Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (HAR1764806551)
The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.
Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis
Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis
- Timeline of Harbor Regional Center's Breach and lateral movement inside company's environment.
- Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
- How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
- How this cyber incident impacts Harbor Regional Center Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
- Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.
Full Incident Analysis Transcript
In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Harbor Regional Center breach identified under incident ID HAR1764806551.
The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Harbor Regional Center's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/harbor-regional-center, the number of followers: 882, the industry type: Non-profit Organizations and the number of employees: 257 employees
After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 653 and after the incident was 596 with a difference of -57 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.
In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Harbor Regional Center and their customers.
On 03 December 2025, Harbor Regional Center disclosed Data Breach issues under the banner "Harbor Regional Center Data Breach".
An unauthorized person gained access to Harbor Regional Center’s network and may have acquired records containing personally identifiable information (PII) and protected health information (PHI), including names, addresses, dates of birth, Social Security numbers, medical reco...
The disruption is felt across the environment, and exposing Personally identifiable information (PII) and protected health information (PHI).
Formal response steps have not been shared publicly yet.
The case underscores how Under investigation by Lynch Carpenter, LLP, with advisories going out to stakeholders covering Individuals impacted may be entitled to compensation. Legal review available via Lynch Carpenter, LLP.
Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.
The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.
MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis
Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized person gained access to HRC’s network, Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating access to HRC’s network (no specific vector mentioned), and External Remote Services (T1133) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating access to HRC’s network (implied remote access). Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Unsecured Credentials (T1552) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized access suggests credential compromise and Brute Force (T1110) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating no direct evidence, but common in healthcare breaches. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating acquired records containing PII and PHI and Data from Information Repositories (T1213) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating medical record numbers, diagnosis/treatment info accessed. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating may have acquired records (implies exfiltration) and Transfer Data to Cloud Account (T1537) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating no direct evidence, but possible in healthcare breaches. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Encrypted for Impact (T1486) with lower confidence (30%), supported by evidence indicating no ransomware mentioned, but data exposure is impact and Data Manipulation: Stored Data Manipulation (T1565.001) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating pHI/PII accessed (potential for manipulation). These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.
Sources & References
- Harbor Regional Center Rankiteo Cyber Incident Details: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/harbor-regional-center/incident/HAR1764806551
- Harbor Regional Center CyberSecurity Rating page: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/harbor-regional-center
- Harbor Regional Center Rankiteo Cyber Incident Blog Article: https://blog.rankiteo.com/har1764806551-harbor-regional-center-breach-december-2025/
- Harbor Regional Center CyberSecurity Score History: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/harbor-regional-center/history
- Harbor Regional Center CyberSecurity Incident Source: https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2025/12/03/3199365/0/en/Harbor-Regional-Center-Data-Breach-Claims-Investigated-by-Lynch-Carpenter.html
- Rankiteo A.I CyberSecurity Rating methodology: https://www.rankiteo.com/Images/rankiteo_algo.pdf
- Rankiteo TPRM Scoring methodology: https://static.rankiteo.com/model/rankiteo_tprm_methodology.pdf