Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Hardcastle Restaurants Pvt. Ltd. » HARMCDHAR1768994739

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (HARMCDHAR1768994739)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-109
Company Score Before Incident767 / 1000
Company Score After Incident658 / 1000
Company LinkView Hardcastle Restaurants Pvt. Ltd. Profile
INCIDENT NUMBERHARMCDHAR1768994739
Type of Cyber IncidentRansomware
ATTACK VECTORNA
DATA EXPOSED861 GB
INCIDENT DATE15/06/1996
STATUSpublished

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Hardcastle Restaurants Pvt. Ltd.'s Ransomware and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Hardcastle Restaurants Pvt. Ltd. Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Hardcastle Restaurants Pvt. Ltd. breach identified under incident ID HARMCDHAR1768994739.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Hardcastle Restaurants Pvt. Ltd.'s information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/hardcastle-restaurants-pvt-ltd, the number of followers: 105666, the industry type: Restaurants and the number of employees: 458 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 767 and after the incident was 658 with a difference of -109 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Hardcastle Restaurants Pvt. Ltd. and their customers.

On 20 January 2026, McDonald’s India (Connaught Plaza Restaurants Private Limited) disclosed Ransomware, Data Breach issues under the banner "Everest Ransomware Group Claims Massive Data Breach of McDonald’s India Operations".

The Everest ransomware group has taken responsibility for a major cyberattack on McDonald’s India, alleging the exfiltration of 861 gigabytes of sensitive corporate and customer data.

The disruption is felt across the environment, and exposing 861 GB.

Formal response steps have not been shared publicly yet.

Overall, the incident is a reminder of why proactive monitoring and strong governance matter.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating recurring vulnerabilities in its infrastructure and Trusted Relationship (T1199) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating franchise operations globally. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Adversary-in-the-Middle (T1557) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating internal company documents compromised and OS Credential Dumping (T1003) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating transaction histories and internal business records stolen. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating 861 gigabytes of sensitive corporate and customer data and Data from Information Repositories (T1213) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating internal company documents compromised. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating data exfiltration of 861 GB confirmed by threat actors and Exfiltration Over Web Service (T1567) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating disclosed the breach on their dark web leak site. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Encrypted for Impact (T1486) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating dual AES/DES encryption used by Everest ransomware group and Defacement (T1491) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating threats to publicly release the stolen data. Under the Command and Control tactic, the analysis identified Application Layer Protocol (T1071) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating dark web leak site used for ransom demands. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Exploit Public-Facing Application (50%)
Trusted Relationship (40%)
Credential Access
Adversary-in-the-Middle (60%)
OS Credential Dumping (50%)
Collection
Data from Local System (80%)
Data from Information Repositories (70%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (90%)
Exfiltration Over Web Service (60%)
Impact
Data Encrypted for Impact (70%)
Defacement (50%)
Command and Control
Application Layer Protocol (60%)

Sources & References