Comparison Overview
Hammer Cybersecurity

Hammer Cybersecurity
Innovation House, Bellringer Road, Trentham Lakes South, Stoke-on-Trent, England, GB, ST4 8GH
Last Update: 21/04/2026
Hammer Cybersecurity helps organisations stay resilient in a landscape where threats evolve daily. With more than 35 years’ experience supporting channel partners across the UK, Ireland, and Europe, we deliver market-leading security solutions that protect businesses en...

Cox Enterprises
6305 Peachtree Dunwoody Rd, Atlanta, 30328, US
Last Update: 06/09/2026
Thousands of employees, one goal: empower people today to build a better future for the next generation. How do we do that? By disrupting industries. By treating our employees as our most important resource. By improving the quality of life in our communities and by pro...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Hammer Cybersecurity







Cox Enterprises






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Technology, Information and Media Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Hammer Cybersecurity in 2026.
Incidents vs Technology, Information and Media Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Cox Enterprises in 2026.
Incident History - Hammer Cybersecurity (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Hammer Cybersecurity cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Cox Enterprises (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Cox Enterprises cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Hammer Cybersecurity

Cox Enterprises
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
Netskope was notified about a potential gap in Netskope Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) running on Windows systems. Successful exploitation of the gap could potentially allow a privileged user to send a crafted message to the EPDLP process port to trigger an integer overflow, leading to memory corruption. Successful exploitation would require the EPDLP module to be enabled in the client configuration, and that Memory Integrity is disabled. A successful exploit could potentially result in a denial-of-service, arbitrary code execution, or privilege escalation on the local machine.
Netskope was notified of an out-of-bounds heap read affecting the Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) service of the Netskope Client. A local standard user could potentially send a specially crafted message that is not properly validated with a bounds check, likely crashing the kernel driver handler. Successful exploitation could potentially crash the EPDLP service, temporarily interrupting DLP enforcement. A successful exploit could potentially also reveal per-boot memory layout information to unauthorized users.
IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 is vulnerable to a denial of service where a specific functionality on a Db2 server can be disabled by a privileged user under certain conditions.
IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an attacker with the ability to control or impersonate a DRDA server endpoint to execute arbitrary commands on Db2 clients due to a stack-based buffer overflow that improperly copies user-controlled data into a fixed-size stack buffer without bounds checking.
IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an authenticated user to send a specially crafted request to write arbitrary files on the system.