Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » HackRead Media » HAC1768131204

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (HAC1768131204)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-88
Company Score Before Incident626 / 1000
Company Score After Incident538 / 1000
INCIDENT NUMBERHAC1768131204
Type of Cyber IncidentBreach
ATTACK VECTORNA
DATA EXPOSED672,000 unique email addresses
INCIDENT DATE30/09/2025
STATUSpublished

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of HackRead Media's Breach and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts HackRead Media Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the HackRead Media breach identified under incident ID HAC1768131204.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of HackRead Media's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/hackread, the number of followers: 2137, the industry type: Internet News and the number of employees: 7 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 626 and after the incident was 538 with a difference of -88 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on HackRead Media and their customers.

BreachForums recently reported "BreachForums (2025) Data Breach", a noteworthy cybersecurity incident.

A reincarnation of BreachForums was breached in August before being taken down by law enforcement agencies in October.

The disruption is felt across the environment, and exposing 672,000 unique email addresses, with nearly 672,000 records at risk.

In response, moved swiftly to contain the threat with measures like Taken down by law enforcement.

Overall, the incident is a reminder of why proactive monitoring and strong governance matter.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating revived version of the notorious hacking forum BreachForums was itself compromised and External Remote Services (T1133) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating forum posts, and private messages exposed (underground marketplace access). Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Gather Victim Identity Information: Email Addresses (T1589.002) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating 672,000 unique email addresses scraped from user profiles, forum posts, and private messages and Gather Victim Identity Information (T1589) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating 53% of the leaked emails were already indexed by LinkedIn (professional data). Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Information Repositories (T1213) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating email addresses scraped from user profiles, forum posts, and private messages and Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating data breach included user, post, and private message tables. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating 672,000 unique email addresses exposed (data breach scale) and Exfiltration Over Web Service (T1567) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating underground marketplace likely facilitated data exfiltration. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Destruction (T1485) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating law enforcement dismantled the platform in October 2024 (disruption) and Disk Wipe: Disk Structure Wipe (T1561.002) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating takedown disrupted operations (potential data loss). These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Exploit Public-Facing Application (70%)
External Remote Services (60%)
Credential Access
Gather Victim Identity Information: Email Addresses (90%)
Gather Victim Identity Information (80%)
Collection
Data from Information Repositories (90%)
Data from Local System (70%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (80%)
Exfiltration Over Web Service (60%)
Impact
Data Destruction (50%)
Disk Wipe: Disk Structure Wipe (40%)

Sources & References