Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Harrison County Economic Development Corporation-WV » HAR1779208072

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (HAR1779208072)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-106
Company Score Before Incident759 / 1000
Company Score After Incident653 / 1000
INCIDENT NUMBERHAR1779208072
Type of Cyber IncidentRansomware
ATTACK VECTORNA
DATA EXPOSEDTrue
INCIDENT DATE22/04/2026
STATUSOngoing

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Harrison County Economic Development Corporation-WV's Ransomware and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Harrison County Economic Development Corporation-WV Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Harrison County Economic Development Corporation-WV breach identified under incident ID HAR1779208072.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Harrison County Economic Development Corporation-WV's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/harrisonedc, the number of followers: 966, the industry type: Non-profit Organizations and the number of employees: 4 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 759 and after the incident was 653 with a difference of -106 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Harrison County Economic Development Corporation-WV and their customers.

On 23 April 2026, Harrison County Commission disclosed Ransomware issues under the banner "SafePay Ransomware Attack on Harrison County, WV".

On May 18, 2026, the ransomware group SafePay claimed responsibility for a cyberattack on the Harrison County Commission in West Virginia, which disrupted operations in April 2026.

The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting County courthouse services, administrative functions (Sheriff’s Office), and exposing True.

In response, and began remediation that includes Most systems restored within a week.

The case underscores how Ongoing.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating disrupted operations in April...forced the closure of county courthouse services and Supply Chain Compromise: Compromise Software Supply Chain (T1195.002) with lower confidence (30%), supported by evidence indicating lockBit-based ransomware strain. Under the Execution tactic, the analysis identified User Execution: Malicious File (T1204.002) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating lockBit-based ransomware strain...system encryption. Under the Persistence tactic, the analysis identified Scheduled Task/Job: Scheduled Task (T1053.005) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating some systems remained offline as of May 6. Under the Privilege Escalation tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating administrative functions, particularly in the Sheriff’s Office, faced disruptions. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Execution Guardrails: Environmental Keying (T1480.001) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating lockBit-based ransomware strain and Obfuscated Files or Information (T1027) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating data encryption...double-extortion tactic. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified OS Credential Dumping (T1003) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating administrative functions...faced temporary disruptions. Under the Discovery tactic, the analysis identified File and Directory Discovery (T1083) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating data exfiltration...double-extortion tactic. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating data exfiltration...double-extortion tactic. Under the Command and Control tactic, the analysis identified Application Layer Protocol: Web Protocols (T1071.001) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating safePay data leak site...ransom demand. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating data exfiltration...double-extortion tactic. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Encrypted for Impact (T1486) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating data encryption...double-extortion tactic and Inhibit System Recovery (T1490) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating some systems remained offline as of May 6. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Exploit Public-Facing Application (50%)
Supply Chain Compromise: Compromise Software Supply Chain (30%)
Execution
User Execution: Malicious File (60%)
Persistence
Scheduled Task/Job: Scheduled Task (40%)
Privilege Escalation
Valid Accounts (50%)
Defense Evasion
Execution Guardrails: Environmental Keying (40%)
Obfuscated Files or Information (60%)
Credential Access
OS Credential Dumping (50%)
Discovery
File and Directory Discovery (60%)
Collection
Data from Local System (70%)
Command and Control
Application Layer Protocol: Web Protocols (50%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (80%)
Impact
Data Encrypted for Impact (90%)
Inhibit System Recovery (70%)

Sources & References