Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

(주)GS리테일(GS Retail Inc.)(주)GS리테일(GS Retail Inc.)
VS
SobeysSobeys
(주)GS리테일(GS Retail Inc.)

(주)GS리테일(GS Retail Inc.)

GS Tower 508, Nonhyeon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, KR, 06141

Last Update: 31/08/2026

View Profile
Between 0 and 549
http://www.gsretail.com/
472/1000Critical

GS리테일은 최고의 제품과 진실된 서비스로 고객을 만족시키며 높은 수익을 창출하고, 지속적으로 성장하는 기업입니다. 유통업계의 Leading Company인 GS리테일은 편의점, 수퍼, 헬스&뷰티, 호텔 사업 등 다양한 사업을 기반으로 트렌드를 선도하고 있습니다. 탁월한 조직 역량과 경영을 바탕으로 GS리테일은 꾸준히 성장과 이익의 균형이 잡힌 성과를 내고 있습니다. 통합 쇼핑 플랫폼의 선두 주자인 GS홈쇼핑은 GS리테일의 가족이 되었습니다. GS홈쇼핑은 TV, 카탈로그, 인터...

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:974
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
3
Attack type number
1
Sobeys

Sobeys

115 King Street, Stellarton, Nova Scotia, CA, B0K 1S0

Last Update: 14/09/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.sobeyscareers.com
746/1000Moderate

As one of only two national grocery retailers in Canada, Sobeys Inc. serves the food shopping needs of Canadians with more than 1,500 stores in 10 provinces with retail banners that include Sobeys, Safeway, IGA, Foodland, FreshCo, Price Chopper, Thrifty Foods and Lawton...

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:17,217
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
(주)GS리테일(GS Retail Inc.)

(주)GS리테일(GS Retail Inc.)

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Sobeys

Sobeys

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

(주)GS리테일(GS Retail Inc.) has 44.44% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sobeys in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - (주)GS리테일(GS Retail Inc.) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

(주)GS리테일(GS Retail Inc.) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Sobeys (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sobeys cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
(주)GS리테일(GS Retail Inc.)

(주)GS리테일(GS Retail Inc.)

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
GS-KORSUN1788150289
🔒 Incident : Breach
GS-1788144886
🔒 Incident : Breach
GS-1788150360
Sobeys

Sobeys

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
SOB2053121122

FAQ

Between (주)GS리테일(GS Retail Inc.) company and Sobeys company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between (주)GS리테일(GS Retail Inc.) company and Sobeys company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between (주)GS리테일(GS Retail Inc.) company and Sobeys company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between (주)GS리테일(GS Retail Inc.) company and Sobeys company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between (주)GS리테일(GS Retail Inc.) company and Sobeys company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between (주)GS리테일(GS Retail Inc.) company and Sobeys company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between (주)GS리테일(GS Retail Inc.) company and Sobeys company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between (주)GS리테일(GS Retail Inc.) company and Sobeys company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between (주)GS리테일(GS Retail Inc.) company and Sobeys company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between (주)GS리테일(GS Retail Inc.) company and Sobeys company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between (주)GS리테일(GS Retail Inc.) company and Sobeys company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between (주)GS리테일(GS Retail Inc.) and Sobeys, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between (주)GS리테일(GS Retail Inc.) and Sobeys, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - (주)GS리테일(GS Retail Inc.) or Sobeys ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - (주)GS리테일(GS Retail Inc.) or Sobeys ?
Between (주)GS리테일(GS Retail Inc.) and Sobeys, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between (주)GS리테일(GS Retail Inc.) and Sobeys, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-94426
SUMMARY

A vulnerability was determined in xuxueli xxl-job up to 3.5.0. The impacted element is an unknown function of the file /jobgroup/insert. This manipulation of the argument Name causes cross site scripting. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-21
UPDATED
Date2026-09-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.5)
CVSS2
Base Score: 4.0
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:N/I:P/A:N
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 2.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-94425
SUMMARY

A vulnerability was found in Moore Threads MTT S80 Driver Package 340.150. The affected element is the function sub_140006F0C in the library mtdispkm64.sys of the component IOCTL Handler. The manipulation results in improper privilege management. Attacking locally is a requirement. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-21
UPDATED
Date2026-09-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS2
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
AV:L/AC:L/Au:S/C:C/I:C/A:C
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2
CVE-2026-94627
SUMMARY

vLLM Mooncake connector through 0.29.0 fails to properly manage GPU KV cache block ownership when concurrent child requests share a single transfer ID in prefill/decode disaggregated deployments. Attackers can trigger GPU memory exhaustion by submitting completion requests with multiple prompts, causing orphaned KV cache blocks to accumulate until process restart and eventually preventing legitimate requests from executing.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-21
UPDATED
Date2026-09-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-94626
SUMMARY

vLLM through 0.29.0 fails to validate the tp_size parameter in kv_transfer_params on OpenAI-compatible completion endpoints, allowing attackers to allocate unbounded memory. Attackers can supply arbitrary tp_size values in prefill/decode disaggregated deployments to exhaust memory and trigger kernel OOM-kill of the decode worker process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-21
UPDATED
Date2026-09-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-94625
SUMMARY

vLLM through 0.29.0 contains a resource exhaustion vulnerability in MooncakeConnector where rejected prefill requests create ownerless transfer placeholders that are never reclaimed. Attackers can send rejected requests to exhaust sender task pools, causing valid requests to be delayed by up to 480 seconds while health checks continue returning success.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-21
UPDATED
Date2026-09-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9