Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (NAVHAC1774377242)
The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.
Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis
Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis
- Timeline of HackerOne's Breach and lateral movement inside company's environment.
- Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
- How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
- How this cyber incident impacts HackerOne Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
- Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.
Full Incident Analysis Transcript
In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the HackerOne breach identified under incident ID NAVHAC1774377242.
The analysis begins with a detailed overview of HackerOne's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/hackerone, the number of followers: 350380, the industry type: Computer and Network Security and the number of employees: 6662 employees
After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 700 and after the incident was 581 with a difference of -119 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.
In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on HackerOne and their customers.
On 23 March 2026, HackerOne disclosed Data Breach issues under the banner "HackerOne Data Breach Traces Back to Third-Party Benefits Provider".
HackerOne disclosed a data breach affecting 287 U.S.-based employees and dependents, originating from Navia Benefit Solutions Inc., a third-party benefits administrator.
The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting Navia Benefit Solutions Inc. systems, and exposing Social Security numbers, full names, addresses, dates of birth, email addresses, health plan details, and dependent data, with nearly 287 records at risk.
In response, and began remediation that includes Navia is offering complimentary credit monitoring services through Kroll, and stakeholders are being briefed through Written notices to affected individuals, disclosure to Maine Attorney General.
The case underscores how Ongoing (awaiting further details from Navia), with advisories going out to stakeholders covering Affected individuals notified via written notices; inquiries directed to [email protected] or Navia’s assistance line.
Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.
The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.
MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis
Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Supply Chain Compromise (T1195) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating breach originated from Navia Benefit Solutions Inc., a third-party benefits administrator and Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating broken Object Level Authorization (BOLA) vulnerability in Navia’s systems. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Unsecured Credentials (T1552) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating bOLA vulnerability allowed unauthorized access to sensitive data. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating social Security numbers, full names, addresses, health plan details compromised. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating data exfiltration detected; 287 records exposed. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Stored Data Manipulation (T1565.001) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating high risk for identity theft, fraud, or financial loss. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Hide Artifacts (T1564) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating suspicious activity detected between December 22, 2025, and January 15, 2026. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.
Sources & References
- HackerOne Rankiteo Cyber Incident Details: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/hackerone/incident/NAVHAC1774377242
- HackerOne CyberSecurity Rating page: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/hackerone
- HackerOne Rankiteo Cyber Incident Blog Article: https://blog.rankiteo.com/navhac1774377242-hackerone-navia-benefit-solutions-inc-breach-december-2025/
- HackerOne CyberSecurity Score History: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/hackerone/history
- HackerOne CyberSecurity Incident Source: https://www.claimdepot.com/data-breach/hackerone-2026
- Rankiteo A.I CyberSecurity Rating methodology: https://www.rankiteo.com/Images/rankiteo_algo.pdf
- Rankiteo TPRM Scoring methodology: https://static.rankiteo.com/model/rankiteo_tprm_methodology.pdf