What is the official website of Hardie Grant Children’s Publishing ?

The official website of Hardie Grant Children’s Publishing is https://linktr.ee/hardiegrant.

What is Hardie Grant Children’s Publishing's cybersecurity risk score?

Hardie Grant Children’s Publishing has an AI-generated cybersecurity risk score of 750 out of 1000, indicating a Fair security posture according to Rankiteo's assessment.

How many security incidents has Hardie Grant Children’s Publishing experienced?

According to Rankiteo, Hardie Grant Children’s Publishing currently holds 0 security badges, indicating that no recognized compliance certifications are currently verified for the organization.

Has Hardie Grant Children’s Publishing been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents ?

According to Rankiteo, Hardie Grant Children’s Publishing has not been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents, and no incident IDs are currently listed for the organization.

Does Hardie Grant Children’s Publishing have SOC 2 Type 1 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, Hardie Grant Children’s Publishing is not certified under SOC 2 Type 1.

Does Hardie Grant Children’s Publishing have SOC 2 Type 2 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, Hardie Grant Children’s Publishing does not hold a SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Does Hardie Grant Children’s Publishing comply with GDPR ?

According to Rankiteo, Hardie Grant Children’s Publishing is not listed as GDPR compliant.

Does Hardie Grant Children’s Publishing have PCI DSS certification ?

According to Rankiteo, Hardie Grant Children’s Publishing does not currently maintain PCI DSS compliance.

Does Hardie Grant Children’s Publishing comply with HIPAA ?

According to Rankiteo, Hardie Grant Children’s Publishing is not compliant with HIPAA regulations.

Does Hardie Grant Children’s Publishing have ISO 27001 certification ?

According to Rankiteo,Hardie Grant Children’s Publishing is not certified under ISO 27001, indicating the absence of a formally recognized information security management framework.

Which industry does Hardie Grant Children’s Publishing operate in ?

Hardie Grant Children’s Publishing operates primarily in the Book and Periodical Publishing industry.

How many employees does Hardie Grant Children’s Publishing have ?

Hardie Grant Children’s Publishing employs approximately 20 people worldwide.

Does Hardie Grant Children’s Publishing own any subsidiaries ?

Hardie Grant Children’s Publishing presently has no subsidiaries across any sectors.

How many LinkedIn followers does Hardie Grant Children’s Publishing have ?

Hardie Grant Children’s Publishing's official LinkedIn profile has approximately 1,332 followers.

What is the NAICS classification code for Hardie Grant Children’s Publishing ?

Hardie Grant Children’s Publishing is classified under the NAICS code 511, which corresponds to Publishing Industries (except Internet).

Does Hardie Grant Children’s Publishing have a Crunchbase profile ?

No, Hardie Grant Children’s Publishing does not have a profile on Crunchbase.

Does Hardie Grant Children’s Publishing have a LinkedIn profile ?

Yes, Hardie Grant Children’s Publishing maintains an official LinkedIn profile, which is actively utilized for branding and talent engagement, which can be accessed here: https://www.linkedin.com/company/hardie-grant-egmont.

How many cybersecurity incidents has Hardie Grant Children’s Publishing experienced ?

As of July 20, 2026, Rankiteo reports that Hardie Grant Children’s Publishing has not experienced any cybersecurity incidents.

How many peer or competitor companies does Hardie Grant Children’s Publishing have ?

Hardie Grant Children’s Publishing has an estimated 5,143 peer or competitor companies worldwide.

NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop

WindowsmacOSLinux

Download

Badge your company to reduce your risk score and your cyber insurance costs!

Link verified badges to your company page to build trust with insurers and customers.

Apply now and get your badge!

Internal validation & live display

Insurers and partners see a safer profile

Faster underwriting decisions

Trusted by insurers. Chosen by leaders.

Proud contributor to the Society of Actuaries.

HGCP

Boost Score +25 with badge (5 left)

750

/1000

Fair

775

/1000

Fair

Hardie Grant Children’s Publishing Vendor Cyber Rating & Cyber Score

linktr.ee

Add Your Compliance Badge

Hardie Grant Children’s Publishing is the children’s division of the largest independent publisher in Australia, and the home of innovative, inclusive and entertaining books from tots to teens. With modern families and children at the core of everything we do, we have built our success on stories of kindness, diversity, resilience and courage to reflect the world we live in, and the world we want to build.

HGCP A.I CyberSecurity Scoring

Scoring History

HGCP

Hardie Grant Children’s Publishing CyberSecurity News & History

Past Incidents

Attack Types

Entity

Type

Severity

Impact

Seen

Blog Details

Supply Chain Source

Incident Details

View

No data available

Loading…

A.I.

HGCP Company Scoring based on AI Models

Cyber Incidents Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

Actual

Prediction

Incident Predictions locked

Access Monitoring Plan

A.I Risk Score Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

Actual

Prediction A

Prediction B

Prediction C

Prediction D

A.I. Risk Score Predictions locked

Access Monitoring Plan

Loading…

Underwriter Stats for HGCP

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Hardie Grant Children’s Publishing in 2026.

Incidents vs All-Companies Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Hardie Grant Children’s Publishing in 2026.

Incident Types HGCP vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Hardie Grant Children’s Publishing in 2026.

Incident History - HGCP (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Loading…

SUBSIDIARY

Hardie Grant Children’s Publishing Subsidiaries

HGCP

Book and Periodical Publishing

Website: https://linktr.ee/hardiegrant

Company Size: 11-50 employees

EgmontMedia Production

Nordisk FilmEntertainment Providers

Nordisk Film Distribusjon NorgeEntertainment Providers

JollyroomRetail

Story House Egmont NOMedia Production

Dansk Reklame Film A/SAdvertising Services

Story House Egmont UKPeriodical Publishing

Lindhardt og RinghofBook and Periodical Publishing

Saga EgmontBook and Periodical Publishing

EuromanMedia Production

kino.dkOnline Media

Nordisk Film KinoMovies, Videos, and Sound

Story House Egmont BulgariaBook and Periodical Publishing

Biip.noTechnology, Information and Internet

TV 2Broadcast Media Production and Distribution

Egmont ChinaBook and Periodical Publishing

ABCiTY A/SComputer Games

L&R BusinessBook and Periodical Publishing

GoGiftRetail Office Supplies and Gifts

Mediehuset NettavisenMedia Production

Loading…

Hardie Grant Children’s Publishing Similar Companies

Forbes

forbes.com

Forbes Media is a global media, branding and technology company, with a focus on news and information about business, investing, technology, entrepreneurship, leadership and affluent lifestyles. The company publishes Forbes, Forbes Asia, and Forbes Europe magazines as well as Forbes.com. The Forbes brand today reaches more than 94 million people worldwide with its business message each month through its magazines and 37 licensed local editions around the globe, Forbes.com, TV, conferences, research, social and mobile platforms. Forbes Media’s brand extensions include conferences, real estate, education, financial services, and technology license agreements. Forbes is an equal opportunity employer.

Loading…

NEWS

Hardie Grant Children’s Publishing CyberSecurity News

Latest updates, reports, and threat intel affecting the global network.

Loading…

CVE

Latest

Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

CVE-2026-12484

SUMMARY

A vulnerability in keras-team/keras version 3.15.0 allows unsafe deserialization of attacker-controlled PyTorch pickle data through the public `keras.layers.TorchModuleWrapper.from_config` method. This method invokes `torch.load(..., weights_only=False)` without requiring an explicit unsafe opt-in, such as a `safe_mode=False` parameter. When called outside a `SafeModeScope(True)` context, the absence of an ambient safe mode state permits unsafe deserialization by default. This issue can lead to arbitrary code execution if untrusted Keras layer configurations are processed using this method. The vulnerability arises because the method does not enforce safe deserialization practices unless explicitly guarded by Keras safe mode.

Published

Date2026-07-19

Updated

Date2026-07-19

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.8)

cvss3

Base Score: 7.8

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Impact Score

5.9

Exploitability

1.8

REFERENCES

https://huntr.com/bounties/ab14df49-13b5-4442-b754-3189430bfa28

CVE-2026-64186

SUMMARY

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: iommu/amd: Remove latent out-of-bounds access in IOMMU debugfs In iommu_mmio_write() and iommu_capability_write(), the variables dbg_mmio_offset and dbg_cap_offset are declared as int. However, they are populated using kstrtou32_from_user(). If a user provides a sufficiently large value, it can become a negative integer. Prior to this patch, the AMD IOMMU debugfs implementation was already protected by different mechanisms. 1. #define OFS_IN_SZ 8 ensures the user string <= 8 bytes, so e.g. 0xffffffff isn't a valid input. if (cnt > OFS_IN_SZ) return -EINVAL; 2. Implicit type promotion in iommu_mmio_write(), dbg_mmio_offset is int and iommu->mmio_phys_end is u64 if (dbg_mmio_offset > iommu->mmio_phys_end - sizeof(u64)) return -EINVAL; 3. The show handlers would currently catch the negative number and refuse to perform the read. Replace kstrtou32_from_user() with kstrtos32_from_user() to parse the input, and check for negative values to explicitly prevent out-of-bounds memory accesses directly in iommu_mmio_write() and iommu_capability_write().

Published

Date2026-07-19

Updated

Date2026-07-19

RISK INFORMATION (Score: )

Impact Score

Exploitability

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-64185

SUMMARY

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: sysfs: don't remove existing directory on update failure When sysfs_update_group() is called for a named group and create_files() fails (e.g. -ENOMEM), internal_create_group() calls kernfs_remove(kn) on the group directory. In the update path, kn was obtained via kernfs_find_and_get() and refers to a directory that already existed before this call. Removing it silently destroys a sysfs group that the caller did not create. Only remove the directory if we created it ourselves. On update failure the directory remains as it is left empty by remove_files() inside create_files(), but can be repopulated by a retry.

Published

Date2026-07-19

Updated

Date2026-07-19

RISK INFORMATION (Score: )

Impact Score

Exploitability

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-64184

SUMMARY

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: mm/damon/sysfs-schemes: call missing mem_cgroup_iter_break() damon_sysfs_memcg_path_to_id() breaks mem_cgroup_iter() loop without calling mem_cgroup_iter_break(). This leaks the cgroup reference. Fix the issue by calling mem_cgroup_iter_break() before the break. The issue was discovered [1] by Sashiko.

Published

Date2026-07-19

Updated

Date2026-07-19

RISK INFORMATION (Score: )

Impact Score

Exploitability

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-64183

SUMMARY

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: efi: Allocate runtime workqueue before ACPI init Since commit 5894cf571e14 ("acpi/prmt: Use EFI runtime sandbox to invoke PRM handlers") ACPI PRM calls are delegated to a workqueue which runs in a kernel thread, making it easier to detect and mitigate faulting memory accesses performed by the firmware. Rafael reports that such PRM accesses may occur before efisubsys_init() executes, which is where the workqueue is allocated, leading to NULL pointer dereferences. Since acpi_init() [which triggers the early PRM accesses] executes as a subsys_initcall() as well, and has its own dependencies that may be sensitive to initcall ordering, deferring acpi_init() is not an option. So instead, split off the workqueue allocation into its own postcore initcall, as this is the only missing piece to allow EFI runtime calls to be made. This ensures that EFI runtime call (including PRM calls) are accessible to all code running at subsys_initcall() level.

Published

Date2026-07-19

Updated

Date2026-07-19

RISK INFORMATION (Score: )

Impact Score

Exploitability

REFERENCES

Loading…

API

Access Data Using Our API

Get company history

curl -i -X GET 'https://api.rankiteo.com/underwriter-getcompany-history?
linkedin_id=axa' -H 'apikey: YOUR_API_KEY_HERE'

Try It API Documentation Rapid

MEASURE

What Do We Measure ?

Incident

Finding

Grade

Digital Assets

Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.

These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:

Network SecurityIdentify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.

SBOM (Software Bill of Materials)Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.

CMDB (Configuration Management Database)Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.

Threat IntelligenceLeverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.

Rankiteo

By Rankiteo

★ ★ ★ ★ ★

View on G2.com

Rankiteo is a unified scoring and risk platform that analyzes billions of signals weekly to help organizations gain faster, more actionable insights into emerging threats. Empowering teams to outpace adversaries and reduce exposure.

View latest plans →View all security reports →

MILESTONEG

Users
Love Us

Loading…