Breach
16 Jun 2025Harrods
Harrods

Harrods Confirms Major Data Breach Affecting 430,000 Customer Records

285After Incident
CRITICAL-22
HAR1332313093025
Harrods, the iconic British luxury department store, confirmed a data breach affecting ~430,000 customer records after a third-party provider’s system was compromised. The exposed data included personal details (names, email addresses, phone numbers, marketing preferences, and loyalty card information), but no payment data or passwords were stolen. The breach originated externally, with Harrods emphasizing its internal systems remained secure. The company refused to negotiate with hackers, set up a customer helpline, and collaborated with cybersecurity experts and authorities (including the ICO) for mitigation. While the financial impact was not disclosed, the incident aligns with a broader 2025 trend of cyber-attacks on major UK retailers, eroding customer trust and highlighting vulnerabilities in third-party data handling. No ransomware was involved, and the attack was contained by the third party.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
data breachthird-party compromise
IMPACT
namesemail addressestelephone numbersmarketing preferencesloyalty card detailslinks to partner programs (including co-branded cards)third-party provider systemOperational Impact: customer helpline and support portal established; collaboration with cybersecurity experts and law enforcementBrand Reputation Impact: potential erosion of trust among affected customers; broader industry concern over third-party vulnerabilitiesIdentity Theft Risk: moderate (personal details exposed, but no financial or password data)Payment Information Risk: none
DATA BREACH
personal identifierscontact detailsmarketing-related dataNumber Of Records Exposed: 430,000Sensitivity Of Data: moderate (no financial or password data; includes PII like names, emails, phone numbers)
JUNE 2025
427Before Incident
Ransomware
01 Jun 2025Harrods
Harrods, Marks & Spencer, Co-Op and British Horseracing Authority: British Horseracing Authority hit by ransomware

British Horseracing Authority (BHA) Ransomware Attack

302After Incident
CRITICAL-125
HARMARTHEBRI1769526687
UK Organizations Face Rising Ransomware Threats as Cyberattacks Intensify The British Horseracing Authority (BHA) became the latest UK organization to suffer a ransomware attack in early June 2025, compromising multiple servers within its IT infrastructure. While core racing operations and general administration remained unaffected, the incident forced some IT staff to work remotely as authorities worked to contain the breach. The responsible ransomware group has not been identified, with details kept confidential for security reasons. The attack is part of a broader surge in cyber threats targeting Western entities, particularly in the UK. Recent victims include retail giants Marks & Spencer, which fell to the DragonForce ransomware and took five weeks to recover, as well as Co-Op and Harrods, both hit in the past two months. Cybercriminals are increasingly drawn to Western organizations due to two key factors: financial incentives businesses in these regions are more likely to pay ransoms to avoid operational collapse and perceived security gaps, where weak defenses make breaches easier and more profitable. Ransomware tactics have also grown more aggressive. Beyond encrypting data, attackers now employ double extortion, stealing sensitive information before locking systems and threatening to leak it on the dark web if demands aren’t met. In rare cases, they escalate to triple extortion, targeting victims’ customers and partners to inflict reputational damage. As cyber threats evolve in sophistication, the long-term impact on businesses and public institutions remains a pressing concern. The BHA incident underscores the escalating risks faced by organizations across sectors, with no clear resolution in sight.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Ransomware
MOTIVATION
Financial gain, exploitation of perceived security gaps
IMPACT
Systems Affected: Multiple servers within IT infrastructureOperational Impact: IT staff worked remotely during containment
MAY 2025
488Before Incident
Cyber Attack
22 May 2025Harrods
Harrods, Marks & Spencer, Co-op and Peter Green Chilled: Ransomware attack hits food supply chain, exposes retail risks

Ransomware Attack on Peter Green Chilled Disrupts UK Food Supply Chain

425After Incident
CRITICAL-63
THEHARMARPET1770508437
Ransomware Attack on Peter Green Chilled Disrupts UK Food Supply Chain A ransomware attack on Peter Green Chilled, a key distributor of refrigerated goods to major UK supermarkets, has caused significant disruptions to food deliveries across the country. The incident adds to a growing wave of cyberattacks targeting the retail and logistics sectors, following recent breaches at Marks & Spencer, the Co-op, and Harrods. The attack has exposed vulnerabilities in the UK’s supply chain, leading to delays, potential shortages, and concerns over consumer panic buying. Experts warn that such disruptions highlight the high stakes of cybersecurity in retail, where even brief outages can ripple through digital and physical operations. Andy Norton, European Cyber Risk Officer at Armis, emphasized that the sector’s reliance on digital supply chains, operational continuity, and customer data makes it a prime target. Data from Armis Labs shows 41% of retailers have faced increased cyber threats in the past six months, with 79% of IT decision-makers prioritizing proactive cybersecurity measures in the coming year. However, nearly half of surveyed retailers admit past breaches have left their systems inadequately secured, while 46% struggle with evolving regulatory complexities. Security analysts, including Nir Dvorkin of Cynet Security, link the attack to Scattered Spider (UNC3944), a group known for sophisticated tactics like phishing, SIM-swapping, and help desk impersonation. The group’s methods blend social engineering with the exploitation of legitimate remote access tools, making detection difficult. Dvorkin stressed that these attacks are not opportunistic but meticulously planned to bypass defenses. To counter such threats, experts recommend a layered defense strategy, including enforced multi-factor authentication (MFA), restricted remote access, and employee training to recognize social engineering attempts. Despite growing awareness 82% of retail employees know how to report suspicious activity only 46% of organizations claim real-time detection and response capabilities. With high-profile groups like Anonymous, DarkSide, and APT41 posing persistent threats, the retail sector faces mounting pressure to strengthen cyber defenses. The attack on Peter Green Chilled underscores how digital threats now directly impact the physical supply of essential goods, reinforcing the need for enhanced security, training, and regulatory alignment.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Ransomware
IMPACT
Operational Impact: Disruptions to food deliveries, delays, potential shortages, and concerns over consumer panic buying
MAY 2025
551Before Incident
Breach
01 May 2025Harrods
Harrods

Harrods Third-Party Data Breach (September 2025)

468After Incident
CRITICAL-83
HAR36101736110725
Luxury department store Harrods confirmed a data breach in September 2025, where cybercriminals stole up to 430,000 customer records from a third-party IT provider. The compromised data includes basic personal identifiers (names, contact details), loyalty card information, marketing preferences, and co-branded card associations, but no payment details or account passwords were exposed. The breach follows a prior cyberattack attempt in May 2025, where Harrods successfully thwarted unauthorized access to its internal systems. This time, hackers exploited a supply-chain vulnerability, targeting a weaker external partner. Harrods refused to engage with the threat actors, suggesting a ransom demand was involved. While the company assured containment and collaboration with authorities, the incident highlights risks in third-party dependencies and the escalating threat landscape for high-profile retailers.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
data breachthird-party breachsupply chain attack
MOTIVATION
financial gain (ransom demand)data theft
IMPACT
customer namescontact detailsloyalty card informationmarketing preferencesco-branded card tie-insthird-party provider systemOperational Impact: limited (isolated to third-party system)Brand Reputation Impact: moderate (high-profile breach, but no sensitive financial data exposed)Identity Theft Risk: low (basic identifiers only, but phishing risk elevated)Payment Information Risk: none
DATA BREACH
personal identifiersloyalty program datamarketing dataNumber Of Records Exposed: 430,000Sensitivity Of Data: low to moderate (no financial/password data)namescontact details
APRIL 2025
585Before Incident
Ransomware
01 Apr 2025Harrods
Harrods

Ransomware Attacks on British Retail Sector

547After Incident
CRITICAL-38
HAR408071125
Harrods, a luxury department store in London, was one of the targets of a series of ransomware attacks in April. The attacks disrupted business operations and resulted in significant financial and reputational damage. The National Crime Agency has arrested four individuals suspected of involvement in these attacks, which also affected other major British retailers. The NCA is continuing its investigation to identify and bring to justice all those responsible.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Ransomware
MOTIVATION
Financial GainDisruption
JANUARY 2025
625Before Incident
Breach
01 Jan 2025Harrods
Harrods and Marks & Spencer: Account Recovery Becomes a Major Source of Workforce Identity Breaches

Account Recovery Workflows Exploited in Identity Breaches Targeting U.K. Retailers

574After Incident
CRITICAL-51
HARMAR1773319278
Cybersecurity Alert: Account Recovery Workflows Become Prime Target for Identity Breaches In 2025, a wave of cyberattacks targeting major U.K. retailers including Marks & Spencer, Harrods, and the Co-op Group exposed a critical vulnerability in identity security: account recovery workflows. Despite robust multi-factor authentication (MFA) and phishing-resistant controls at login, attackers bypassed protections by exploiting password resets, MFA re-enrollment, and help-desk recovery requests through social engineering. The incidents revealed a systemic flaw: recovery processes are rarely treated as high-risk security events. Designed for speed and convenience, these workflows rely on outdated assumptions such as trust in human judgment, static knowledge-based questions, and unsecured communication channels that are easily manipulated by modern attackers. AI-driven impersonation, synthesized voices, and stolen credentials now allow threat actors to convincingly mimic legitimate users, making deception nearly undetectable for help-desk staff. While MFA is widely adopted, its effectiveness collapses during recovery. Many organizations require minimal verification to reset MFA, allowing attackers to sidestep authentication entirely. The result? Breaches where MFA was technically "enabled" but functionally useless, as compromised recovery flows undermine downstream security controls. The root issue lies in identity assurance being treated as disposable. Onboarding may involve rigorous verification, but recovery often reconstructs trust using weaker signals such as email links or scripted questions rather than referencing the original proofing process. This creates a paradox: the path to regaining access is easier than the path to maintaining it. To counter this, experts argue recovery workflows must be designed for adversarial conditions. High-risk actions should trigger step-up verification, and self-service resets must preserve identity assurance rather than weaken it. Without these changes, attackers will continue to exploit recovery as the weakest link in identity security bypassing strong authentication without ever directly attacking it.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Identity Breach
IMPACT
Brand Reputation Impact: HighIdentity Theft Risk: High
DATA BREACH
Personally Identifiable Information: Likely
JUNE 2024
671Before Incident
Breach
16 Jun 2024Harrods
Harrods

Harrods Third-Party Data Breach Affecting 430,000 Customer Records

603After Incident
CRITICAL-68
HAR1492214093025
Luxury department store Harrods confirmed a cyber breach where attackers stole 430,000 customer records (names, contact details, and marketing tags like tier level or co-branded card affiliations) from a third-party provider’s system. While no payment details or account passwords were compromised, the exposed data poses risks for targeted phishing, social engineering, and identity theft, as evidenced by criminals directly contacting affected customers. Harrods refused to negotiate with the attackers, citing cybersecurity best practices, and is collaborating with the National Cyber Security Centre (NCSC) and Metropolitan Police Cyber Crime Unit for mitigation. The breach was isolated and contained, with no impact on Harrods’ internal systems, but it underscores vulnerabilities in third-party supply chain security. The incident follows an earlier 2024 attack linked to the Scattered Spider group, though unrelated to this breach. Harrods emphasized transparency by notifying affected customers and issuing public statements to maintain trust.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
data breachthird-party compromise
MOTIVATION
extortionpotential data monetization (e.g., phishing, identity theft)
IMPACT
customer namescontact detailsmarketing tags (e.g., tier level, co-branded card affiliation)third-party provider's systemOperational Impact: limited (isolated to third-party provider)Customer Complaints: potential (due to direct contact by attackers)moderate (risk of eroded trust due to third-party breach)mitigated by proactive communicationIdentity Theft Risk: high (due to exposed PII)Payment Information Risk: none (payment details not compromised)
DATA BREACH
personally identifiable information (PII)marketing metadataNumber Of Records Exposed: 430,000Sensitivity Of Data: moderate (no payment details or passwords, but PII usable for phishing/identity theft)namescontact details (email/phone/address if provided)
MAY 2024
737Before Incident
Breach
01 May 2024Harrods
Harrods

Harrods Third-Party Supplier Data Breach (2024)

668After Incident
CRITICAL-69
HAR5992359092925
UK luxury retail giant Harrods suffered a cybersecurity breach after hackers compromised a third-party supplier, exfiltrating 430,000 e-commerce customer records. The stolen data included names, contact details, and internal marketing labels (e.g., loyalty tier levels, co-branded card affiliations), but excluded passwords, payment information, or order histories. The threat actor directly contacted Harrods, likely for extortion, though the company refused engagement. While the breach did not expose highly sensitive financial data, the scale of compromised personal identifiers poses risks for phishing, social engineering, and reputational harm. Harrods proactively notified affected customers and authorities, emphasizing vigilance against follow-up attacks. This incident follows a failed May 2024 ransomware attempt by Scattered Spider (linked to DragonForce ransomware), which Harrods thwarted before system encryption.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Data BreachThird-Party Compromise
MOTIVATION
Data TheftExtortionFinancial Gain
IMPACT
NamesContact DetailsInternal Marketing Tags/Labels (e.g., tier level, co-branded card affiliation)Third-Party Supplier SystemsOperational Impact: Customer Notifications, Regulatory CoordinationBrand Reputation Impact: Potential Reputation Damage Due to Customer Data ExposureIdentity Theft Risk: Low (No Payment Info or Passwords Exposed)Payment Information Risk: None
DATA BREACH
Personal IdentifiersMarketing MetadataNumber Of Records Exposed: 430,000Sensitivity Of Data: Moderate (No Financial/Password Data)Data Exfiltration: YesNamesContact Details
JUNE 2023
792Before Incident
Breach
16 Jun 2023Harrods
Harrods Ltd.

Harrods Customer Data Breach via Third-Party Provider

727After Incident
CRITICAL-65
HAR0952409110725
Harrods Ltd., a luxury department store in London, experienced a data breach where customer information—including names and contact details—was stolen from the systems of a third-party service provider. The breach was part of a broader wave of cyberattacks targeting U.K. businesses in 2023. Harrods confirmed that no sensitive data such as account passwords or payment information was compromised. The incident was isolated, contained, and did not involve Harrods' internal systems. Affected customers were notified, and the company is collaborating with the third-party provider to implement necessary security measures. Authorities were also informed. This follows an earlier attempted breach in May, highlighting the escalating cyber threats faced by British retailers, which have led to significant financial losses and operational disruptions across the sector.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Data BreachThird-Party Compromise
IMPACT
Customer namesContact informationThird-party provider's systemsBrand Reputation Impact: Potential reputational harm due to public disclosure of breachIdentity Theft Risk: Low (no sensitive data like passwords or payment info compromised)Payment Information Risk: None
DATA BREACH
NamesContact informationSensitivity Of Data: Low (no financial or authentication data exposed)

Frequently Asked Questions

?
What is the current A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score for Harrods ?
?
What was Harrods's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in May 2026 ?
?
What was Harrods's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in April 2026 ?
?
What was Harrods's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in March 2026 ?
?
What was Harrods's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in February 2026 ?
?
What was Harrods's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in January 2026 ?
?
What was Harrods's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in December 2025 ?
?
What was Harrods's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in November 2025 ?
?
What was Harrods's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in October 2025 ?
?
What was Harrods's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in September 2025 ?
?
What was Harrods's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in August 2025 ?
?
What was Harrods's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in July 2025 ?
?
What is the average per-incident point impact on Harrods's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score over the past 12 months ?
?
Where can I access detailed records of all cyber incidents associated with Harrods ?
?
Where can I find a summary of the A.I Rankiteo Risk Scoring methodology ?
?
Where can I view Harrods's profile page on Rankiteo ?
?
How accurate is the A.I Rankiteo Risk Scoring methodology ?